Literature DB >> 28522743

Forward to the Past: The Case for Quantitative PET Imaging.

Adriaan A Lammertsma1.   

Abstract

PET was developed in the 1970s as an in vivo method to measure regional pathophysiologic processes. In the 1990s the focus moved to the detection of local increases in uptake, first in the brain (activation studies) and later in oncology (finding metastases), with 18F-FDG emerging as a highly sensitive staging technique. This focus on sensitivity has overshadowed the other main characteristic of PET, its quantitative nature. In recent years there has been a shift. PET is now seen as a promising tool for drug development and precision medicine-that is, a method to monitor or even predict response to therapy. Quantification is essential for precision medicine, but many studies today use simplified semiquantitative methods without properly validating them. This review provides several examples illustrating that simplified methods may lead to less accurate or even misleading results. Simplification is important for routine clinical practice, but finding the optimal balance between accuracy and simplicity requires careful studies. It is argued that the use of simplified approaches without proper validation not only may waste time and resources but also may raise ethical questions, especially in drug development studies.
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamic scanning; ethics; positron emission tomography; quantification; static scanning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28522743     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.188029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  56 in total

1.  Expression of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors in the human retina revealed by positron emission tomography and targeted mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Fernando Caravaggio; Enzo Scifo; Etienne L Sibille; Sergio E Hernandez-Da Mota; Philip Gerretsen; Gary Remington; Ariel Graff-Guerrero
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 2.  Quantitative Rodent Brain Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Kristina Herfert; Julia G Mannheim; Laura Kuebler; Sabina Marciano; Mario Amend; Christoph Parl; Hanna Napieczynska; Florian M Maier; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Direct attenuation correction of brain PET images using only emission data via a deep convolutional encoder-decoder (Deep-DAC).

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Pardis Ghafarian; Parham Geramifar; Kevin Ho-Yin Leung; Mostafa Ghelichoghli; Mehrdad Oveisi; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A new frontier for amyloid PET imaging: multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Silvia Morbelli; Matteo Bauckneht; Selene Capitanio; Matteo Pardini; Luca Roccatagliata; Flavio Nobili
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Amyloid Load: A More Sensitive Biomarker for Amyloid Imaging.

Authors:  Alex Whittington; Roger N Gunn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Impact of Using Uniform Attenuation Coefficients for Heterogeneously Dense Breasts in a Dedicated Breast PET/X-ray Scanner.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Joseph Y Lo; Gregory M Sturgeon; Chengeng Zeng; Robert L Harrison; Paul E Kinahan; William Paul Segars
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-29

7.  Validation of Parametric Methods for [11C]UCB-J PET Imaging Using Subcortical White Matter as Reference Tissue.

Authors:  Nathalie Mertens; Ralph Paul Maguire; Kim Serdons; Brigitte Lacroix; Joel Mercier; David Sciberras; Koen Van Laere; Michel Koole
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Has molecular imaging delivered to drug development?

Authors:  Philip S Murphy; Neel Patel; Timothy J McCarthy
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Quantification: there is more to worry about than good scanner hardware and reliable calibration.

Authors:  Jörg Kotzerke; Jörg van den Hoff
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Exploiting the Full Potential of β-Amyloid and Tau PET Imaging for Drug Efficacy Testing.

Authors:  Henryk Barthel; John Seibyl; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Victor L Villemagne; Osama Sabri
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.