Literature DB >> 28251589

Neurostimulation Devices Used in Treatment of Epilepsy.

Evren Burakgazi Dalkilic1.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder frequently requiring lifelong treatment. In 70% of epilepsy patients, seizures are well controlled by antiepileptic medications. About 30% of epilepsy patients remain refractory to medical treatments and may need surgical interventions for better seizure control. Unfortunately and not infrequently, surgical intervention is not feasible due to various reasons such as multiple seizure foci, not resectable focus because of eloquent cortex location, or inability to tolerate surgery due to ongoing concomitant medical conditions. Neurostimulation devices have provided possible seizure control for refractory epilepsy patients who are not candidates for surgical intervention. Among them, vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been the oldest, in use since 1997. VNS was followed by responsive nerve stimulation (RNS) after obtaining FDA approval in 2013. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has not yet met approval in the USA, but has been in clinical practice in Europe since 2010. Neurostimulation devices vary in how they are inserted and their mechanisms of action. VNS has been easily accepted by patients since it is placed extracranially. By contrast, DBS and RNS require invasive procedures for intracranial implantation. As use of these devices will continue to increase in the foreseeable future, we aimed to contribute to the foundation for new research to expand on current knowledge and practice by reviewing the current status of the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed-loop; Deep brain stimulation (DBS); Epilepsy; Medically refractory; Neurostimulation; Neurostimulation devices; Open-loop; Response rate; Responsive neurostimulation (RNS); Seizure reduction; Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS)

Year:  2017        PMID: 28251589     DOI: 10.1007/s11940-017-0442-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol        ISSN: 1092-8480            Impact factor:   3.598


  30 in total

1.  Vagus nerve prolonged stimulation in cats: effects on epileptogenesis (amygdala electrical kindling): behavioral and electrographic changes.

Authors:  A Fernández-Guardiola; A Martínez; A Valdés-Cruz; V M Magdaleno-Madrigal; D Martínez; R Fernández-Mas
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 2.  The descriptive epidemiology of epilepsy-a review.

Authors:  Poonam Nina Banerjee; David Filippi; W Allen Hauser
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Preliminary evaluation of cerebellar stimulation by double-blind stimulation and biological criteria in the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  J M Van Buren; J H Wood; J Oakley; F Hambrecht
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Repetitive low-frequency stimulation reduces epileptiform synchronization in limbic neuronal networks.

Authors:  G D'Arcangelo; G Panuccio; V Tancredi; M Avoli
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 5.996

5.  Reversibility of chronic neurologic deficits. Some effects of electrical stimulation of the thalamus and internal capsule in man.

Authors:  I S Cooper; A R Upton; I Amin
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1980

6.  Vagus nerve stimulation modulates cortical synchrony and excitability through the activation of muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  J A Nichols; A R Nichols; S M Smirnakis; N D Engineer; M P Kilgard; M Atzori
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Anticonvulsant effect of anterior thalamic high frequency electrical stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  M A Mirski; L A Rossell; J B Terry; R S Fisher
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 8.  Vagus nerve stimulation, side effects, and long-term safety.

Authors:  E Ben-Menachem
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Changes in activity of striato-thalamo-cortical network precede generalized spike wave discharges.

Authors:  Friederike Moeller; Hartwig R Siebner; Stephan Wolff; Hiltrud Muhle; Rainer Boor; Oliver Granert; Olav Jansen; Ulrich Stephani; Michael Siniatchkin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Two-year seizure reduction in adults with medically intractable partial onset epilepsy treated with responsive neurostimulation: final results of the RNS System Pivotal trial.

Authors:  Christianne N Heck; David King-Stephens; Andrew D Massey; Dileep R Nair; Barbara C Jobst; Gregory L Barkley; Vicenta Salanova; Andrew J Cole; Michael C Smith; Ryder P Gwinn; Christopher Skidmore; Paul C Van Ness; Gregory K Bergey; Yong D Park; Ian Miller; Eric Geller; Paul A Rutecki; Richard Zimmerman; David C Spencer; Alica Goldman; Jonathan C Edwards; James W Leiphart; Robert E Wharen; James Fessler; Nathan B Fountain; Gregory A Worrell; Robert E Gross; Stephan Eisenschenk; Robert B Duckrow; Lawrence J Hirsch; Carl Bazil; Cormac A O'Donovan; Felice T Sun; Tracy A Courtney; Cairn G Seale; Martha J Morrell
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 5.864

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Seizure detection: do current devices work? And when can they be useful?

Authors:  Xiuhe Zhao; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  In Vivo Femtosecond Laser Subsurface Cortical Microtransections Attenuate Acute Rat Focal Seizures.

Authors:  Shivathmihai Nagappan; Lena Liu; Robert Fetcho; John Nguyen; Nozomi Nishimura; Ryan E Radwanski; Seth Lieberman; Eliza Baird-Daniel; Hongtao Ma; Mingrui Zhao; Chris B Schaffer; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Epilepsy Treatment: A Futurist View.

Authors:  Michael Privitera
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.500

4.  Deep brain stimulation for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with an emphasis on alleviation of seizure frequency outcome.

Authors:  Bowen Chang; Jiwen Xu
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Towards an Evidence-Based Approach to Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Sisterson; Thomas A Wozny; Vasileios Kokkinos; Alexander Constantino; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Chronic abdominal vagus stimulation increased brain metabolic connectivity, reduced striatal dopamine transporter and increased mid-brain serotonin transporter in obese miniature pigs.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Malbert; Mickael Genissel; Jean-Louis Divoux; Christine Henry
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Altered amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and regional homogeneity in drug-resistant epilepsy patients with vagal nerve stimulators under different current intensity.

Authors:  Jin Zhu; Cuiping Xu; Xi Zhang; Liang Qiao; Xueyuan Wang; Xiaohua Zhang; Xiaoming Yan; Duanyu Ni; Tao Yu; Guojun Zhang; Yongjie Li
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 8.  Imaging of Neuromodulation and Surgical Interventions for Epilepsy.

Authors:  M E Adin; D D Spencer; E Damisah; A Herlopian; J L Gerrard; R A Bronen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.966

9.  Calcium imaging in freely-moving mice during electrical stimulation of deep brain structures.

Authors:  James K Trevathan; Anders J Asp; Evan N Nicolai; Jonathan Trevathan; Nicholas A Kremer; Takashi D Yoshida Kozai; David Cheng; Mike Schachter; Jonathan J Nassi; Stephani L Otte; Jones G Parker; J Luis Lujan; Kip Ludwig
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.