| Literature DB >> 30862754 |
Kate E Dingle1,2,3, Xavier Didelot4, T Phuong Quan5,2,3, David W Eyre5,2, Nicole Stoesser5,2, Charis A Marwick6, John Coia7, Derek Brown7, Sarah Buchanan8, Umer Z Ijaz8, Cosmika Goswami8, Gill Douce8, Warren N Fawley9, Mark H Wilcox9, Timothy E A Peto5,2,3, A Sarah Walker5,2,3, Derrick W Crook5,2,3.
Abstract
The increasing clinical importance of human infections (frequently severe) caused by Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 (RT078) was first reported in 2008. The severity of symptoms (mortality of ≤30%) and the higher proportion of infections among community and younger patients raised concerns. Farm animals, especially pigs, have been identified as RT078 reservoirs. We aimed to understand the recent changes in RT078 epidemiology by investigating a possible role for antimicrobial selection in its recent evolutionary history. Phylogenetic analysis of international RT078 genomes (isolates from 2006 to 2014, n = 400), using time-scaled, recombination-corrected, maximum likelihood phylogenies, revealed several recent clonal expansions. A common ancestor of each expansion had independently acquired a different allele of the tetracycline resistance gene tetM Consequently, an unusually high proportion (76.5%) of RT078 genomes were tetM positive. Multiple additional tetracycline resistance determinants were also identified (including efflux pump tet40), frequently sharing a high level of nucleotide sequence identity (up to 100%) with sequences found in the pig pathogen Streptococcus suis and in other zoonotic pathogens such as Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Each RT078 tetM clonal expansion lacked geographic structure, indicating rapid, recent international spread. Resistance determinants for C. difficile infection-triggering antimicrobials, including fluoroquinolones and clindamycin, were comparatively rare in RT078. Tetracyclines are used intensively in agriculture; this selective pressure, plus rapid, international spread via the food chain, may explain the increased RT078 prevalence in humans. Our work indicates that the use of antimicrobials outside the health care environment has selected for resistant organisms, and in the case of RT078, has contributed to the emergence of a human pathogen.IMPORTANCE Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 (RT078) has multiple reservoirs; many are agricultural. Since 2005, this genotype has been increasingly associated with human infections in both clinical settings and the community. Investigations of RT078 whole-genome sequences revealed that tetracycline resistance had been acquired on multiple independent occasions. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a rapid, recent increase in numbers of closely related tetracycline-resistant RT078 (clonal expansions), suggesting that tetracycline selection has strongly influenced its recent evolutionary history. We demonstrate recent international spread of emergent, tetracycline-resistant RT078. A similar tetracycline-positive clonal expansion was also identified in unrelated nontoxigenic C. difficile, suggesting that this process may be widespread and may be independent of disease-causing ability. Resistance to typical C. difficile infection-associated antimicrobials (e.g., fluoroquinolones, clindamycin) occurred only sporadically within RT078. Selective pressure from tetracycline appears to be a key factor in the emergence of this human pathogen and the rapid international dissemination that followed, plausibly via the food chain.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium difficile; PCR ribotype 078; emerging pathogen; phylogenetic analysis; tetracycline resistance; whole-genome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30862754 PMCID: PMC6414706 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02790-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
Antimicrobial resistance accessory genes used to search C. difficile whole-genome sequences
| Accessory gene | Reference | Protein encoded | Antimicrobial resistance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ribosomal protection protein | Tetracycline | ||
| Ribosomal protection protein | Tetracycline | ||
| Ribosomal protection protein | Tetracycline | ||
| Ribosomal protection protein | Tetracycline | ||
| Ribosomal protection protein | Tetracycline | ||
| Efflux pump | Tetracycline | ||
| Efflux pump | Tetracycline | ||
| Efflux pump | Tetracycline | ||
| rRNA adenine N-6-methyltransferase | Macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) | ||
| Aminoglycoside 3′-phosphotransferase | Aminoglycoside (streptomycin) | ||
| AAC(6')-APH(2') | 6'-N-Acetyltransferase and 2″-O-phosphotransferase | Most clinically important aminoglycosides, |
Additional classes of tetracycline resistance ribosomal protection proteins were searched for but not found, including those encoded by tet, otrA, tetS, tetQ, tet36, tetT, and tet44 (75, 76). Additional tetracycline efflux pumps were searched for but not found, including those encoded by tetA, tetB, tetC, tetD, tetE, tetG, tetH, tetJ, tetV, tetY, tetZ, tet30 (75).
Ribosomal protection protein gene mosaic (77).
Only found in ST54(012) (not RT078).
tetM confers tetracycline resistance phenotype (30, 37, 38).
Macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance phenotype (conferred by the gene ermB) including clindamycin resistance, which has been associated with CDI outbreaks (10, 78–80).
Aminoglycoside resistance as conferred by aphA1 (30).
Antimicrobial resistance housekeeping genes used to search C. difficile whole-genome sequences
| Housekeeping | Nonsynonymous | Protein | Antimicrobial resistance |
|---|---|---|---|
| T(82)I | DNA gyrase subunit A | Fluoroquinolones | |
| D(426)N | DNA gyrase subunit B | Fluoroquinolones | |
| R(505)K | β subunit RNA polymerase | Rifampicin |
Resistance to fluoroquinolones in C. difficile can be accurately predicted by the presence of the nonsynonymous mutations in the following genes: gyrA C(245)T [T(82)I] and gyrB G(1276)A and [D(426)N] (8 [Table S1], 81–83).
The R(505)K substitution is the most frequently identified single substitution resulting in high-level (>32 mg/liter) resistance to rifampin (83, 84).
FIG 1Prevalence of tetracycline resistance determinants in RT078 and other clinically relevant C. difficile genotypes. (A) Proportion (percentage) of each clinically important genotype that was positive for the ribosomal protection protein (RPP) gene tetM. Data are shown for genotypes having 10 genomes or more, from isolate collections representing Oxfordshire (EIA positives and negatives, infant and farm) and Leeds, North America, and Europe (Optimer clinical trial) (8, 29, 30, 33, 34). The total number of isolates of each genotype is shown above the bar. Clades are defined as described in reference 69. (B) Numbers of genomes in the collections described above which contained additional non-tetM tetracycline resistance determinants. For the ST11(078) genotype, the additional Scottish (n = 110) isolate collection was also included (indicated by “+110” above the bar at the left). Therefore, a total of 340 ST11(078) isolates were examined (the n = 230 described in the panel A legend above plus an additional n = 110 Scottish ST11s), the aim being to illustrate the overall prevalence of “non-tetM” tetracycline resistance determinants within this genotype.
FIG 2United Kingdom-representative, time-scaled RT078 phylogeny revealing a lack of geographic structure but strong structuring of tetracycline resistance. (A) Map showing the areas of the United Kingdom from which the RT078 C. difficile genomes were obtained. (B) Time-scaled ClonalFrameML phylogeny constructed using genomes from United Kingdom C. difficile isolates, comprising Oxfordshire (n = 78), Leeds (n = 104), and Scottish (n = 110) isolates. Branch colors, as defined for panel A, denote the location of each genome. Colored bars to the right of the phylogeny indicate the presence of tetracycline resistance determinants; ribosomal protection protein (RPP) allele sequences detected within each genome were assigned numbers to identify distinct nucleotide sequences of tetM, tetO/32/O, tetO, or tetW. To the right of the phylogeny, the chromosomal locations of the three most prevalent tetM alleles (designated tetM 10, 16, and 19) relative to the RT078 M120 genome (NCBI reference sequence NC_017174.1) are shown. All phylogenies included in this study are directly comparable post-1990, i.e., in the time frame of RT078 emergence; the gray shaded block over the region corresponding to the time period prior to that date indicates that region is not scaled identically and should not be used for comparisons. (C) The extent to which RT078 clonal expansions are associated with geographic structure and tetracycline resistance (ribosomal protection proteins and efflux pumps) was determined using two-sided quantile regression. (Left) Differences in median evolutionary distinctiveness scores compared to Oxfordshire samples. A lower evolutionary distinctiveness value indicates a larger proportion of close relatives in the tree. The P values indicate the overall significance of geographic location in the evolutionary distinctiveness score. (Center) Differences in median evolutionary distinctiveness scores for samples with ribosomal protection proteins detected compared to ribosomal protection protein-negative samples, overall and for each of the three putative tetM-associated clonal expansions. A lower evolutionary distinctiveness value indicates a larger proportion of close relatives in the tree. The P values indicate the significance of gene presence in the evolutionary distinctiveness score. (Right) Differences in median evolutionary distinctiveness scores for samples with tetracycline efflux pumps [tet40 and tetA(P)] detected compared to efflux pump-negative samples. A lower evolutionary distinctiveness value indicates a larger proportion of close relatives in the tree. The P value indicates the significance of gene presence in the evolutionary distinctiveness score.
FIG 3United Kingdom regional RT078 phylogenies; Scotland and Oxfordshire. (A) Map and legend indicating the regions of Scotland and Oxfordshire from which genomes originated. The Scottish regions correspond to administrative areas known as “health boards.” (B) Time-scaled RT078 phylogeny for Scotland. Branch colors are as described in the panel A legend. Colored bars to the right of the phylogeny denote the ribosomal protection protein (RPP) allele sequences detected within each genome (as described in the Fig. 2 legend), numbers being assigned to identify distinct nucleotide sequences of tetM or tetO/32/O. Isolates were cultured from human clinical samples received from both hospital and community patients, the latter being indicated by a black dot. The gray shaded block over the region corresponding to the period prior to 1990 indicates that the region is not scaled identically for different phylogenies and should not be used for comparisons. (C) Time-scaled RT078 phylogeny for Oxfordshire clinical and nonclinical isolates. Branch colors are as described in the panel A legend. Colored bars indicate ribosomal protection protein alleles as described above.
FIG 4International phylogenies confirm that three major tetM-positive RT078 clades are present across continents. (A) Map of Western Europe. The regions of England and The Netherlands from which the genomes included in panel B originated are highlighted (in black and pink, respectively). (B) Time-scaled RT078 phylogeny constructed using genomes of clinical isolates from England (Oxfordshire and Leeds), supplemented with genomes from the Netherlands (human isolates [clinical or farmer] and pig isolates [30]). Branch colors are as described for the map in panel A. The presence of the three predominant ribosomal protection protein (RPP) tetM alleles (tetM 10, 16, and 19) is indicated by the colored bars to the right of the tree. The gray shaded block over the region corresponding to the period prior to 1990 indicates that the region is not scaled identically for different phylogenies and should not be used for comparisons. (C) Map highlighting the regions in North America and Western Europe from which the genomes included in panel D originated. (D) Time-scaled RT078 phylogeny constructed using genomes of clinical isolates from England supplemented with clinical isolates from North America and Europe (distinct from the isolates used as described for panel B) from two clinical trials of the drug fidaxomicin (Table S1) (33, 34).
FIG 5Phylogenetic analysis of additional tetM-positive C. difficile genotypes. Time-scaled phylogenies were constructed representing four non-RT078 genotypes with >60% tetM prevalence as follows: (A) ST35(046), (B) ST26(140), (C) ST54(012), and (D) ST37(017). In the phylogenies shown in panels B and D, a single closely related genome of a distinct genotype (ST12 and ST109, respectively) was included to ensure that the tree was rooted pre-1990 and that the four phylogenies could therefore be compared post-1990. The gray shaded block over the region corresponding to the period prior to 1990 indicates that the region is not scaled identically for different phylogenies and should not be used for comparisons. Genomes were from Oxfordshire (clinical EIA positives and negatives plus nonclinical, healthy infants) and Leeds (clinical isolates); branch colors indicate location/isolation source as described above. Colored bars to the right of each phylogeny indicate the presence of tetracycline resistance determinants. Colored dots represent additional genetic determinants identified as conferring resistance to fluoroquinolones, rifampin, clindamycin, and aminoglycosides (Table 1 and 2) and are shown where five or more positive genomes were identified per genotype.