Literature DB >> 30860434

Prognosis of Six-Month Glasgow Outcome Scale in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Hospital Admission Characteristics, Injury Severity Characteristics, and Physiological Monitoring during the First Day Post-Injury.

M Laura Rubin1, Jose-Miguel Yamal2, Wenyaw Chan2, Claudia S Robertson3.   

Abstract

Gold standard prognostic models for long-term outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) use admission characteristics and are considered useful in some areas but not for clinical practice. In this study, we aimed to build prognostic models for 6-month Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) in patients with severe TBI, combining baseline characteristics with physiological, treatment, and injury severity data collected during the first 24 h after injury. We used a training dataset of 472 TBI subjects and several data mining algorithms to predict the long-term neurological outcome. Performance of these algorithms was assessed in an independent (test) sample of 158 subjects. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) led to the highest prediction accuracy (area under the receiving operating characteristic curve = 0.86) in the test set. The most important post-baseline predictor of GOS was the best motor Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) recorded in the first day post-injury. The LASSO model containing the best motor GCS and baseline variables as predictors outperformed a model with baseline data only. TBI patient physiology of the first day-post-injury did not have a major contribution to patient prognosis six months after injury. In conclusion, 6-month GOS in patients with TBI can be predicted with good accuracy by the end of the first day post-injury, using hospital admission data and information on the best motor GCS achieved during those first 24 h post-injury. Passed the first day after injury, important physiological predictors could emerge from landmark analyses, leading to prediction models of higher accuracy than the one proposed in the current research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glasgow Outcome Scale; first day post-injury; prognostic model; secondary injury; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30860434      PMCID: PMC6661910          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  24 in total

1.  The relation between acute physiological variables and outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale following severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  M A Struchen; H J Hannay; C F Contant; C S Robertson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  A joint logistic regression and covariate-adjusted continuous-time Markov chain model.

Authors:  Maria Laura Rubin; Wenyaw Chan; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Claudia Sue Robertson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Jugular venous desaturation and outcome after head injury.

Authors:  S P Gopinath; C S Robertson; C F Contant; C Hayes; Z Feldman; R K Narayan; R G Grossman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

5.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.

Authors:  Pablo Perel; Miguel Arango; Tim Clayton; Phil Edwards; Edward Komolafe; Stuart Poccock; Ian Roberts; Haleema Shakur; Ewout Steyerberg; Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-12

6.  Novel methods to predict increased intracranial pressure during intensive care and long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation in a multicenter dataset.

Authors:  Fabian Güiza; Bart Depreitere; Ian Piper; Greet Van den Berghe; Geert Meyfroidt
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Automated measurement of "pressure times time dose" of intracranial hypertension best predicts outcome after severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Sibel Kahraman; Richard P Dutton; Peter Hu; Yan Xiao; Bizhan Aarabi; Deborah M Stein; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-07

8.  Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic models.

Authors:  Bob Roozenbeek; Hester F Lingsma; Fiona E Lecky; Juan Lu; James Weir; Isabella Butcher; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Pablo Perel; Andrew I Maas; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Predictive value of initial computerized tomography scan, intracranial pressure, and state of autoregulation in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Magdalena Hiler; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Hutchinson; Marcella Balestreri; Peter Smielewski; Basil Matta; John D Pickard
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  8 in total

1.  Initial CT-based radiomics nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter development and validation study.

Authors:  Rui-Zhe Zheng; Zhi-Jie Zhao; Xi-Tao Yang; Shao-Wei Jiang; Yong-de Li; Wen-Jie Li; Xiu-Hui Li; Yue Zhou; Cheng-Jin Gao; Yan-Bin Ma; Shu-Ming Pan; Yang Wang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Neurosurgery: a Systematic Literature Review Using Topic Modeling. Part II: Research Objectives and Perspectives.

Authors:  G V Danilov; M A Shifrin; K V Kotik; T A Ishankulov; Yu N Orlov; A S Kulikov; A A Potapov
Journal:  Sovrem Tekhnologii Med       Date:  2020-12-28

3.  Digital signatures for early traumatic brain injury outcome prediction in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Anil K Palepu; Aditya Murali; Jenna L Ballard; Robert Li; Samiksha Ramesh; Hieu Nguyen; Hanbiehn Kim; Sridevi Sarma; Jose I Suarez; Robert D Stevens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Salivary S100 calcium-binding protein beta (S100B) and neurofilament light (NfL) after acute exposure to repeated head impacts in collegiate water polo players.

Authors:  Derek C Monroe; Elizabeth A Thomas; Nicholas J Cecchi; Douglas A Granger; James W Hicks; Steven L Small
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A machine learning model for predicting favorable outcome in severe traumatic brain injury patients after 6 months.

Authors:  Mehdi Nourelahi; Fardad Dadboud; Hosseinali Khalili; Amin Niakan; Hossein Parsaei
Journal:  Acute Crit Care       Date:  2022-01-21

6.  Chinese Admission Warning Strategy for Predicting the Hospital Discharge Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Ruizhe Zheng; Zhongwei Zhuang; Changyi Zhao; Zhijie Zhao; Xitao Yang; Yue Zhou; Shuming Pan; Kui Chen; Keqin Li; Qiong Huang; Yang Wang; Yanbin Ma
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  AUS-TBI: The Australian Health Informatics Approach to Predict Outcomes and Monitor Intervention Efficacy after Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Melinda Fitzgerald; Jennie Ponsford; Natasha A Lannin; Terence J O'Brien; Peter Cameron; D James Cooper; Nick Rushworth; Belinda Gabbe
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2022-06-07

8.  Disability Rating Scale in the First Few Weeks After a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury as a Predictor of 6-Month Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Jose-Miguel Yamal; Imoigele P Aisiku; H Julia Hannay; Frances A Brito; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.