Literature DB >> 23263587

Novel methods to predict increased intracranial pressure during intensive care and long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation in a multicenter dataset.

Fabian Güiza1, Bart Depreitere, Ian Piper, Greet Van den Berghe, Geert Meyfroidt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial pressure monitoring is standard of care after severe traumatic brain injury. Episodes of increased intracranial pressure are secondary injuries associated with poor outcome. We developed a model to predict increased intracranial pressure episodes 30 mins in advance, by using the dynamic characteristics of continuous intracranial pressure and mean arterial pressure monitoring. In addition, we hypothesized that performance of current models to predict long-term neurologic outcome could be substantially improved by adding dynamic characteristics of continuous intracranial pressure and mean arterial pressure monitoring during the first 24 hrs in the ICU.
DESIGN: Prognostic modeling. Noninterventional, observational, retrospective study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: The Brain Monitoring with Information Technology dataset consisted of 264 traumatic brain injury patients admitted to 22 neuro-ICUs from 11 European countries.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Predictive models were built with multivariate logistic regression and Gaussian processes, a machine learning technique. Predictive attributes were Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury-basic and International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trial design in TBI-core predictors, together with time-series summary statistics of minute-by-minute mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure. MAIN
RESULTS: Increased intracranial pressure episodes could be predicted 30 mins ahead with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p value 0.12, calibration slope 1.02, calibration-in-the-large -0.02) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve = 0.87) on an external validation dataset. Models for prediction of poor neurologic outcome at six months (Glasgow Outcome Score 1-2) based only on static admission data had 0.72 area under the receiver operating curve; adding dynamic information of intracranial pressure and mean arterial pressure during the first 24 hrs increased performance to 0.90. Similarly, prediction of Glasgow Outcome Score 1-3 was improved from 0.68 to 0.87 when including dynamic information.
CONCLUSION: The dynamic information in continuous mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure monitoring allows to accurately predict increased intracranial pressure in the neuro-ICU. Adding information of the first 24 hrs of intracranial pressure and mean arterial pressure monitoring to known baseline risk factors allows very accurate prediction of long-term neurologic outcome at 6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23263587     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182742d0a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  33 in total

Review 1.  Severe Cranioencephalic Trauma: Prehospital Care, Surgical Management and Multimodal Monitoring.

Authors:  Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar; Andres M Rubiano; Hernando Raphael Alvis-Miranda; Willem Calderon-Miranda; Gabriel Alcala-Cerra; Marco Antonio Blancas Rivera; Amit Agrawal
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2016-01

2.  Intracranial pressure thresholds in severe traumatic brain injury: Con : The injured brain is not aware of ICP thresholds!

Authors:  Raimund Helbok; G Meyfroidt; R Beer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Prediction model for intracranial hypertension demonstrates robust performance during external validation on the CENTER-TBI dataset.

Authors:  Giorgia Carra; Fabian Güiza; Bart Depreitere; Geert Meyfroidt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Real alerts and artifact classification in archived multi-signal vital sign monitoring data: implications for mining big data.

Authors:  Marilyn Hravnak; Lujie Chen; Artur Dubrawski; Eliezer Bose; Gilles Clermont; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Cerebral microdialysis in traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage: state of the art.

Authors:  Marcelo de Lima Oliveira; Ana Carolina Kairalla; Erich Talamoni Fonoff; Raquel Chacon Ruiz Martinez; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Edson Bor-Seng-Shu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Modelling Risk of Cardio-Respiratory Instability as a Heterogeneous Process.

Authors:  Lujie Chen; Artur Dubrawski; Gilles Clermont; Marilyn Hravnak; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 7.  Brain Multimodality Monitoring: Updated Perspectives.

Authors:  David Roh; Soojin Park
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 8.  Neurocritical Care: Bench to Bedside (Eds. Claude Hemphill, Michael James) Integrating and Using Big Data in Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Brandon Foreman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Trending autoregulatory indices during treatment for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nam Kim; Alex Krasner; Colin Kosinski; Michael Wininger; Maria Qadri; Zachary Kappus; Shabbar Danish; William Craelius
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Predicting Intracranial Pressure and Brain Tissue Oxygen Crises in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Risa B Myers; Christos Lazaridis; Christopher M Jermaine; Claudia S Robertson; Craig G Rusin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.