Literature DB >> 18270239

Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.

Pablo Perel, Miguel Arango, Tim Clayton, Phil Edwards, Edward Komolafe, Stuart Poccock, Ian Roberts, Haleema Shakur, Ewout Steyerberg, Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate practical prognostic models for death at 14 days and for death or severe disability six months after traumatic brain injury.
DESIGN: Multivariable logistic regression to select variables that were independently associated with two patient outcomes. Two models designed: "basic" model (demographic and clinical variables only) and "CT" model (basic model plus results of computed tomography). The models were subsequently developed for high and low-middle income countries separately.
SETTING: Medical Research Council (MRC) CRASH Trial.
SUBJECTS: 10,008 patients with traumatic brain injury. Models externally validated in a cohort of 8509.
RESULTS: The basic model included four predictors: age, Glasgow coma scale, pupil reactivity, and the presence of major extracranial injury. The CT model also included the presence of petechial haemorrhages, obliteration of the third ventricle or basal cisterns, subarachnoid bleeding, midline shift, and non-evacuated haematoma. In the derivation sample the models showed excellent discrimination (C statistic above 0.80). The models showed good calibration graphically. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test also indicated good calibration, except for the CT model in low-middle income countries. External validation for unfavourable outcome at six months in high income countries showed that basic and CT models had good discrimination (C statistic 0.77 for both models) but poorer calibration.
CONCLUSION: Simple prognostic models can be used to obtain valid predictions of relevant outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270239      PMCID: PMC2249681          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  20 in total

1.  Addressing the growing burden of trauma and injury in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Karen Hofman; Aron Primack; Gerald Keusch; Sharon Hrynkow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury-outcomes at 6 months.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Miguel Arango; Laura Balica; Rowland Cottingham; Hesham El-Sayed; Barbara Farrell; Janice Fernandes; Tamar Gogichaisvili; Nyoman Golden; Bennie Hartzenberg; Mazhar Husain; Mario Izurieta Ulloa; Zouheir Jerbi; Hussein Khamis; Edward Komolafe; Véronique Laloë; Gabrielle Lomas; Silke Ludwig; Guy Mazairac; Maria de los Angeles Muñoz Sanchéz; Luis Nasi; Fatos Olldashi; Patrick Plunkett; Ian Roberts; Peter Sandercock; Haleema Shakur; Caridad Soler; Reto Stocker; Petr Svoboda; Stefan Trenkler; N K Venkataramana; Jonathan Wasserberg; David Yates; Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jun 4-10       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Ewout W Steyerberg; J Dik F Habbema; Elana Farace; Anthony Marmarou; Gordon D Murray; Lawrence F Marshall; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage.

Authors:  B Jennett; M Bond
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Lawrence F Marshall; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information.

Authors:  A C Justice; K E Covinsky; J A Berlin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  D F Signorini; P J Andrews; P A Jones; J M Wardlaw; J D Miller
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Does prediction of outcome alter patient management?

Authors:  L S Murray; G M Teasdale; G D Murray; B Jennett; J D Miller; J D Pickard; M D Shaw; J Achilles; S Bailey; P Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Ian Roberts; David Yates; Peter Sandercock; Barbara Farrell; Jonathan Wasserberg; Gabrielle Lomas; Rowland Cottingham; Petr Svoboda; Nigel Brayley; Guy Mazairac; Véronique Laloë; Angeles Muñoz-Sánchez; Miguel Arango; Bennie Hartzenberg; Hussein Khamis; Surakrant Yutthakasemsunt; Edward Komolafe; Fatos Olldashi; Yadram Yadav; Francisco Murillo-Cabezas; Haleema Shakur; Phil Edwards
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Oct 9-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  265 in total

1.  Covariate adjustment increased power in randomized controlled trials: an example in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Pablo Perel; Tim Clayton; Phil Edwards; Adrian V Hernández; Ian Roberts; Haleema Shakur; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Effect of the modified Glasgow Coma Scale score criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and modified Glasgow Coma Scale score model scores of 13.

Authors:  Jorge Humberto Mena; Alvaro Ignacio Sanchez; Andres M Rubiano; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry; Maria Isabel Gutierrez; Juan Carlos Puyana
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-11

3.  Quantitative CT improves outcome prediction in acute traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Esther L Yuh; Shelly R Cooper; Adam R Ferguson; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Predicting outcome after childhood brain injury.

Authors:  Rob Forsyth; Fenella Kirkham
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A clinical decision rule to predict adult patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage who do not require intensive care unit admission.

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Kiarash Shahlaie; Angela Echeverri; James F Holmes
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Neurological examination of critically ill patients: a pragmatic approach. Report of an ESICM expert panel.

Authors:  Tarek Sharshar; Giuseppe Citerio; Peter J D Andrews; Arturo Chieregato; Nicola Latronico; David K Menon; Louis Puybasset; Claudio Sandroni; Robert D Stevens
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Factors associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Nicolas Côte; Alexis F Turgeon; François Lauzier; Lynne Moore; Damon C Scales; Francis Bernard; Ryan Zarychanski; Karen E A Burns; Maureen O Meade; David Zygun; Jean-François Simard; Amélie Boutin; Jacques G Brochu; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Addressing the challenges of obtaining functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury research: missing data patterns, timing of follow-up, and three prognostic models.

Authors:  Leila R Zelnick; Laurie J Morrison; Sean M Devlin; Eileen M Bulger; Karen J Brasel; Kellie Sheehan; Joseph P Minei; Jeffrey D Kerby; Samuel A Tisherman; Sandro Rizoli; Riyad Karmy-Jones; Rardi van Heest; Craig D Newgard
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Revealing Latent Value of Clinically Acquired CTs of Traumatic Brain Injury Through Multi-Atlas Segmentation in a Retrospective Study of 1,003 with External Cross-Validation.

Authors:  Andrew J Plassard; Patrick D Kelly; Andrew J Asman; Hakmook Kang; Mayur B Patel; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-20

10.  Novel Metabolomic Comparison of Arterial and Jugular Venous Blood in Severe Adult Traumatic Brain Injury Patients and the Impact of Pentobarbital Infusion.

Authors:  Stephanie M Wolahan; Elliott Lebby; Howard C Mao; David McArthur; Courtney Real; Paul Vespa; Daniel Braas; Thomas C Glenn
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.