Literature DB >> 30855125

3D Bioprinted Scaffolds Containing Viable Macrophages and Antibiotics Promote Clearance of Staphylococcus aureus Craniotomy-Associated Biofilm Infection.

Amy Aldrich, Mitchell A Kuss, Bin Duan, Tammy Kielian.   

Abstract

Craniotomy involves the removal of a skull fragment to access the brain, such as during tumor or epilepsy surgery, which is immediately replaced intraoperatively. The infection incidence after craniotomy ranges from 0.8 to 3%, with approximately half caused by Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus). To mitigate infectious complications following craniotomy, we engineered a three-dimensional (3D) bioprinted bone scaffold to harness the potent antibacterial activity of macrophages (MΦs) together with antibiotics using a mouse S. aureus craniotomy-associated biofilm model that establishes a persistent infection on the bone flap, subcutaneous galea, and brain. The 3D scaffold contained rifampin and daptomycin printed in a composite slurry, with viable MΦs incorporated into a hydrogel-based bioink, which was assessed for both the treatment and prevention of craniotomy-associated infections in the mouse model. For the treatment paradigm, the bone flap was removed at day 7 post infection after a mature biofilm had formed and was replaced with a 3D printed antibiotic scaffold, with or without MΦ incorporation. Bacterial burdens in the galea and brain were reduced by at least 100-fold at early time points, which was potentiated by bioprinting viable MΦs into the 3D antibiotic scaffold. We also examined a prevention paradigm, where the scaffolds were placed at the time of surgery and challenged with S. aureus one day later at the surgical site. Interestingly, unlike the treatment paradigm, the incorporation of viable MΦs into the 3D antibiotic scaffold did not enhance bacterial clearance compared to that of antibiotic alone. With further refinement, our 3D bioprinted scaffold represents a potential treatment modality, as it delivers therapeutic antibiotic levels more rapidly than systemic administration, based on its proximity to the infection site. In addition, the incorporation of viable MΦs into the 3D scaffold is an important advance, which demonstrated an improved therapeutic benefit for the treatment of established biofilms that represent the most clinically challenging scenario.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bioprinting; Staphylococcus aureus; biofilm infection; craniotomy; macrophage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30855125      PMCID: PMC7034353          DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b00264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  34 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial persister cell formation and dormancy.

Authors:  Thomas K Wood; Stephen J Knabel; Brian W Kwan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Risk factors of neurosurgical site infection after craniotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenyan Fang; Tao Zhu; Ping Zhang; Liang Xia; Caixing Sun
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Bone flap salvage in acute surgical site infection after craniotomy for tumor resection.

Authors:  David J Wallace; Michael J McGinity; John R Floyd
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Clinical, radiological, and microbiological profile of patients with autogenous cranioplasty infections.

Authors:  Ivan P Bhaskar; Timothy J J Inglis; Gabriel Y F Lee
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Compartmentalization of immune responses during Staphylococcus aureus cranial bone flap infection.

Authors:  Joseph Cheatle; Amy Aldrich; William E Thorell; Michael D Boska; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Isolation of brain-infiltrating leukocytes.

Authors:  Reghann G LaFrance-Corey; Charles L Howe
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilms prevent macrophage phagocytosis and attenuate inflammation in vivo.

Authors:  Lance R Thurlow; Mark L Hanke; Teresa Fritz; Amanda Angle; Amy Aldrich; Stetson H Williams; Ian L Engebretsen; Kenneth W Bayles; Alexander R Horswill; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Postoperative central nervous system infection: incidence and associated factors in 2111 neurosurgical procedures.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Walter A Hall
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Interleukin-10 production by myeloid-derived suppressor cells contributes to bacterial persistence during Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic biofilm infection.

Authors:  Cortney E Heim; Debbie Vidlak; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.962

10.  Pus and free bone flaps.

Authors:  Lars Widdel; Ken R Winston
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  15 in total

1.  3D printed composite scaffolds with dual small molecule delivery for mandibular bone regeneration.

Authors:  Wenhai Zhang; Wen Shi; Shaohua Wu; Mitchell Kuss; Xiping Jiang; Jason B Untrauer; St Patrick Reid; Bin Duan
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 2.  Biomaterials against Bone Infection.

Authors:  María Vallet-Regí; Daniel Lozano; Blanca González; Isabel Izquierdo-Barba
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Understanding and utilizing textile-based electrostatic flocking for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Alec McCarthy; Rajesh Shah; Johnson V John; Demi Brown; Jingwei Xie
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 19.162

4.  Transcriptional Diversity and Niche-Specific Distribution of Leukocyte Populations during Staphylococcus aureus Craniotomy-Associated Biofilm Infection.

Authors:  Amy L Aldrich; Christopher M Horn; Cortney E Heim; Lee E Korshoj; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress.

Authors:  Sara Cristina Pedroza-González; Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Pérez-Benítez; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-04-20

6.  Visible Light-Curable Chitosan Ink for Extrusion-Based and Vat Polymerization-Based 3D Bioprintings.

Authors:  Mitsuyuki Hidaka; Masaru Kojima; Masaki Nakahata; Shinji Sakai
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  Ink-jet 3D printing as a strategy for developing bespoke non-eluting biofilm resistant medical devices.

Authors:  Yinfeng He; Jeni Luckett; Belen Begines; Jean-Frédéric Dubern; Andrew L Hook; Elisabetta Prina; Felicity R A J Rose; Christopher J Tuck; Richard J M Hague; Derek J Irvine; Paul Williams; Morgan R Alexander; Ricky D Wildman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 15.304

8.  The Prospect of Nanoparticle Systems for Modulating Immune Cell Polarization During Central Nervous System Infection.

Authors:  Lee E Korshoj; Wen Shi; Bin Duan; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  TLR2 and caspase-1 signaling are critical for bacterial containment but not clearance during craniotomy-associated biofilm infection.

Authors:  Amy L Aldrich; Cortney E Heim; Wen Shi; Rachel W Fallet; Bin Duan; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 8.322

10.  Micrococcal-Nuclease-Triggered On-Demand Release of Vancomycin from Intramedullary Implant Coating Eradicates Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Mouse Femoral Canals.

Authors:  Ananta Ghimire; Jordan D Skelly; Jie Song
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 14.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.