Ananta Ghimire1, Jordan D Skelly1, Jie Song1. 1. Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States.
Abstract
Preventing orthopedic implant-associated bacterial infections remains a critical challenge. Current practices of physically blending high-dose antibiotics with bone cements is known for cytotoxicity while covalently tethering antibiotics to implant surfaces is ineffective in eradicating bacteria from the periprosthetic tissue environment due to the short-range bactericidal actions, which are limited to the implant surface. Here, we covalently functionalize poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate hydrogel coatings with vancomycin via an oligonucleotide linker sensitive to Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) micrococcal nuclease (MN) (PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco). This design enables the timely release of vancomycin in the presence of S. aureus to kill the bacteria both on the implant surface and within the periprosthetic tissue environment. Ti6Al4V intramedullary (IM) pins surface-tethered with dopamine methacrylamide (DopaMA) and uniformly coated with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco effectively prevented periprosthetic infections in mouse femoral canals inoculated with bioluminescent S. aureus. Longitudinal bioluminescence monitoring, μCT quantification of femoral bone changes, end point quantification of implant surface bacteria, and histological detection of S. aureus in the periprosthetic tissue environment confirmed rapid and sustained bacterial clearance by the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco coating. The observed eradication of bacteria was in stark contrast with the significant bacterial colonization on implants and osteomyelitis development found in the absence of the MN-sensitive bactericidal coating. The effective vancomycin tethering dose presented in this on-demand release strategy was >200 times lower than the typical prophylactic antibiotic contents used in bone cements and may be applied to medical implants and bone/dental cements to prevent periprosthetic infections in high-risk clinical scenarios. This study also supports the timely bactericidal action by MN-triggered release of antibiotics as an effective prophylactic method to bypass the notoriously harder to treat periprosthetic biofilms and osteomyelitis.
Preventing orthopedic implant-associated bacterial infections remains a critical challenge. Current practices of physically blending high-dose antibiotics with bone cements is known for cytotoxicity while covalently tethering antibiotics to implant surfaces is ineffective in eradicating bacteria from the periprosthetic tissue environment due to the short-range bactericidal actions, which are limited to the implant surface. Here, we covalently functionalize poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate hydrogel coatings with vancomycin via an oligonucleotide linker sensitive to Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) micrococcal nuclease (MN) (PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco). This design enables the timely release of vancomycin in the presence of S. aureus to kill the bacteria both on the implant surface and within the periprosthetic tissue environment. Ti6Al4V intramedullary (IM) pins surface-tethered with dopamine methacrylamide (DopaMA) and uniformly coated with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco effectively prevented periprosthetic infections in mouse femoral canals inoculated with bioluminescent S. aureus. Longitudinal bioluminescence monitoring, μCT quantification of femoral bone changes, end point quantification of implant surface bacteria, and histological detection of S. aureus in the periprosthetic tissue environment confirmed rapid and sustained bacterial clearance by the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco coating. The observed eradication of bacteria was in stark contrast with the significant bacterial colonization on implants and osteomyelitis development found in the absence of the MN-sensitive bactericidal coating. The effective vancomycin tethering dose presented in this on-demand release strategy was >200 times lower than the typical prophylactic antibiotic contents used in bone cements and may be applied to medical implants and bone/dental cements to prevent periprosthetic infections in high-risk clinical scenarios. This study also supports the timely bactericidal action by MN-triggered release of antibiotics as an effective prophylactic method to bypass the notoriously harder to treat periprosthetic biofilms and osteomyelitis.
Periprosthetic infections represent occasional
but serious health threats. Bacterial colonization around implants
and subsequent biofilm formation are difficult to treat and could
lead to implant failure, requiring major revision surgeries associated
with high treatment cost, high morbidity, and even mortality.[1−3] There are no effective strategies for eradicating established biofilms
or bacteria harboring within dense tissues such as the canaliculi
of bone due to poor penetration of antibiotics and immune cells into
the dense matrices of biofilm and cortical bone.[4−7] Thus, prophylactic strategies,
particularly in high-risk patient populations and/or following high-risk
clinical procedures, that ensure timely elimination of bacteria within
the implant microenvironment thereby preventing biofilm formation
or bacteria invasion into bone canaliculi would be highly desired.A current clinical practice for preventing infections in high-risk
orthopedic joint replacement surgeries involves physical blending
of antibiotics with bone cements. This approach, however, requires
high antibiotic loading that could exert local and systemic cytotoxicity.
Delivering antibiotics via noncovalent implant surface coatings has
been pursued as a safer alternative,[8,9] although achieving
suitable antibiotic release kinetics to ensure adequate and prompt
release remains a challenge.[8,10−15] Antibiotics covalently attached to implant surfaces[4,16,17] have also been shown to exert
bactericidal properties when they are presented via linkers or polymer
chains of suitable flexibility/lengths[18,19] at a modification
site minimally perturbing the bioactivity of the drug.[20] A limitation of this covalent surface modification
approach, however, is that the antibiotic action is restricted to
the immediate surface of the
implant. For instance, we recently demonstrated that vancomycin covalently
conjugated to the polymer brushes grafted from Ti6Al4V intramedullary
(IM) pins was able to significantly reduce the colonization/growth
of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) on the metallic implant surface.[21] Complete
eradication of bacteria within the periprosthetic IM tissue environment,
however, was not achieved due to the inability of the covalently tetheredvancomycin to diffuse away from the Ti6Al4V surface.We envision
that the covalent attachment of antibiotics to the implant surface
via a linker sensitive to unique bacterial enzymatic activities could
bridge the gap among the existing approaches. The timely on-demand
release of free antibiotics from covalently modified implant surfaces
could help combat infections within a broader periprosthetic tissue
microenvironment while mitigating cytotoxicity associated with the
burst release of high doses of physically entrapped antibiotics or
risks for developing bacteria resistance due to inadequate/delayed
antibiotic releases.[18,22] Various advanced drug delivery
systems utilizing external stimuli such as pH, temperature, magnetic
field, and ultrasound to trigger drug release were developed.[23−27] More recently, endogenous enzymatic activities (especially proteases
and nucleases) have been exploited as more biologically relevant and
safer alternatives to stimulate on-demand drug release from peptide-
and nucleotide-based delivery systems.[23] Nonspecific cleavages of the peptide and oligonucleotide in these
systems, however, present barriers to the success of this approach.
Oligonucleotide sequences with 2′-O-carboxymethyl
modifications were recently shown to improve cleavage specificity[27] by micrococcal nucleases (MNs) of S.
aureus, the Gram-positive bacterium responsible for a third
of all orthopedic implant related infections and a major cause of
osteomyelitis.[3] The therapeutic efficacy
of the MN-triggered release of physically entrapped vancomycin in
silica nanocapsules was demonstrated in vitro.[28,29] However, in vivo efficacy of this approach, especially
in the context of on-demand release of covalently tethered antibiotics
for combating periprosthetic infections, is unknown.Here, we
covalently functionalize PEGDMA hydrogel with vancomycin via a 2′-O-carboxymethyl modified oligonucleotide linker sensitive
to S. aureusMN and evaluate its antibacterial activity in vitro and antiperiprosthetic infection properties in vivo upon application to metallic implants as a surface
coating using a rodent femoral canal infection model. The oligonucleotide
linker (abbreviated as oligo, Figure a) consists of a carboxylic acid and an acrydite on
either end of the mC–mG–T–T–mC–mG
sequence, which was previously shown to exhibit enhanced stability
to mouse and human serum but sensitivity to S. aureusMN cleavages.[28−30] The acrydite end is used to covalently conjugate
the probe to the PEGDMA matrix during radical polymerization (Figure b) while the carboxylic
acid end of the oligo linker is used to form an amide linkage with
the N-vancosaminyl group of vancomycin via EDC/NHS
chemistry (Figure c). Vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibiotic acting at the Gram-positive
bacterial cell walls to block peptidoglycan synthesis, is considered
the most effective in treating infections caused by Staphylococcus including Methicillin-resistant S. aureus.[31] It inhibits the transpeptidation and transglycosylation
steps of bacterial cell wall biosynthesis through the binding of the l-Lys–d-Ala–d-Ala termini of
the nascent peptidoglycan precursor through H-bonds. Chemical modification
at the N-vancosaminyl site is known to present minimal
perturbation to this binding.[32,33] The flexible C5 spacers
between the nucleotide sequence and the bifunctional end groups are
designed to relieve steric hindrance during amidation with vancomycin
via the N-vancosaminyl site and to ensure adequate
rotational freedom of the oligo upon covalent attachment to the hydrogel
matrix. In the presence of metabolically active S. aureus, the bacterial MN is expected to cleave the oligo at the unmodified
T–T position, releasing the vancomycin with a small overhung
fragment at the N-vancosaminyl site (Figure c). We recently showed that
the minimal effective concentration of vancomycin (against S. aureus) was not significantly altered upon modification
with an N-vancosaminyl oligo(ethylene glycol) overhang,[21] which is of comparable length of the amidated
oligo fragment overhang upon MN cleavage.
Figure 1
Depiction of the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
hydrogel network and MN-triggered vancomycin release. (a) Oligonucleotide
(Oligo) sequence modified with bifunctional end groups. (b) PEGDMA-Oligo
hydrogel formation. (c) PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel formation and
MN-triggered vancomycin release.
Depiction of the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
hydrogel network and MN-triggered vancomycin release. (a) Oligonucleotide
(Oligo) sequence modified with bifunctional end groups. (b) PEGDMA-Oligo
hydrogel formation. (c) PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel formation and
MN-triggered vancomycin release.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of PEGDMA-Oligo and PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco Hydrogels
We first validated the cleavage of the oligo probe (synthesized
and purified by Integrated DNA Technologies) by MN (source: S. aureus strain ATCC 27735; Worthington Biochemical Corporation)
prior to its conjugation with vancomycin or PEGDMA hydrogel. Gel permeation
chromatography (GPC) and UV detection at 260 nm revealed two fragments
upon treatment of the oligo by MN (0.1 U/μL) in PBS (pH 7.4,
10 mM) containing a physiological concentration of calcium ions (Figure a, blue trace). In
the absence of calcium ions, MN showed very little cleavage of oligo
(Figure a, red trace).
Figure 2
MN-triggered
oligo cleavage and the antibacterial activities of PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
hydrogel in vitro. (a) GPC traces of intact oligo
(black) and oligo upon treatment with MN with (blue) and without (red)
Ca2+. (b) Cumulative vancomycin (Vanco) release from PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
hydrogel incubated with (black and blue) and without (red) MN. Differences
at all given time points were significant (p ≤
0.0001). (c) Total bacterial counts after 24 and 48 h of Xen-29 S. aureus culture in LB media containing PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco,
washed PEGDMA-Oligo/Vanco, or PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogels (n = 3; inset, corresponding IVIS image of the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco and
PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogels retrieved after 48 h in S. aureus culture). (d) Photograph (left) and IVIS image (right) of an LB
agar plate of Xen-29 S. aureus culture 24 h after
placement of PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco and PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogel discs (n = 2 shown) over the agar plate. Error bars represent standard
deviations. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001 (two-way ANOVA).
MN-triggered
oligo cleavage and the antibacterial activities of PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
hydrogel in vitro. (a) GPC traces of intact oligo
(black) and oligo upon treatment with MN with (blue) and without (red)
Ca2+. (b) Cumulative vancomycin (Vanco) release from PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
hydrogel incubated with (black and blue) and without (red) MN. Differences
at all given time points were significant (p ≤
0.0001). (c) Total bacterial counts after 24 and 48 h of Xen-29 S. aureus culture in LB media containing PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco,
washed PEGDMA-Oligo/Vanco, or PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogels (n = 3; inset, corresponding IVIS image of the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco and
PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogels retrieved after 48 h in S. aureus culture). (d) Photograph (left) and IVIS image (right) of an LB
agar plate of Xen-29 S. aureus culture 24 h after
placement of PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco and PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogel discs (n = 2 shown) over the agar plate. Error bars represent standard
deviations. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001 (two-way ANOVA).Upon confirmation of the sensitivity of the oligo
to MN cleavage, it was covalently incorporated with PEGDMA during
photopolymerization. A leaching experiment showed that 90 ± 5.0%
oligo was effectively tethered to a 15 w/v% PEGDMA hydrogel, achieving
1.1 μg oligo/mg PEGDMA incorporation content, as revealed by
the detection of untethered oligo (absorption at 260 nm) leached into
deionized (DI) water upon extensive equilibration of the PEGDMA-Oligo
hydrogel in PBS (48 h).Covalent attachment of vancomycin to
PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogel was carried out using EDC/NHS chemistry resulting
in the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel. To examine the release of covalently
tethered vancomycin from the hydrogel, PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel
discs (50 μL, 8 mm in diameter, n = 3) were
incubated in PBS (pH 7.4, 10 mM) containing a physiological concentration
of calcium ions with or without the presence of MN (0.1 and 1.0 U/μL).
The concentration of released vancomycin was monitored by UV spectroscopy
at 280 nm. As shown in Figure b, the release of vancomycin was only detected in the groups
spiked with MN, supporting cleavage of the oligo linker and release
of vancomycin by MN activity. The initial release (first 4 h) of vancomycin
was slightly higher with the higher MN concentration, although the
total vancomycin released over 24 h was the same. Assuming complete
release of vancomycin after 24 h, the amount of vancomycin loaded
on the 15 w/v% PEGDMA hydrogel matrix was 90 μg/mm3 hydrogel (or 24 mg Vanco/40 g PEGDMA; note that the minimum inhibitory
concentration of vancomycin was ∼2 μg/mL[21]). This vancomycin covalent loading content was significantly
lower than the noncovalent prophylactic antibiotics incorporation
content in commercial bone cement (e.g., 0.5–1.0 g gentamycin/40
g bone cement, 1.0 g tobramycin/40 g bone cement).[34−37]
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
Hydrogel
The therapeutic efficacy of PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel
was first evaluated by in vitro bacterial cultures.
PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco and PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogel discs (50 μL, 8
mm in diameter, n = 3) were incubated in Luria–Broth
(LB) containing 130 CFU of S. aureus at 37 °C.
To account for potential contribution from residue unconjugated vancomycin,
another control group with the same content of vancomycin physically
entrapped (without EDC/NHS) at the time of PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogel formation
was also prepared (PEGDMA-Oligo/Vanco). All hydrogels were washed
for 72 h in DI water before being placed in Xen-29 S. aureus suspension culture. The Xen29 S. aureus, emitting
bioluminescence when metabolically active due to the expression of
luciferase,[38] enables convenient visualization in vitro and longitudinal monitoring in vivo by an in vivo imaging system (IVIS-100, PerkinElmer).
As shown in Figure c, the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel was able to significantly inhibit
the bacterial growth by 8-fold after 48 h. Of note, IVIS imaging showed
no signs of bacterial attachment and colonization on the surface of
the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel upon its retrieval from the suspension
culture after 48 h whereas significant colonization of S.
aureus was detected on the PEGDMA-Oligo control hydrogel
(Figure c, inset).
The cleavage of the oligo linker by live S. aureus and the ability of released vancomycin to diffuse out of the hydrogel
to exert antibiotic activities were further validated by the clear
zone development around the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogels placed on
an agar plate of the S. aureus culture. No clear
zone was developed around the PEGDMA-Oligo control. These in vitro outcomes suggest that, when applied to the surface
of implants, the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel coating may also inhibit S. aureus surface attachment and colonization and suppress
or even eradicate bacterial growth in its vicinity.
Hydrogel Coating of Ti6Al4V IM Pins
To evaluate the
ability of PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel coating to prevent or mitigate
periprosthetic infections in vivo, we applied the
coating to the surface of Ti6Al4V IM pins emulating the metallic hardware
used in orthopedic surgeries. To enhance the adhesion and stability
of the hydrogel coating to the metallic substrate, the Ti6Al4V surface
was first treated with dopamine methacrylate (DopaMA, Figure a). The catechol group from
DopaMA is known for high affinity for surface oxides of Ti6Al4V[39] whereas the methacrylate is designed to covalently
polymerize with the PEGDMA matrix during hydrogel coating application.
Dip-coating the metallic substrate with DopaMA is expected to promote
a more uniform and stable surface coating of the functionalized PEGDMA.
The choice of the methacrylate surface group also makes it possible
to covalently bond with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement
if desired. Successful surface modification of Ti6Al4V plates (1 cm
× cm) with DopaMA was confirmed by water contact angle measurements
and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses. A statistically
significant increase in water contact angle (Figure b) was observed upon DopaMA surface coating,
consistent with the increased surface hydrophobicity due to the bonding
of the more hydrophilic catechol unit with surface oxides, exposing
the hydrophobic methacrylate toward the air. Decreases in XPS signal
intensities for Ti 2p and O 1s and an increase in intensity for C
1s were also observed upon DopaMA treatment, consistent with the surface
coverage by the organic molecules (Figure c). Hydrogel precursors for PEGDMA-Oligo
were then photopolymerized onto the DopaMA-coated Ti6Al4V surface.
As shown by dark-field optical microscopy (Figure d), the DopaMA intermediate improved the
uniformity of the PEGDMA-Oligo coating on the Ti6Al4V pins (0.5 mm
in diameter; to be inserted into mouse femoral canal in subsequent in vivo studies). Vancomycin was then covalently attached
to the hydrogel coating by EDC/NHS chemistry as described earlier.
The antibacterial capability of PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco-coated Ti6Al4V
pins was validated by in vitro bacterial culture
on LB agar plates (Figure S1).
Figure 3
Surface modification
and characterization of Ti6Al4V plates. (a) Schematic of sequential
DopaMA and PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogel coatings on Ti6Al4V substrates. (b)
Water contact angle (n = 6) of Ti6Al4V and Ti6Al4V-DopaMA.
Error bars represent standard deviations, **** p ≤
0.0001. (c) XPS scans on the Ti6Al4V surfaces before and after DopaMA
immobilization. (d) Dark field optical micrographs of PEGDMA-Oligo
coating on Ti6Al4V-DopaMA vs Ti6Al4V IM pins (1 mm in diameter). Magnification:
50×.
Surface modification
and characterization of Ti6Al4V plates. (a) Schematic of sequential
DopaMA and PEGDMA-Oligo hydrogel coatings on Ti6Al4V substrates. (b)
Water contact angle (n = 6) of Ti6Al4V and Ti6Al4V-DopaMA.
Error bars represent standard deviations, **** p ≤
0.0001. (c) XPS scans on the Ti6Al4V surfaces before and after DopaMA
immobilization. (d) Dark field optical micrographs of PEGDMA-Oligo
coating on Ti6Al4V-DopaMA vs Ti6Al4V IM pins (1 mm in diameter). Magnification:
50×.
In Vivo Antibacterial Activity of Ti6Al4V Pins
Coated with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco Hydrogel
A rodent femoral
canal infection model[40,41] was used to investigate the antibacterial
activity of the hydrogel-coated Ti6Al4V IM pins in vivo. A low dose (40 CFU) of bioluminescent Xen29 S. aureus was inoculated in the reamed femoral canal of skeletally mature
CL57BL/6 mice (6–10 weeks old, males) before an unmodified
Ti6Al4V pin, or a Ti6Al4V pin coated with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco or PEGDMA-Oligo
hydrogel, was inserted (Figure S2). Our
previous study showed that this low bacteria inoculation dose was
sufficient in establishing infection in the mouse femoral canal.[21] The degree of infection was evaluated with longitudinal
IVIS monitoring of the inoculated bacteria, quantification of total
bacterial counts on retrieved pins, longitudinal microcomputed tomography
(μCT) quantification of femoral bone changes, and histological
staining of explanted femurs at the 21 day end point.IVIS detected
bioluminescence in the femurs receiving the IM pins coated with PEGDMA-Oligo
control hydrogel at 2 days postoperation which was sustained over
the course of 21 days (Figure a, bottom panel; Figure b, red bars). The longitudinal detection of bioluminescence
in the no-vancomycin control coating group further validated the establishment
of infection with the inoculation of 40 CFU Xen29 S. aureus. By stark contrast, no obvious bioluminescence was visualized from
the femurs inserted with the IM pins coated with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
at any time point during the 21 day follow-up (Figure a, bottom panel), and the quantification
of bioluminescent signals confirmed significant reduction in intensity
by >95% at 2 days postoperation compared to the control groups
(pins with PEGDMA-Oligo coating, Figure b, black bars; or unmodified pins, Figure S3), and complete disappearance after
day 7 (Figure b, red
bars). To confirm the elimination of bacterial burden by the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
coating in vivo, the IM pins were harvested on day
21 and thoroughly vortexed (5 min in LB media) before the suspensions
were cultured on LB agar plates for bacterial counts. Consistent with
the IVIS imaging data, no bacteria were recovered from the retrieved
IM pins with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco coating, supporting complete eradication
of periprosthetically bound bacteria while >500 CFU S.
aureus were recovered from the retrieved IM pins with the
PEGDMA-Oligo control coating (Figure c).
Figure 4
Complete eradication of S. aureus inoculated
in the mouse femoral canal by PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco coating. (a) IVIS
images of mouse femurs injected with 40 CFU Xen-29 S. aureus and inserted with IM pins with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco or PEGDMA-Oligo
coatings at 2, 7, 14, and 21 days. (b) Quantification of longitudinal
bioluminescence signals of mouse femurs injected with 40 CFU Xen-29 S. aureus and inserted with the different hydrogel-coated
pins at 2, 7, 14, and 21 days (n = 14). (c) S. aureus recovery from 21 day explanted pins (n = 11). Error bars represent standard deviations. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001
(two-way ANOVA for part b; Student’s t-test
for part c).
Complete eradication of S. aureus inoculated
in the mouse femoral canal by PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco coating. (a) IVIS
images of mouse femurs injected with 40 CFU Xen-29 S. aureus and inserted with IM pins with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco or PEGDMA-Oligo
coatings at 2, 7, 14, and 21 days. (b) Quantification of longitudinal
bioluminescence signals of mouse femurs injected with 40 CFU Xen-29 S. aureus and inserted with the different hydrogel-coated
pins at 2, 7, 14, and 21 days (n = 14). (c) S. aureus recovery from 21 day explanted pins (n = 11). Error bars represent standard deviations. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001
(two-way ANOVA for part b; Student’s t-test
for part c).μCT imaging was carried out postoperation
to confirm the proper positioning of inserted pins in all groups (Figure S4), and at the 3 week end point to determine
the degree of infection within the femoral region of interest (ROI).
Established local infections (osteomyelitis) could deteriorate the
bone quality over time, causing decreases in bone volume fraction
(BVF)[42] and bone mineral density (BMD),[43] and resulting in cortical thickening[44] in the affected area. Accordingly, these properties
were quantified by end point μCT in both infected and uninfected
femurs treated with IM pins with or without hydrogel coatings. 3D
μCT axial slice images at the end point revealed osteolysis
and an increase in cortical thickness (C. Th.), most clearly observed
in the distal region of the infected femurs treated with unmodified
pins (Figure S5a) or pins coated with PEGDMA-Oligo
control hydrogel (Figure a). These changes were confirmed by the significant decreases
in BVF and BMD accompanying the increase in C. Th. in the PEGDMA-Oligo
+ S. aureus group (Figure b) and the unmodified pin + S. aureus group (Figure S5b) compared to the uninfected
groups or the infected group treated with pins coated with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco.
The PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco + S. aureus group showed no
significant differences in BVF, BMD, or C. Th. when compared to uninfected
control groups, suggesting that the coating effectively prevented
the changes in bone architecture often seen in osteomyelitis.
Figure 5
Prevention
of the development of osteomyelitis in mouse femoral canal inoculated
with S. aureus by PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco coating. (a)
3D μCT axial images of the distal femoral region 21 days after
the insertion of Ti6Al4V IM pins (pins excluded during contouring)
with different hydrogel coatings, with or without the inoculation
of 40-CFU Xen-29 S. aureus. (b) Quantification of
femoral BVF, BMD, and C. Th. of infected and uninfected femurs 21
days after the insertion of Ti6Al4V IM pins with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
or PEGDMA-Oligo coatings. n = 11–14. Error
bars represent standard deviations. * p ≤
0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01 as compared to the PEGDMA-Oligo
control coating + S. aureus group (one-way ANOVA).
(c) H&E, ALP (blue)/TRAP (red), and Gram staining (bacteria stain
blue) of explanted femurs in the infected group with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
coating or PEGDMA-Oligo control coating at 21 days postoperation.
Dashed lines outline the cortical bone; BM = bone marrow; BM* = infected
bone marrow; arrowheads indicate regions of enhanced ALP/TRAP activities;
higher magnification views of the regions within the blue and red
boxes are shown in the bottom row. Scale bars = 500 μm (top
and middle rows) or 100 μm (bottom row).
Prevention
of the development of osteomyelitis in mouse femoral canal inoculated
with S. aureus by PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco coating. (a)
3D μCT axial images of the distal femoral region 21 days after
the insertion of Ti6Al4V IM pins (pins excluded during contouring)
with different hydrogel coatings, with or without the inoculation
of 40-CFU Xen-29 S. aureus. (b) Quantification of
femoral BVF, BMD, and C. Th. of infected and uninfected femurs 21
days after the insertion of Ti6Al4V IM pins with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
or PEGDMA-Oligo coatings. n = 11–14. Error
bars represent standard deviations. * p ≤
0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01 as compared to the PEGDMA-Oligo
control coating + S. aureus group (one-way ANOVA).
(c) H&E, ALP (blue)/TRAP (red), and Gram staining (bacteria stain
blue) of explanted femurs in the infected group with PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco
coating or PEGDMA-Oligo control coating at 21 days postoperation.
Dashed lines outline the cortical bone; BM = bone marrow; BM* = infected
bone marrow; arrowheads indicate regions of enhanced ALP/TRAP activities;
higher magnification views of the regions within the blue and red
boxes are shown in the bottom row. Scale bars = 500 μm (top
and middle rows) or 100 μm (bottom row).Histological staining of explanted femurs was used
to corroborate the morphological changes observed by μCT and
to visualize any colonization or penetration of bacteria along the
endosteal surface or within the canaliculi of the cortical bone. Hematoxylin
and eosin (H&E) staining revealed normal cortical bone structure
and bone marrow morphology in the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco + S.
aureus group while pronounced cortical thickening was found
in the PEGDMA-Oligo control + S. aureus (Figure c) and unmodified
Ti6Al4V + S. aureus (Figure S6) groups, consistent with μCT findings. A highly cellularized
bone marrow canal was also detected in the infected groups treated
with unmodified pins (Figure S6, bottom
row, *) or pins with the PEGDMA-Oligo control coating (Figure c, middle row, *), consistent
with elevated cellular responses to an active local infection. No
alkaline phosphatase (ALP, blue, osteoblasts) or tartrate-resistant
acid phosphatase (TRAP, red, osteoclasts) activities, indicative of
active bone remodeling, were found in the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco + S. aureus group (Figure c and Figure S6, top rows)
or the uninfected groups (Figure S6, middle
2 rows). By contrast, infected femurs treated with unmodified pins
(Figure S6, bottom row) or pins with the
PEGDMA-Oligo control coating (Figure c, middle and bottom rows) exhibited coupled osteoblastic
and osteoclastic activities within the cortical bone, consistent with
the observed cortical thickening and enhanced remodeling within the
cortices. Gram staining revealed colonized bacteria (blue) within
the bone marrow canal of the PEGDMA-Oligo control + S. aureus (Figure c, middle
and bottom rows) and unmodified pins + S. aureus groups
(Figure S6, bottom row, inset) but not
in the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco + S. aureus group (Figure c and Figure S6, top rows) or the control groups without S. aureus inoculation (Figure S6, 2 middle rows). No bacteria were detected in the cortical bone
canaliculi by optical microscopy.These μCT and histological
findings strongly corroborated the bioluminescence data and end point
bacterial counts on the retrieved pins to demonstrate the effectiveness
of PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco-coated Ti6Al4V pins in eradicating S.
aureus within the marrow canal in a timely manner to prevent
their colonization on the implant surface or invasion into the cortical
bone. These outcomes represent a significant improvement over the
short-range suppression of bacterial colonization on Ti6Al4V IM pins
achieved by vancomycin covalently conjugated to either surface oxides[40] or to implant surface-grafted polymer brushes.[21] The on-demand release of vancomycin from the
hydrogel coating enabled the bactericidal properties of the freed
vancomycin to be exerted in the broader periprosthetic tissue environment
in a timely manner, clearing the bacteria before they had a chance
to colonize on implant surfaces or invade the bone.Scavenger
organs harvested at 21 days postoperation revealed no difference among
any of the groups treated with hydrogel-coated pins (both infected
and uninfected) versus the healthy controls (Figure S7), supporting the safety of the coatings including the subsequently
released vancomycin within the time frame examined. Such a safety
profile is not surprising given that the polymethacrylate chemistry
is employed in commercial bone cements, and the covalent vancomycin
loading dose of 0.6 μg/mg PEGDMA applied to the Ti6Al4V IM pin
was 200–400-fold lower than the common prophylactic antibiotics
loading doses in commercial bone cement.[34−37]Taken together, these in vivo results support outstanding bactericidal properties
of the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco coating applied to Ti6Al4V pins to protect
against S. aureus infections, eradicating the bacteria
from both the implant surface and its periprosthetic bony tissue environment.
The low dose of 40 CFU of S. aureus inoculated was
sufficient to establish infection in the untreated groups and emulates
a realistic clinical setting where, following standard debridement,
gross infections prior to implantation are unlikely; it supports the
validity of this model for examining the efficacy of prophylactic
bactericidal coatings. By contrast, the literature shows that, in
the absence of an MN-sensitive linker, antibiotics covalently attached
to metallic implants can only reduce the bacterial colonization/biofilm
formation on the implant surface[16,21,40] but are unable to release free-diffusing vancomycin
to the broader periprosthetic tissue space to prevent the invasion,
proliferation, and colonization to tissue and ultimately the development
of chronic infections. A limitation of the current rodent study is
the limited postoperation monitoring duration. To assess the long-term
protection of this coating strategy against periprosthetic infections
and its impact on implant osteointegration, a large animal study employing
clinically used metallic implants, with/without porous surface topography,
for up to 6 months would be desired. In addition, examining whether
this coating strategy may be extended to bone cements and dental resins
will also help determine the scope of its potential clinical translation.
Conclusions
In summary, the PEGDMA-Oligo-Vanco hydrogel
coating applied to the surface of Ti6Al4V effectively prevented S. aureus colonization on the surface of the implants and
eradicated local infection both in vitro and in vivo. The vancomycin was cleaved and released from the
hydrogel coating in the intramedullary space of mouse femurs inoculated
with S. aureus, resulting in timely eradication of S. aureus from the implant surface and within the marrow
cavity and preventing invasion of bacteria into cortical bone and
the subsequent development of osteomyelitis. Conceptually, our findings
support that early and timely bactericidal action by MN-triggered
release of antibiotics is an effective prophylactic method to bypass
the notoriously harder to treat periprosthetic biofilms and osteomyelitis.From a translational perspective, the PEG-based polymethacrylate
gelling mechanism was compatible with the solidification of bone cement
and dental resin and, thus, may be applied as prophylactic standard
care to prevent implant-associated biofilm formation and osteomyelitis.
The DopaMA intermediate coating applied to the metallic implant surfaces
ensures a stable and uniform hydrogel coating on the metallic implant
surface. Finally, the low effective antibiotic tethering dose (e.g.,
more than 2 orders of magnitude reduction compared to prophylactic
antibiotics physically blended with bone cement) and the MN-sensitive
on-demand release mechanism improve both the efficacy (timely release)
and safety of local antibiotics delivery.
Authors: Christopher S Adams; Valentin Antoci; Gerald Harrison; Payal Patal; Terry A Freeman; Irving M Shapiro; Javad Parvizi; Noreen J Hickok; Shula Radin; Paul Ducheyne Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Ben Zhang; Benjamin M Braun; Jordan D Skelly; David C Ayers; Jie Song Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Evelien Gerits; Soňa Kucharíková; Patrick Van Dijck; Martin Erdtmann; Annika Krona; Maria Lövenklev; Mirjam Fröhlich; Barbara Dovgan; Frédéric Impellizzeri; Annabel Braem; Jef Vleugels; Stijn C A Robijns; Hans P Steenackers; Jozef Vanderleyden; Katrijn De Brucker; Karin Thevissen; Bruno P A Cammue; Maarten Fauvart; Natalie Verstraeten; Jan Michiels Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: McKinley C Lawson; Richard Shoemaker; Kevin B Hoth; Christopher N Bowman; Kristi S Anseth Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: T Fintan Moriarty; Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Mario Morgenstern; Marloes I Hofstee; Alejandro Vallejo Diaz; James E Cassat; Britt Wildemann; Melissa Depypere; Edward M Schwarz; R Geoff Richards Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Tania Jiménez; Juliana Botero; Dorleta Otaegui; Javier Calvo; Frank J Hernandez; Eider San Sebastian Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 7.446