PURPOSE: To assess the long-term correction of moderate to high myopia using a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central port design. METHODS: Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density (ECD), vault, and adverse events over a 5-year period were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 147 eyes (83 patients) were evaluated. Mean postoperative UDVA and CDVA were 0.05 ± 0.11 and 0.02 ± 0.08 logMAR at 1 year and 0.13 ± 0.18 and 0.02 ± 0.09 logMAR at 5 years, respectively. More than 95% of eyes achieved CDVA of 20/25 or better at both follow-up periods. CDVA was unchanged or improved from one to three or more lines in all eyes. Preoperatively, mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -9.20 ± 3.02 diopters (D). At 1 year, the mean SE was -0.17 ± 0.26 D, with 91.53% of eyes within ±0.50 D and 100% of eyes within ±1.00 D of the target. At 5 years, the mean SE was -0.44 ± 0.47 D, with 67.4% of eyes within ±0.50 D and 90.1% of eyes within ±1.00 D of the target. Mean IOP was 12.74 ± 1.65 and 13.0 ± 2.03 mm Hg, at 1 and 5 years, respectively. No significant rise in IOP (> 20 mm Hg) occurred during the follow-up period. Mean ECD was 2,696 ± 358 and 2,645 ± 359 cells/mm2 at 1 and 5 years, respectively, representing a non-significant loss of 0.43% from preoperative values (P = .304). Mean vault changed significantly from 398 ± 187 µm at 1 year to 340 ± 163 µm at 5 years (P < .001). No intraoperative or postoperative complications or adverse events occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The good long-term outcomes found in this study support the use of this lens with a central port design for the correction of moderate to high myopia. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(3):169-176.]. Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.
PURPOSE: To assess the long-term correction of moderate to high myopia using a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central port design. METHODS: Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density (ECD), vault, and adverse events over a 5-year period were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 147 eyes (83 patients) were evaluated. Mean postoperative UDVA and CDVA were 0.05 ± 0.11 and 0.02 ± 0.08 logMAR at 1 year and 0.13 ± 0.18 and 0.02 ± 0.09 logMAR at 5 years, respectively. More than 95% of eyes achieved CDVA of 20/25 or better at both follow-up periods. CDVA was unchanged or improved from one to three or more lines in all eyes. Preoperatively, mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -9.20 ± 3.02 diopters (D). At 1 year, the mean SE was -0.17 ± 0.26 D, with 91.53% of eyes within ±0.50 D and 100% of eyes within ±1.00 D of the target. At 5 years, the mean SE was -0.44 ± 0.47 D, with 67.4% of eyes within ±0.50 D and 90.1% of eyes within ±1.00 D of the target. Mean IOP was 12.74 ± 1.65 and 13.0 ± 2.03 mm Hg, at 1 and 5 years, respectively. No significant rise in IOP (> 20 mm Hg) occurred during the follow-up period. Mean ECD was 2,696 ± 358 and 2,645 ± 359 cells/mm2 at 1 and 5 years, respectively, representing a non-significant loss of 0.43% from preoperative values (P = .304). Mean vault changed significantly from 398 ± 187 µm at 1 year to 340 ± 163 µm at 5 years (P < .001). No intraoperative or postoperative complications or adverse events occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The good long-term outcomes found in this study support the use of this lens with a central port design for the correction of moderate to high myopia. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(3):169-176.]. Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.
Authors: Virgilio Galvis; John F Villamil; María Fernanda Acuña; Paul A Camacho; Jesús Merayo-Lloves; Alejandro Tello; Sandra Lizeth Zambrano; Juan José Rey; Juan Vicente Espinoza; Angélica María Prada Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Elena Martínez-Plaza; Alberto López-Miguel; Alberto López-de la Rosa; Miguel J Maldonado Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2022-10-19 Impact factor: 2.029
Authors: Pedro Tañá-Rivero; Francisco Pastor-Pascual; Marceliano Crespo; José L Rodríguez-Prats; José J Muñoz-Tomás; Robert Montés-Micó Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Soraya M R Jonker; Tos T J M Berendschot; Isabelle E Y Saelens; Noël J C Bauer; Rudy M M A Nuijts Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 1.848
Authors: Juan Gros-Otero; Samira Ketabi; Rafael Cañones-Zafra; Montserrat Garcia-Gonzalez; Cesar Villa-Collar; Santiago Casado; Miguel A Teus Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 2.209