| Literature DB >> 30846692 |
Yihua Chen1, Nengxu Li1, Ligang Wang1, Liang Li1, Ziqi Xu1, Haoyang Jiao1, Pengfei Liu2, Cheng Zhu2, Huachao Zai2, Mingzi Sun3, Wei Zou4, Shuai Zhang5, Guichuan Xing6, Xinfeng Liu5, Jianpu Wang4, Dongdong Li7, Bolong Huang3, Qi Chen2, Huanping Zhou8.
Abstract
Further minimizing the defect state density in the semiconducting absorber is vital to boost the power conversion efficiency of solar cells approaching Shockley-Queisser limit. However, it lacks a general strategy to control the precursor chemistry for defects density reduction in the family of iodine based perovskite. Here the alkaline environment in precursor solution is carefully investigated as an effective parameter to suppress the incident iodine and affects the crystallization kinetics during film fabrication, via rationale adjustment of the alkalinity of additives. Especially, a 'residual free' weak alkaline is proposed not only to shrink the bandgap of the absorber by modulating the stoichiometry of organic cation, but also to improve the open circuit voltage in the resultant device. Consequently, the certified efficiency of 20.87% (Newport) is achieved with one of the smallest voltage deficits of 413 mV in the planar heterojunction perovskite solar cell.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30846692 PMCID: PMC6405758 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09093-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Suppression of I2 impurity via alkaline additives. UV-vis absorption spectra of the organic cation solution, which is used to prepare the perovskite films, with different amounts of (a) FAAc, (b) CH3COONa, (c) NaHCO3, (d) NaOH, and (e) KOH ethanol solution. f Normalized absorbance for organic cation solution with different additives as a function of the volume
Fig. 2Morphology, phase, and carrier lifetime analysis. SEM images for the perovskite films deposited on SnO2-coated ITO glass prepared from the precursor solution with (a) no additive, (b) FAAc, (c) CH3COONa, and (d) NaOH ethanol solution, with a scale bar of 1 μm. e X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern for the perovskite films deposited on SnO2-coated ITO glass prepared from the precursor solution with different alkaline additives. f XRD pattern for the perovskite films with NO additive, MA, and FAAc ethanol solution. g Time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) spectra for the perovskite films deposited on glass prepared from the precursor solution with different alkaline additives
Fig. 3Crystallization kinetics control of perovskite films. a Real-time UV-vis absorption spectra for the perovskite films without annealing prepared under different alkalinity environments. In situ absorption measurement for perovskite films with addition of (b) FAAc or (c) NaOH. The inset figures are derived from the change of absorption intensity (∆I) for each sample at different times and the y-axis is the right one (Time). d Schematic illustration for the impacts of alkalinity on the crystallization kinetics of perovskite films. e Activation energies of the α- and δ-phase of FAPbI3 in the dependence of OH− concentration
Fig. 4Weak alkaline additives to reduce defect state density. Color plots of normalized steady-state PL spectra for (a) PVSK and (b) PVSK–FA at different temperatures from 78 to 350 K. c Corresponding steady-state PL spectra for both films at various temperatures from 250 to 350 K. d The PL quantum efficiency of PVSK and PVSK–FA films as a function of excitation power. The admittance spectra of the (e) PVSK and (f) PVSK–FA devices measured at a temperature from 250 to 350 K with a step of 10 K. g The corresponding Arrhenius plots of the characteristic frequencies to extract the defect activation energy (Ea) for both devices. h Trap density of states (tDOS) for both devices obtained by thermal admittance spectroscopy at room temperature
Fig. 5Photovoltaic device performance. a Current density–voltage curves for PVSK and PVSK–FA devices. b Left part: the UV-vis and PL spectra of for the PVSK and PVSK–FA films. Right part: the histogram of VOC for the PVSK and PVSK–FA devices and the curve represents Gaussian function fit to the statistics data. c The champion device performance under reverse scan (1.2 to –0.1 V) and forward scan (–0.1 to 1.2 V), with a scan rate of 40 mV s–1. d Steady-state current density and power conversion efficiency holding the voltage at the maximum power point (0.95 V) for the PVSK–FA device. All these photovoltage characterizations were carried out under standard AM 1.5 radiation at ambient condition. e The transient photovoltage decay curves and (f) VOC as a function of light intensity for the PVSK and PVSK–FA devices