Hybrid (organic-inorganic) multication lead halide perovskites hold promise for a new generation of easily processable solar cells. Best performing compositions to date are multiple-cation solid alloys of formamidinium (FA), methylammonium (MA), cesium, and rubidium lead halides which provide power conversion efficiencies up to around 22%. Here, we elucidate the atomic-level nature of Cs and Rb incorporation into the perovskite lattice of FA-based materials. We use 133Cs, 87Rb, 39K, 13C, and 14N solid-state MAS NMR to probe microscopic composition of Cs-, Rb-, K-, MA-, and FA-containing phases in double-, triple-, and quadruple-cation lead halides in bulk and in a thin film. Contrary to previous reports, we have found no proof of Rb or K incorporation into the 3D perovskite lattice in these systems. We also show that the structure of bulk mechanochemical perovskites bears close resemblance to that of thin films, making them a good benchmark for structural studies. These findings provide fundamental understanding of previously reported excellent photovoltaic parameters in these systems and their superior stability.
Hybrid (organic-inorganic) multication lead halideperovskites hold promise for a new generation of easily processable solar cells. Best performing compositions to date are multiple-cation solid alloys of formamidinium (FA), methylammonium (MA), cesium, and rubidium lead halides which provide power conversion efficiencies up to around 22%. Here, we elucidate the atomic-level nature of Cs and Rb incorporation into the perovskite lattice of FA-based materials. We use 133Cs, 87Rb, 39K, 13C, and 14N solid-state MAS NMR to probe microscopic composition of Cs-, Rb-, K-, MA-, and FA-containing phases in double-, triple-, and quadruple-cation lead halides in bulk and in a thin film. Contrary to previous reports, we have found no proof of Rb or K incorporation into the 3D perovskite lattice in these systems. We also show that the structure of bulk mechanochemical perovskites bears close resemblance to that of thin films, making them a good benchmark for structural studies. These findings provide fundamental understanding of previously reported excellent photovoltaic parameters in these systems and their superior stability.
Hybrid organic–inorganic
multication lead halideperovskites
(HOPs) have taken the field of photovoltaics by storm since their
first successful application as sensitizers for solar cells.[1] They generate intense interest as a conceivable
alternative to traditional silicon solar cells, as they can be processed
using various vapor-[2] and solution-based,[3−5] techniques. Since the first report, power conversion efficiencies
(PCE) have increased from 3.8% to about 22%.[6] Key to this remarkable progress was the notion of alloying structurally
similar perovskites into multication and multianion lead HOPs.[6]A generic HOP can be represented by an
ABX3 formula,
in which A stands for a monovalent cation such as
methylammonium, (CH3NH3+, MA), formamidinium
(CH3(NH2)2+, FA), cesium,
or rubidium. A cations are confined within a cuboctahedral
cage formed by [BX6]4− octahedra. B is typically a divalent metal such as Pb2+,
Sn2+, or Ge2+, and X is a halide:
I–, Br– or Cl–. Current champion HOP materials, in terms of their photovoltaic
performance and light/moisture stability, are double- (MA/FA,[7−9] Cs/FA,[10−13] Rb/FA,[14] K/MA[15]), triple- (Cs/MA/FA,[16] Rb/MA/FA[17,18]), and quadruple-cation (Rb/Cs/MA/FA)[6] lead halide solid alloys with one (I) or two (I, Br) halides. They
are all based on FA as the majority cation owing to the fact that
the black α-FAPbI3 phase has a bandgap of 1.40 eV,
which is close to the Shockley–Queisser limit (1.34 eV), a
factor crucial in the design of efficient PV materials.[19] However, the α phase of FAPbI3 is thermodynamically unstable under ambient conditions, and it spontaneously
transforms into photoinactive yellow δ-FAPbI3. Incorporation
of MA, Cs, and Rb was found to alleviate the problem of phase stability,
but the consequences reach well beyond that, since devices based on
mixed-cation phases consistently exhibit higher open-circuit voltage
(VOC), short-circuit current (JSC), fill factor (FF), PCE, and long-term stability
toward light and moisture.While several hypotheses have been
put forward to explain these
results, there is still no satisfactory understanding of the microscopic
structure in these mixed-cation systems. For example, powder X-ray
diffraction (pXRD) is currently the method of choice to assess whether
the incorporation of an ancillary cation was successful. This is typically
inferred from a shift (on the order of 0.05°) of the main reflection
of the α-FAPbI3 phase (14.00°) to higher angles,
indicative of a decrease in lattice constant, and accompanied by a
shift in photoluminescence (PL) spectra.[11,16] However, diffraction-based methods lack information about the noncrystalline
and disordered regions of the sample, and they are not quantitative.
Solid-state NMR, on the other hand, seems to be perfectly suited for
the task. It has been used in several recent examples to probe PVperovskites.[20−25] It not only provides quantitative information but also is capable
of detecting all species of a given nucleus that are present in the
sample, regardless of the degree of crystallinity. For instance, recently
Rossini et al. have shown that 207Pb NMR chemical shifts
and line shapes are a sensitive probe of the halogen coordination
in pure and mixed-halogen HOPs. Our group has very recently used solid-state
NMR to elucidate microscopic phase composition and segregation in
MA/FA HOPs.[26]Here we show that in
Cs/FA solid alloys, cesium is incorporated
into the perovskite lattice as Cs+ and can take up to 15
mol % of the A site. Above this ratio, it separates into a mixture
of disordered δ-CsPbI3 and free δ-CsPbI3. Similarly, we confirm incorporation of Cs+ into
the state-of-the-art triple- (Cs/MA/FA) and quadruple-cation (Rb/Cs/MA/FA)
PV perovskites. In contrast, we find that Rb+ is not incorporated
into the 3D perovskite lattice at any composition studied here. Rather,
it separates into RbPbI3 (in Rb-doped systems with only
iodine), mixed cesium–rubidium lead iodide (in Cs- and Rb-doped
systems with only iodine), or a mixture of rubidium halides, mixed
cesium–rubidium lead iodide, and various rubidium lead bromides
(in Rb/Cs/MA/FA systems with bromine and iodine). The improved performance
of the Rb containing materials is thus not due to incorporation into
the main perovskite lattice. We suggest that the performance is improved
since the Rb compounds present can potentially act as a passivation
layer. In the case of K/MA, pure MAPbI3 is formed, accompanied
by unreacted KI.All of the above results were obtained for
samples prepared by
mechanochemistry which has emerged as an appealing method for synthesizing
large quantities of high-quality perovskites for PV applications.[27] We thus address the question of whether bulk
mechanochemically synthesized perovskites are a good representation
of the thin films used in PV devices. Comparison of NMR spectra from
a bulk mechanochemical triple-cation Cs/MA/FA perovskite and a thin
film prepared by spin-coating[3] shows no
significant differences between the two materials, validating that
bulk mechanochemical perovskites can be used to obtain structural
information about newly developed HOP systems.
Experimental
Section
Perovskite Synthesis and Sample Preparation
We focus
on the following perovskite materials of practical importance: CsFA1–PbI3 (x = 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.30, abbreviated
as “CsFA1–”); Cs0.10(MA0.17FA0.83)0.9Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 (“CsMAFA”, prepared according to Saliba et
al.);[16] RbFA1–PbI3 (x = 0.1, 0.2, abbreviated as “RbFA1-x”); a Rb/Cs/MA/FA/Pb/Br/I material prepared
according to Saliba et al. (“RbCsMAFA(Br,I)”),[6] and K0.10MA0.90PbI3.[15] We also prepared the following
materials with only iodine as counterion: Rb0.05Cs0.10FA0.85PbI3, Rb0.05MA0.25FA0.70PbI3, Rb0.05Cs0.10MA0.25FA0.60PbI3, abbreviated
respectively as RbCsFA(I), RbMAFA(I), and RbCsMAFA(I). Further, we
made the following compounds to use as references: δ-CsPbI3 (yellow), δ-RbPbI3 (yellow); Cs0.5Rb0.5PbI3 (pale yellow); and RbPb2Br5 (white). We attempted to prepare Rb4PbBr6,[28] but instead we obtained a mixture
of RbBr and an unknown rubidium lead bromide whose pXRD pattern did
not correspond to any known Rb/Pb/Br phase in the ICDD database. We
designate this composition as “phase X” and report its
pXRD pattern and NMR parameters (single Rb site with CQ = 3.4 MHz) in the SI. pXRD
patterns of all the materials are given in the SI.All materials were prepared by mechanochemistry,
as described previously by Prochowicz et al. and annealed at 140 °C
for 10 min to reproduce the thin-film synthetic procedure.[27,29] The thin film of CsMAFA was prepared according to the procedure
described previously, except an uncoated glass substrate was used
instead of FTO-coated glass.[16] Samples
were packed into 3.2 mm rotors under inert dry nitrogen atmosphere.
Thin-Film Preparation
The CsMAFA(Br,I) perovskite precursor
solution was prepared according to the previously published recipe.[16] The solution was deposited onto a glass substrate
(3.5 cm2) by spin coating in a two-step program at 1000
and 6000 rpm for 10 and 20 s, respectively. During the second step,
100 μL of chlorobenzene was dripped onto the spinning substrate
10 s prior to the end of the program. The substrates were then annealed
at 100 °C for 30 min in a drybox. The films were then scratched
off of the glass substrates using a stainless steel spatula. Twelve
glass substrates were used in total (42 cm2) yielding about
1.5 mg of a solid perovskite which was then immediately transferred
into an NMR rotor.
NMR Measurements
Variable-temperature 133Cs (65.6 MHz), 87Rb (163.6 MHz), 14N (32.1
MHz), 39K (23.4 MHz), 13C (125.7 MHz), and 1H (500.0 MHz) NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance
III 11.7 T spectrometer equipped with a 3.2 mm low-temperature CPMAS
probe. 133Cs, 87Rb, and 39K shifts
were referenced to 1 M aqueous solutions of the respective alkali
metal chlorides, using solid CsI (δ = 271.05 ppm), RbI (δ
= 177.08 ppm), and KI (δ = 59.3 ppm) as secondary references.[30]
133Cs and 87Rb Chemical
Shift Calculations
The perovskite (Cs/Rb/FA)PbI3 clusters and the reference
(Rb/Cs)I clusters were generated as described in the SI. Chemical shift calculations were performed at DFT level
using the GGA BP86[31,32] functional with all-electron
TZ2P basis functions (triple-ζ in the valence with two polarization
functions) including relativistic effects (with spin–orbit
coupling) with the ZORA[33−35] approximation and the Grimme[36] dispersion correction implemented within the
Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF)[37,38] suite.The calculated chemical shieldings were converted to chemical shifts
by a linear correlation.For the linear correlation,
only the experimental and calculated
chemical shifts of the reference (Cs/Rb)I and the hexagonal (yellow)
(Cs/Rb)PbI3 structures were used, leading to a reference
shielding and a slope of σref = 2768.6, b = −0.825 for Rb and σref = 3480.1, b = −0.54 for Cs. In both cases, we ignored second-order
quadrupolar contributions to the shift since they are zero in the
cubic compounds (CsI, RbI) and negligible in CsPbI3 (calculated CQ of 0.4 MHz leading to a shift of <1 ppm)
and RbPbI3 (at most 4 ppm given the fitted CQ of around 2 MHz).
Results and Discussion
Figure shows a
schematic representation of the crystal structures of the studied
materials. The starting point for all solid alloys investigated in
this study is the perfect cubic perovskite structure of α-FAPbI3 (Figure a).[19] Solid alloys can be formed by replacing some
FA cations inside the cuboctahedral cages by MA and conceivably Cs
and Rb (Figure b),
accompanied by gradual departure from cubic symmetry. Excess Cs+ and Rb+ ions can separate into a thermodynamically
stable, yellow, nonperovskite (orthorhombic, Pnma space group) phase: δ-CsPbI3 or RbPbI3, respectively (Figure c). We note that to date there are only two single-crystal studies
reported on mixed-cation (MA/FA)[39] and
(Cs/FA)[40] systems.
Figure 1
Schematic representation
of structural motifs investigated in this
study: (a) black single-cation α-FAPbI3; (b) black
double- (CsFA, RbFA), triple- (CsMAFA), or quadruple-cation (RbCsMAFA)
compositions (X = I, Br); and (c) yellow nonperovskite δ-FAPbI3.
Schematic representation
of structural motifs investigated in this
study: (a) black single-cation α-FAPbI3; (b) black
double- (CsFA, RbFA), triple- (CsMAFA), or quadruple-cation (RbCsMAFA)
compositions (X = I, Br); and (c) yellow nonperovskite δ-FAPbI3.
Cesium Phases from 133Cs MAS NMR
In order
to determine cesium incorporation into PV perovskites, we performed 133Cs MAS NMR on the most prominent cesium-containing materials
recently reported in the literature (Figure ). The spectrum of δ-CsPbI3, (Figure a) contains
one relatively narrow (fwhm: ∼ 350 Hz) peak centered at 240
ppm, accompanied by a manifold of spinning sidebands (SSB), spaced
by the MAS frequency. The longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of this species is about 100 s.
Figure 2
Quantitative 133Cs echo-detected
MAS spectra of various
(Cs/Rb/MA/FA)Pb(Br/I)3 systems at 298 K and (a) 10 kHz
MAS and (b–j) 20 kHz MAS acquired within 1 h after annealing.
Asterisks (*) indicate spinning sidebands, and † is a transmitter
artifact.
Quantitative 133Cs echo-detected
MAS spectra of various
(Cs/Rb/MA/FA)Pb(Br/I)3 systems at 298 K and (a) 10 kHz
MAS and (b–j) 20 kHz MAS acquired within 1 h after annealing.
Asterisks (*) indicate spinning sidebands, and † is a transmitter
artifact.Moving on to the CsFA1– solid alloys
(Figure b–e),
one sees a new, much broader peak whose
position and line width depend on cesium content (shifts: 13, 18,
26, and 37 ppm, fwhm: 1169 ± 21, 858 ± 15, 1477 ± 51,
and 2261 ± 51 Hz for Cs mole ratio x = 0.10,
0.15, 0.20, and 0.30, respectively). This new species is peculiar
in that its 133Cs signal position and relaxation time are
a strong function of temperature.Figure shows the
temperature dependence of the 133Cs shift and line shapes
in Cs0.20FA0.80 between 100 and 330 K. The corresponding
smooth change in the 133Cs shift in this temperature range
covers about 100 ppm and is accompanied by a change in relaxation
time from 26 s (at 298 K) to 3 s (at 103 K). This behavior is consistent
with the Cs+ cation being incorporated into the cuboctahedral
space and interacting strongly with the [PbI6]4− lattice. The change in relaxation time is caused by the change dynamics
of the nearby nuclei and/or a change in the 133Cs quadrupolar
coupling as the lattice changes with temperature. Indeed, upon cooling
the lattice undergoes successive first- and second-order displacive
phase transitions attributed to gradual freezing of phonon modes associated
with the rotational movement of the [PbI6]4− octahedra.[41,42] The progressive broadening of
the resonances is most likely caused by a distribution of sites with
slightly different chemical environments that is created upon the
freezing of [PbI6]4− librations. Conversely,
no such behavior is present in pure δ-CsPbI3 (or
CsI) which preserve sharp lines across the whole temperature range,
indicating no phase transitions (Figure S9a,c).
Figure 3
(a) Variable-temperature solid-state 133Cs MAS NMR spectra
of Cs0.20FA0.80. (b) Temperature dependence
of the 133Cs shift (measured at the maximum of the most
intense peak). Spinning sidebands are marked with asterisks (*).
(a) Variable-temperature solid-state 133Cs MAS NMR spectra
of Cs0.20FA0.80. (b) Temperature dependence
of the 133Cs shift (measured at the maximum of the most
intense peak). Spinning sidebands are marked with asterisks (*).In attempt to elucidate the change
in shifts, we carried out fully
relativistic DFT 133Cs chemical shift calculations for
two FAPbI3 lattices in which one FA was replaced by Cs
in (a) a perfectly cubic and (b) a tetragonal perovskite lattice arrangement.
We have found that distorting the lattice from cubic to tetragonal
leads to an increase in 133Cs shift of the same magnitude
as that observed experimentally (Figure S13). That said, this result is only qualitative since the Cs0.20FA0.80 lattice, unlike that of α-FAPbI3, is not perfectly cubic. This comes about because incorporation
of cesium leads to lattice distortions and in turn to reduction in
symmetry of the environment in which the FA cation is reorienting.
We have previously shown that 14N MAS NMR is very sensitive
to such distortions owing to the interaction of its quadrupole moment
with the electric field gradient created by the distorted lattice,
with higher asymmetry leading to broader 14N spectral envelopes.[26] Cs-induced lattice distortion is indeed clearly
evidenced by 14N MAS spectra of the two materials, with
cesium incorporation leading to a spectral envelope nearly 4 times
broader than that of the pure α-FAPbI3 phase (Figure S10).To corroborate that the signal
close to 30 ppm at 298 K originates
from Cs+ incorporated inside the perovskite lattice, we
carried out a through-space heteronuclear correlation experiment (HETCOR),
which maps all cesium chemical environments that are in the immediate
spatial vicinity of any protons (Figure ). The experiment was carried out at 100
K to take advantage of the faster proton relaxation at low temperature.[26] The cross-peak can be easily assigned, since
there is only one source of protons in the sample, to Cs+ dipolar coupled to FA. It is thus Cs+ inside the 3D perovskite
lattice, which correlates with the nearby FA protons.[26]
Figure 4
A 1H–133Cs HETCOR of Cs0.20FA0.80 at 100 K and 12 kHz MAS.
A 1H–133Cs HETCOR of Cs0.20FA0.80 at 100 K and 12 kHz MAS.Another characteristic feature of the spectra in Figure b–e is the
resonance
around 240 ppm corresponding to the δ-CsPbI3 phase.
In Cs0.10FA0.90 and Cs0.15FA0.85, it is absent, whereas in Cs0.20FA0.80 and Cs0.30FA0.70, it is clearly present, confirming
phase separation takes place in these systems above 10% doping. Note
that this resonance has a slightly broader component shifted to higher
values, visible in Figure d. This broadened signal can tentatively be assigned to a
disordered interface region between the CsFA alloy and pure δ-CsPbI3.A comment is in order regarding the stability of CsFA1– compositions.
Photovoltaic parameters measured on devices fabricated using Cs0.15FA0.85PbI3 have been monitored over
the course of 14 days and found stable during that period.[10] Nazarenko et al. have reported that single crystals
of CsFA1–PbI3 compositions are stable up to 20 days after
which time the presence of hexagonal δ-FAPbI3 can
be detected.[40] Here we find that mechanochemically
prepared CsFA1– compositions are thermodynamically unstable and give off δ-CsPbI3 over time. For example, the composition denoted Cs0.10FA0.90 is, based on the quantitative 133Cs
spectrum acquired immediately after annealing, a phase pure perovskite
but separates into a mixture of Cs0.07FA0.93PbI3 and δ-CsPbI3 after 24 h. Similarly,
Cs0.20FA0.80 after annealing is a mixture of
Cs0.16FA0.84PbI3 and δ-CsPbI3, but the same preparation after 5 days contains Cs0.14FA0.86PbI3 and a correspondingly larger amount
of δ-CsPbI3. The Cs0.30FA0.70 composition is particularly unstable reproducibly yielding a transitory
Cs0.23FA0.77PbI3 perovskite (within
30 min from annealing) which quickly loses the incorporated cesium
in favor of δ-CsPbI3 and becomes Cs0.15FA0.85PbI3 (after 1 h), Cs0.08FA0.92PbI3 (after 2 h), and finally stabilizing as
Cs0.03FA0.97PbI3 after 5 h. Note
that the shortest quantitative spectrum takes 30 min to acquire so
it is possible that in this sample more cesium is transiently incorporated
during annealing, leading to lattice instability and, as a consequence,
rapid cesium release. We did not further investigate the reasons behind
this instability. The fact that its timescale is much faster than
that observed in single crystals suggests it may be related to grain
boundaries, with smaller crystallites promoting cesium loss from the
3D perovskite lattice. Notably, this process stops at 100 K.The performance of Cs-containing materials continues to increase
as loadings increase to 15%, consistent with full cesium incorporation
in the Cs0.15FA0.85 composition (Figure c).[10] Lee et al. have reported enhanced photo- and moisture stability
of CsFA1– solid alloys, which they attributed to stronger interaction
between FA and I– in the perovskite.[11] Other studies have confirmed increased stability
both experimentally and theoretically, by rationalizing through entropic
stabilization of the cubic α-FAPbI3 structure.[10,13] Poor stability of the pristine α-FAPbI3 phase at
ambient conditions against humidity, as well as elevated temperature,
has been explained by its propensity to decompose into ammonia and sym-triazine.[41] Further, the
presence of excess δ-CsPbI3 explains the consistently
poorer photovoltaic parameters measured on CsFA1– devices with x > 0.15.[10] It is noteworthy
that an opposite effect has been reported for excess PbI2 which typically led to improved photovoltaic parameters but has
been shown to be detrimental to device stability.[43]Cesium has been shown to improve PV parameters and
stability in
triple- and quadruple-cation compositions in a similar way. Figure f,j shows 133Cs spectra of two of the currently best performing solid alloys,
CsMAFA(Br,I) and RbCsMAFA(Br,I), respectively. In both cases, a broad
peak of Cs+ incorporated into the perovskite lattice is
present. RbCsMAFA(Br,I) exhibits an additional broad peak (δ
= 255.4 ± 0.3 ppm, fwhm = 2662 ± 55 Hz) making up 47% of
the whole amount of cesium in this sample, markedly different in appearance
from that of δ-CsPbI3 (δ = 239.32 ± 0.03
ppm, fwhm = 367 ± 7 Hz). Given the similarity between the hexagonal
lattices of δ-CsPbI3 and RbPbI3, we suggest
it might belong to a mixed cesium–rubidium lead iodide phase.
This was confirmed by preparing pure Cs0.5Rb0.5PbI3 (Figure i) which yielded a very similar signal (δ = 253.2 ±
0.2 ppm, fwhm = 2034 ± 27 Hz). We note that the exact shift and
line width are expected to vary depending on the exact Rb/Cs ratio
in such 1D mixed-cation hexagonal phase. To exclude the possibility
of this peak being due to a bromine-containing species, we prepared
two more Cs/Rb compositions (Figure g,h) featuring only iodine as counterion, both of which
gave the same resonance (RbCsFA(I): δ = 247.3 ± 0.3 ppm,
fwhm = 1468 ± 66 Hz, RbCsMAFA(I): δ = 248.4 ± 0.3
ppm, fwhm = 1592 ± 63 Hz), confirming the assignment to Cs0.5Rb0.5PbI3. This finding implies that
rubidium competes with cesium incorporation into the perovskite lattice
by forming a stable hexagonal mixed Cs/Rb phase. In fact, in the case
of pure iodides (RbCsFA(I) and RbCsMAFA(I)), there is more cesium
bound in the mixed cesium–rubidium hexagonal lead iodide (92
and 84%, respectively) than there is cesium incorporated into the
perovskite (8 and 16%, respectively) (Figure g,h). The addition of bromine (in RbCsMAFA(Br,I))
alleviates this effect to certain extent (Figure j).
Rubidium Phases from 87Rb MAS
NMR
We now
investigate the fate of rubidium in rubidium-doped multication perovskites. Figure shows solid-state 87Rb MAS NMR spectra of 10 compositions studied here. The spectra
of RbFA1-x and RbMAFA(I) perfectly
match that of RbPbI3, indicating that the only form in
which Rb+ exists in these systems is a separate RbPbI3 phase. Rb is not incorporated into the MAFAperovskite lattice.
This finding challenges previous reports on rubidium incorporation
into the perovskite lattice which were based on shifts observed in
pXRD diffractograms and PL spectra.[14,17,18] A very recent work by Hu et al. explains these shifts
using EDX in terms of rubidium-induced bromide extraction, which is
in excellent agreement with our findings described in the next paragraph.[44] Similarly to the Cs-doped HOPs, Rb-doped materials
also exhibit improved long-term stability under high humidity conditions
and light irradiation.[14,17,18] We suggest that this can be explained by passivation of the perovskite
phase by a fully inorganic RbPbI3 layer, less prone to
decomposition.
Figure 5
11.7 T Solid-state 87Rb echo-detected MAS (20
kHz, 298
K) spectra of various (Cs/Rb/MA/FA)Pb(Br/I)3 systems. The
corresponding 100 K 13C CP MAS spectra of a–c, e,
f, and j show only one FA signal corresponding to it being in a 3D
perovskite environment (Figure S11).
11.7 T Solid-state 87Rb echo-detected MAS (20
kHz, 298
K) spectra of various (Cs/Rb/MA/FA)Pb(Br/I)3 systems. The
corresponding 100 K 13C CP MAS spectra of a–c, e,
f, and j show only one FA signal corresponding to it being in a 3D
perovskite environment (Figure S11).As mentioned above, we find that
cesium tends to form a stable
Cs0.5Rb0.5PbI3 phase in the presence
of rubidium. This is confirmed here, as the 87Rb spectra
of RbCsFA(I) and RbCsMAFA(I) both match that of Cs0.5Rb0.5PbI3 (Figure e–g). To ensure this is not simply sheer coincidence,
we measured the same spectrum at 100 K. If this rubidium species were
to be incorporated inside the perovskite lattice, then one should
expect their shift to be strongly temperature dependent, as was the
case for cesium (Figure ). On the contrary, we observed only a small shift of ∼6 ppm,
consistent with ordinary lattice shrinkage at low temperatures (Figure S9b,d).[45] In
addition, we carried out a fully relativistic DFT calculation of the 87Rb shift expected for a rubidium cation incorporated into
the α-FAPbI3 lattice, using the known RbI and δ-RbPbI3 shifts as a reference (see the SI for details). We obtained a value of −117 ppm, which is very
different from the shift observed experimentally (Figure e,f,j).Figure j shows
a 87Rb MAS spectrum of the state-of-the-art quadruple-cation
composition developed by Saliba et al.[6] Again, there is no evidence for incorporation of the Rb into the
CsMAFAperovskite lattice. In this case, since this composition also
contains bromide anions, rubidium can be expected to form both iodide-
and bromide-containing species. The spectrum in Figure j exhibits a relatively sharp peak at 150
ppm which corresponds to a pure RbBr phase.[30] Pure RbI is expected at 177 ppm,[30] and
in this sample, it is not present. That said, rubidium is known to
form a continuum of mixed RbI1–Br phases,[46] which explains the distribution of shifts in the region, delimited
by the values of pure RbI and RbBr (150–177 ppm). The mixed
RbI1–Br phases make up 38% of rubidium content in this sample and
are responsible for bromide depletion from the perovskite, the reason
behind the previously observed XRD and PL shifts, at the time ascribed
to rubidium incorporation into the perovskite lattice.[44] The other, much broader peak centered around
50 ppm can be attributed to a mixture of rubidium lead halides. Its
breadth is consistent with the presence of RbPbI3, Cs0.5Rb0.5PbI3 (Figure d,g), and “phase X” (Figure i). The presence
of RbPb2Br5 cannot be excluded as its sharp
signal is overlapping with the broad peak of RbCsMAFA(Br,I). The only
other known rubidium lead bromide is Rb4PbBr6,[28] and since we did not succeed in synthesizing
it by mechanochemistry, its presence in this composition is unlikely.
As before, and also in this case, the two 87Rb signals
in RbCsMAFA(Br,I) do not broaden or shift significantly between 298
and 100 K (Figure S9e), which provides
further evidence that these rubidium species are not involved in the
displacive phase transition of the perovskite lattice, as was the
case for incorporated Cs+ ions.
Figure 6
(a) Low-temperature (100
K) 13C CP MAS spectra, (b)
echo-detected 14N MAS spectra at 300 K and 5 kHz MAS of
MAPbI3 (top) and K0.10MA0.90PbI3 (bottom), and (c) echo-detected 39K spectrum of
K0.10MA0.90PbI3 at 300 K and 20 kHz
MAS (20 s recycle delay, 12 h total acquisition time).
(a) Low-temperature (100
K) 13C CP MAS spectra, (b)
echo-detected 14N MAS spectra at 300 K and 5 kHz MAS of
MAPbI3 (top) and K0.10MA0.90PbI3 (bottom), and (c) echo-detected 39K spectrum of
K0.10MA0.90PbI3 at 300 K and 20 kHz
MAS (20 s recycle delay, 12 h total acquisition time).The hypothesis that rubidium-rich phases may act
as a passivation
layer is supported by a recent XPS study which has found unexpectedly
high (with respect to a theoretical homogeneous distribution) concentration
of Cs and Rb in the 18 nm surface layer of a RbCsMAFA(Br,I) thin film.[47] Taken with the NMR result suggesting the formation
of δ-Cs0.5Rb0.5PbI3, it indicates
that the mixed rubidium/cesium hexagonal phase has a propensity to
form at the top of the perovskite film during solution processing,
thereby isolating it from ambient humidity.In summary, Table rounds up the capacity
for incorporation of Cs+ and Rb+ into perovskite
lattices found here.
Table 1
Incorporation Capacity
of Cs+ and Rb+ into FAPbI3-Based
Perovskite Lattices
Potassium has an atomic radius similar to that of rubidium, and
its incorporation has recently attracted attention as a means of improving
PV performance of perovskite materials.[15,48] Here we investigate
the simplest case of K0.10MA0.90PbI3. Figure a,b shows
a comparison between 13C and 14N spectra of
MAPbI3 and K0.10MA0.90PbI3. The spectra are, to within error, identical and indicate that no
potassium incorporation into the MAPbI3 lattice takes place.
Further, the 39K spectrum of K0.10MA0.90PbI3 acquired over 12 h shows only the presence of unreacted
potassium iodide used as a precursor. Given the similarity of the
atomic radii of Rb and K, and in light of the above discussion, it
is not surprising that no potassium incorporation takes place.
Bulk Microstructure
Matches That of Thin Films
The
bulk perovskites synthesized by means of mechanochemistry studied
here are also potentially a convenient source of material for scaling
up the production of PV perovskites.[27,29] However, so
far it has been unclear whether their microscopic structure corresponds
to that of thin films prepared by solution processing. In order to
address this, we prepared a mechanochemical bulk sample of CsMAFA(Br,I)
and compared it with a spin-coated CsMAFA(Br,I) thin film.[16]Figure shows solid-state 133Cs, 13C
CP and 14N MAS NMR spectra of the two samples. The low-temperature 133Cs spectra are essentially identical and contain one broad
peak corresponding to Cs+ incorporated into the perovskite
lattice, analogous to the one observed for Cs0.20FA0.80 (Figure a, 103 K). The experiment was carried out at 100 K to take advantage
of the shorter recycle delay and improve the overall sensitivity.
The low-temperature 13C CP spectra (Figure b) indicate that only the black phase of
FA is present in both cases.[26] The two
spectra have no significant differences, and their appearance corresponds
to that of the MAFA system, given for reference at the top of Figure b.
Figure 7
Solid-state MAS NMR spectra
of CsMAFA(Br,I) in bulk (blue) and
prepared as thin film on glass (red). (a) Echo-detected 133Cs spectra at 100 K and 12 kHz MAS (Figure f is the corresponding 298 K spectrum of
the bulk material), (b) 13C CP at 100 K and 12 kHz MAS,
and (c) 14N echo-detected spectra at 298 K and 20 kHz MAS
(acquisition times: bulk 20 h, thin film 60 h). The isotropic signal
marked “†” most likely comes from traces of DMF
used during spin-coating.
Solid-state MAS NMR spectra
of CsMAFA(Br,I) in bulk (blue) and
prepared as thin film on glass (red). (a) Echo-detected 133Cs spectra at 100 K and 12 kHz MAS (Figure f is the corresponding 298 K spectrum of
the bulk material), (b) 13C CP at 100 K and 12 kHz MAS,
and (c) 14N echo-detected spectra at 298 K and 20 kHz MAS
(acquisition times: bulk 20 h, thin film 60 h). The isotropic signal
marked “†” most likely comes from traces of DMF
used during spin-coating.We have previously shown that 14N MAS spectra
of mixed-cation
phases are a sensitive probe of the cation reorientation dynamics
which is encoded in the spectral envelope and line widths.[26] Here, the two 14N spectra (Figure c) again have very
similar envelopes and line widths. However, the observed line widths
are in this case determined by inhomogeneous effects (disorder), as
evidenced by the fact that they are not Lorentzian in shape and do
not change with increasing the temperature, thus preventing us from
extracting quantitative information on cation reorientation. On the
other hand, the similarity of the two spectral envelopes indicates
that the two cations in both cases reorient in a potential of similar
symmetry, pointing to a similar extent of lattice distortion in the
two materials.
Conclusions
In summary, we have
shown that 133Cs and 87Rb solid-state NMR offers
a robust way of identifying cesium and
rubidium species in multication perovskite materials relevant to photovoltaics.In particular, we have found that cesium is readily incorporated
into the perovskite lattice of FA-based materials up to around 15
mol %. Above 15 mol %, a second δ-CsPbI3 phase is
observed. Rubidium, on the other hand, does not form a solid alloy
with FA in any of the studied compositions. Rather, it separates into
a mixture of rubidium-rich phases (RbPbI3 mixed cesium–rubidium
lead iodides, mixture of rubidium halides, various rubidium lead bromides,
depending on the exact composition). All of these rubidium-rich phases
potentially act as a passivation layer for the perovskite material.
We have also found that potassium, which has a size similar to rubidium,
is not incorporated into the MAPbI3 lattice.Further,
we have shown that the microscopic composition, as probed
by 1D 133Cs, 13C, and 14N MAS NMR,
of a bulk mechanochemical perovskite preparation, here CsMAFA(Br,I),
is indistinguishable from that of a thin film prepared using the two-step
solution process.
Authors: Nam Joong Jeon; Jun Hong Noh; Woon Seok Yang; Young Chan Kim; Seungchan Ryu; Jangwon Seo; Sang Il Seok Journal: Nature Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Dominik J Kubicki; Daniel Prochowicz; Albert Hofstetter; Péter Péchy; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Michael Grätzel; Lyndon Emsley Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Michael Saliba; Taisuke Matsui; Ji-Youn Seo; Konrad Domanski; Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena; Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Wolfgang Tress; Antonio Abate; Anders Hagfeldt; Michael Grätzel Journal: Energy Environ Sci Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 38.532
Authors: Mojtaba Abdi-Jalebi; Zahra Andaji-Garmaroudi; Stefania Cacovich; Camille Stavrakas; Bertrand Philippe; Johannes M Richter; Mejd Alsari; Edward P Booker; Eline M Hutter; Andrew J Pearson; Samuele Lilliu; Tom J Savenije; Håkan Rensmo; Giorgio Divitini; Caterina Ducati; Richard H Friend; Samuel D Stranks Journal: Nature Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Marcel Aebli; Laura Piveteau; Olga Nazarenko; Bogdan M Benin; Franziska Krieg; René Verel; Maksym V Kovalenko Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hong Zhang; Felix Thomas Eickemeyer; Zhiwen Zhou; Marko Mladenović; Farzaneh Jahanbakhshi; Lena Merten; Alexander Hinderhofer; Michael A Hope; Olivier Ouellette; Aditya Mishra; Paramvir Ahlawat; Dan Ren; Tzu-Sen Su; Anurag Krishna; Zaiwei Wang; Zhaowen Dong; Jinming Guo; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Frank Schreiber; Anders Hagfeldt; Lyndon Emsley; Ursula Rothlisberger; Jovana V Milić; Michael Grätzel Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Abhoy Karmakar; Amit Bhattacharya; Diganta Sarkar; Guy M Bernard; Arthur Mar; Vladimir K Michaelis Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 9.825