Literature DB >> 30842698

Establishing Bayley-III cut-off scores at 21 months for predicting low IQ scores at 3 years of age in a preterm cohort.

Dianne E Creighton1,2, Selphee Tang2, Jill Newman2, Leonora Hendson1,2, Reg Sauve3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictive validity and establish cut-off scores on the Bayley-III at age 21 months that best predict Intelligence Quotient (IQ) scores <70 or <80) at 3 years in a high-risk preterm cohort.
METHOD: Bayley-III evaluations at 21 months corrected age and intellectual assessments, primarily with the WPPSI-III, at 3 years corrected age were conducted with 520 infants born less than 29 weeks gestational age or less than 1250 g birth weight. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to establish Bayley-III Cognitive Composite cut-off scores that maximized Sensitivity and Specificity in predicting low IQ. Similar analyses were performed using the Language Composite, and a research derived mean Cognitive-Language Composite.
RESULTS: A regression model for the association between 21-month Bayley-III Cognitive Composite and 3-year IQ scores was significant (P<0.0001, Adjusted R2=0.36). The ROC area under the Curve was 0.90 for the Cognitive Composite predicting IQ<70. The cut-off score that maximized Sensitivity and Specificity for predicting 3-year IQ<70 was a Cognitive Composite of <80. The ROC Area under the Curve was 0.80 for Cognitive Composites predicting IQ<80 and a Cognitive Composite cut-off score of <90 maximized Sensitivity and Specificity.
CONCLUSION: In this high-risk preterm cohort, there was a strong association between the Bayley-III Cognitive Composite at 21 months and IQ at 3 years. A Cognitive Composite cut-off score of <80 optimized classification of IQ<70 at 3 years, and a Cognitive Composite cut-off score of <90 optimized classification of IQ<80.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayley-III; Development; Preterm infants

Year:  2018        PMID: 30842698      PMCID: PMC6242003          DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxy038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1205-7088            Impact factor:   2.253


  12 in total

1.  A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants.

Authors:  Yen-Ting Yu; Wu-Shiun Hsieh; Chyong-Hsin Hsu; Li-Chiou Chen; Wang-Tso Lee; Nan-Chang Chiu; Ying-Chin Wu; Suh-Fang Jeng
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-09-09

2.  Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes.

Authors:  Betty R Vohr; Bonnie E Stephens; Rosemary D Higgins; Carla M Bann; Susan R Hintz; Abhik Das; Jamie E Newman; Myriam Peralta-Carcelen; Kimberly Yolton; Anna M Dusick; Patricia W Evans; Ricki F Goldstein; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Athina Pappas; Ira Adams-Chapman; Deanne E Wilson-Costello; Charles R Bauer; Anna Bodnar; Roy J Heyne; Yvonne E Vaucher; Robert G Dillard; Michael J Acarregui; Elisabeth C McGowan; Gary J Myers; Janell Fuller
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Bryan V Acton; Wayne S G Biggs; Dianne E Creighton; Karen A H Penner; Heather N Switzer; Julianne H Petrie Thomas; Ari R Joffe; Charlene M T Robertson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  A comparison of the performance of healthy Australian 3-year-olds with the standardised norms of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III).

Authors:  Shriniwas Chinta; Karen Walker; Robert Halliday; Alison Loughran-Fowlds; Nadia Badawi
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale.

Authors:  Peter J Anderson; Cinzia R De Luca; Esther Hutchinson; Gehan Roberts; Lex W Doyle
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2010-04

6.  Comparison of the Bayley II Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley III Cognitive Scale: are we measuring the same thing?

Authors:  Jean R Lowe; Sarah J Erickson; Ron Schrader; Andrea F Duncan
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.299

7.  Validity of US norms for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III in Malawian children.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Cromwell; Queen Dube; Stephen R Cole; Chawanangwa Chirambo; Anna E Dow; Robert S Heyderman; Annelies Van Rie
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.140

8.  Relationship between test scores using the second and third editions of the Bayley Scales in extremely preterm children.

Authors:  Tamanna Moore; Samantha Johnson; Sadia Haider; Enid Hennessy; Neil Marlow
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Using the Bayley-III to assess neurodevelopmental delay: which cut-off should be used?

Authors:  Samantha Johnson; Tamanna Moore; Neil Marlow
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.756

10.  Comparison of Bayley-2 and Bayley-3 scores at 18 months in term infants following neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia.

Authors:  Sally Jary; Andrew Whitelaw; Lars Walløe; Marianne Thoresen
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 5.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.