AIM: To better understand differences between Bayley Scales 3rd edition (Bayley III) Cognitive Scale and Bayley Scales 2nd edition (Bayley II) Mental Developmental Index (MDI) in 18-22-month-old children born term and preterm and to create a conversion algorithm using Bayley II MDI to calculate Bayley III Cognitive score. METHODS: This study included 51 term and 26 preterm children between 18 and 22 months, ages adjusted for prematurity. Children's scores on Bayley II MDI and Bayley III Cognitive Scale were compared using t-tests. The items from Bayley II MDI were used to calculate a score for the Bayley III Cognitive Scale. ANCOVA was used to create a conversion scale. RESULTS: Bayley III Cognitive scores were significantly higher than Bayley II MDI scores for term and preterm toddlers combined and separately (p < .0001). A conversion formula to convert Bayley II MDI to a Bayley III Cognitive score was calculated. CONCLUSION: Term and preterm children had similarly elevated scores on the Bayley III calculated Cognitive score compared to the previous Bayley II MDI score. The use of a conversion algorithm may be helpful in studies that used both Bayley editions to get comparable outcome measurements within a clinical or research paradigm.
AIM: To better understand differences between Bayley Scales 3rd edition (Bayley III) Cognitive Scale and Bayley Scales 2nd edition (Bayley II) Mental Developmental Index (MDI) in 18-22-month-old children born term and preterm and to create a conversion algorithm using Bayley II MDI to calculate Bayley III Cognitive score. METHODS: This study included 51 term and 26 preterm children between 18 and 22 months, ages adjusted for prematurity. Children's scores on Bayley II MDI and Bayley III Cognitive Scale were compared using t-tests. The items from Bayley II MDI were used to calculate a score for the Bayley III Cognitive Scale. ANCOVA was used to create a conversion scale. RESULTS: Bayley III Cognitive scores were significantly higher than Bayley II MDI scores for term and preterm toddlers combined and separately (p < .0001). A conversion formula to convert Bayley II MDI to a Bayley III Cognitive score was calculated. CONCLUSION: Term and preterm children had similarly elevated scores on the Bayley III calculated Cognitive score compared to the previous Bayley II MDI score. The use of a conversion algorithm may be helpful in studies that used both Bayley editions to get comparable outcome measurements within a clinical or research paradigm.
Authors: Bryan V Acton; Wayne S G Biggs; Dianne E Creighton; Karen A H Penner; Heather N Switzer; Julianne H Petrie Thomas; Ari R Joffe; Charlene M T Robertson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Barbara J Stoll; Nellie I Hansen; Edward F Bell; Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; Michele C Walsh; Ellen C Hale; Nancy S Newman; Kurt Schibler; Waldemar A Carlo; Kathleen A Kennedy; Brenda B Poindexter; Neil N Finer; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Shahnaz Duara; Pablo J Sánchez; T Michael O'Shea; Ronald N Goldberg; Krisa P Van Meurs; Roger G Faix; Dale L Phelps; Ivan D Frantz; Kristi L Watterberg; Shampa Saha; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-08-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Daniel S Messinger; Charles R Bauer; Abhik Das; Ron Seifer; Barry M Lester; Linda L Lagasse; Linda L Wright; Seetha Shankaran; Henrietta S Bada; Vincent L Smeriglio; John C Langer; Marjorie Beeghly; W Kenneth Poole Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Betty R Vohr; Linda L Wright; Anna M Dusick; Rebecca Perritt; W Kenneth Poole; Jon E Tyson; Jean J Steichen; Charles R Bauer; Deanne E Wilson-Costello; Linda C Mayes Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sarika U Peters; Jan Goddard-Finegold; Arthur L Beaudet; Niru Madduri; Marie Turcich; Carlos A Bacino Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Mary T Caserta; Caroline B Hall; Richard L Canfield; Philip Davidson; Gerry Lofthus; Kenneth Schnabel; Jennifer Carnahan; Lynne Shelley; Hongyue Wang Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: June Cho; Diane Holditch-Davis; Xiaogang Su; Vivien Phillips; Fred Biasini; Waldemar A Carlo Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: J W Sheehan; M Pritchard; R J Heyne; L S Brown; M A Jaleel; W D Engle; P J Burchfield; L P Brion Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Amy R Nichols; Andrew G Rundle; Pam Factor-Litvak; Beverly J Insel; Lori Hoepner; Virginia Rauh; Frederica Perera; Elizabeth M Widen Journal: J Dev Orig Health Dis Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: Jessica B Girault; Benjamin W Langworthy; Barbara D Goldman; Rebecca L Stephens; Emil Cornea; J Steven Reznick; Jason Fine; John H Gilmore Journal: Intelligence Date: 2018-03-16
Authors: Sarah J Erickson; Susanne W Duvall; Janell Fuller; Ron Schrader; Peggy MacLean; Jean R Lowe Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Gretchen Bandoli; Claire D Coles; Julie A Kable; Wladimir Wertelecki; Irina V Granovska; Alla O Pashtepa; Christina D Chambers Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 3.455