OBJECTIVE: To define the relationship between current Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third edition (Bayley-III) scores and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition Mental Development Index (MDI) to aid the comparison of population outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: MDI and Bayley-III cognitive/language scales were administered concurrently in 185 extremely preterm children (≤26 weeks) at 29-41 months of age. Cognitive and language scores were combined (combined Bayley-III score [CB-III scores]) for comparison with MDI scores. RESULTS: Bayley-III cognitive and language scores were 10 and 3 points higher than MDI scores, respectively; CB-III scores were 7 points higher. The relationship between CB-III and MDI scores was not a simple offset: CB-III values were increasingly higher than MDI at lower scores. Bayley-III scores underidentified MDI scores <70 (sensitivity 58%; specificity 100%). An algorithm for converting Bayley-III scores into MDI scores improved predictive value (sensitivity 95%; specificity 97%). Bayley-III scores <80 were similarly predictive (sensitivity 89%; specificity 99%). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend caution in the interpretation of Bayley-III scores in population studies as the correlation with the previous edition appears worse at lower test score values and the predictive value for IQ is as yet unclear. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: To define the relationship between current Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third edition (Bayley-III) scores and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition Mental Development Index (MDI) to aid the comparison of population outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: MDI and Bayley-III cognitive/language scales were administered concurrently in 185 extremely preterm children (≤26 weeks) at 29-41 months of age. Cognitive and language scores were combined (combined Bayley-III score [CB-III scores]) for comparison with MDI scores. RESULTS: Bayley-III cognitive and language scores were 10 and 3 points higher than MDI scores, respectively; CB-III scores were 7 points higher. The relationship between CB-III and MDI scores was not a simple offset: CB-III values were increasingly higher than MDI at lower scores. Bayley-III scores underidentified MDI scores <70 (sensitivity 58%; specificity 100%). An algorithm for converting Bayley-III scores into MDI scores improved predictive value (sensitivity 95%; specificity 97%). Bayley-III scores <80 were similarly predictive (sensitivity 89%; specificity 99%). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend caution in the interpretation of Bayley-III scores in population studies as the correlation with the previous edition appears worse at lower test score values and the predictive value for IQ is as yet unclear. Copyright Â
Authors: Noelle Younge; Ricki F Goldstein; Carla M Bann; Susan R Hintz; Ravi M Patel; P Brian Smith; Edward F Bell; Matthew A Rysavy; Andrea F Duncan; Betty R Vohr; Abhik Das; Ronald N Goldberg; Rosemary D Higgins; C Michael Cotten Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Laurel A Slaughter; Eliana Bonfante-Mejia; Susan R Hintz; Igor Dvorchik; Nehal A Parikh Journal: Neonatology Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Betty R Vohr; Bonnie E Stephens; Rosemary D Higgins; Carla M Bann; Susan R Hintz; Abhik Das; Jamie E Newman; Myriam Peralta-Carcelen; Kimberly Yolton; Anna M Dusick; Patricia W Evans; Ricki F Goldstein; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Athina Pappas; Ira Adams-Chapman; Deanne E Wilson-Costello; Charles R Bauer; Anna Bodnar; Roy J Heyne; Yvonne E Vaucher; Robert G Dillard; Michael J Acarregui; Elisabeth C McGowan; Gary J Myers; Janell Fuller Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: J W Sheehan; M Pritchard; R J Heyne; L S Brown; M A Jaleel; W D Engle; P J Burchfield; L P Brion Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Vicky L Ng; Lisa G Sorensen; Estella M Alonso; Emily M Fredericks; Wen Ye; Jeff Moore; Saul J Karpen; Benjamin L Shneider; Jean P Molleston; Jorge A Bezerra; Karen F Murray; Kathleen M Loomes; Philip Rosenthal; Robert H Squires; Kasper Wang; Ronen Arnon; Kathleen B Schwarz; Yumirle P Turmelle; Barbara H Haber; Averell H Sherker; John C Magee; Ronald J Sokol Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Lian Liu; Xijin Xu; Taofeek Akangbe Yekeen; Kun Lin; Weiqiu Li; Xia Huo Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Deborah L Harris; Jane M Alsweiler; Judith M Ansell; Gregory D Gamble; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia A Wouldes; Tzu-Ying Yu; Jane E Harding Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 4.406