Literature DB >> 25910472

Clinical outcomes of zirconia-based implant- and tooth-supported single crowns.

Farahnaz Nejatidanesh1, Hedayat Moradpoor2, Omid Savabi3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Zirconia-based restorations have been increasingly used on implant and teeth abutments, but the evidence about clinical outcomes of these restorations is limited. The aim of this study was to assess up to 7-year clinical outcomes of implant- and tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 261 patients with 556 single crowns supported by either teeth (324) or implants (232) were examined during 3- to 7-year follow-up (mean observation of 60.70 months for tooth and 59.20 months for implant-supported crowns). California Dental Association (CDA) quality evaluation system was used to evaluate the restorations. Soft tissue status was assessed using plaque and gingival index scores, bleeding on probing, and pocket depth. Patient and professional satisfaction were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS).
RESULTS: The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival probability was 98.3 and 97.3 for implant- and tooth-supported crowns, respectively. In regard to CDA rating, most of the crowns were ranked as either excellent or acceptable (99.5 %). The recorded failures were replacement of the crown due to porcelain chipping (3), implant failure (1), and teeth extraction (5). Soft tissue parameters were not affected by the restorations compare to control teeth. The VAS was high for both patients and clinicians.
CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia-based single crowns on both tooth and implant abutments showed promising clinical performance in this up to 7-year follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The zirconia-based single crowns can be used clinically for tooth- and implant-supported restorations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided design; Crowns; Dental restoration failures; Survival analysis; Treatment outcome; Zirconium oxide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25910472     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1479-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  44 in total

1.  An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 1. Outcome.

Authors:  Terry R Walton
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 2.  Survival probability of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses up to 5 yr: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jaana-Sophia Schley; Nicole Heussen; Sven Reich; Jan Fischer; Klaus Haselhuhn; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.612

3.  All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study.

Authors:  P Vult von Steyern; P Carlson; K Nilner
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Claudia Holderegger; Irena Sailer; Ameen Khraisat; Ana Suter; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results.

Authors:  Joachim Tinschert; Karen A Schulze; Gerd Natt; Peter Latzke; Nicole Heussen; Hubertus Spiekermann
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.

Authors:  Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Omid Savabi; Ehsan Jabbari
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems.

Authors:  H Löe
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1967 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 8.  Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics.

Authors:  Petra Christine Guess; Wael Att; Joerg Rudolf Strub
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 9.  Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).

Authors:  Bjarni E Pjetursson; Urs Brägger; Niklaus P Lang; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 10.  Clinical outcome of single porcelain-fused-to-zirconium dioxide crowns: a systematic review.

Authors:  Takuro Takeichi; Joannis Katsoulis; Markus B Blatz
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  10 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of zirconia-based all-ceramic single crowns: an up to 12-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shoko Miura; Shin Kasahara; Shinobu Yamauchi; Yayoi Okuyama; Akio Izumida; Jun Aida; Hiroshi Egusa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Association of indirect restorations with past caries history and present need for restorative treatment in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966.

Authors:  Anne Laajala; Pasi Karhatsu; Paula Pesonen; Marja-Liisa Laitala; Ritva Näpänkangas; Aune Raustia; Vuokko Anttonen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The progressive wear and abrasiveness of novel graded glass/zirconia materials relative to their dental ceramic counterparts.

Authors:  Marina R Kaizer; Rafael R Moraes; Sergio S Cava; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Clinical acceptability of PEEK fixed dental prosthesis in partially edentulous patient - A one year single arm pilot study.

Authors:  D Arun Raj; Naveen Gopi Chander; Jetti Ramesh Reddy; Muthukumar Balasubramaniam
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-18

Review 5.  Influence of implant location on the clinical outcomes of implant abutments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amr G ElHoussiney; He Zhang; Jinlin Song; Ping Ji; Lu Wang; Sheng Yang
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-02-26

6.  Survival and Success Rates of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Supported by Teeth and Implants in Bruxer versus Non-Bruxer Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Hadas Heller; David Sreter; Adi Arieli; Ilan Beitlitum; Raphael Pilo; Shifra Levartovsky
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson; Irena Sailer; Andrey Latyshev; Kerstin Rabel; Ralf-Joachim Kohal; Duygu Karasan
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.021

8.  Fracture of Lithia Disilicate Ceramics under Different Environmental Conditions.

Authors:  Josephine F Esquivel-Upshaw; Shu-Min Hsu; Fan Ren; Jenna Stephany; Xinyi Xia; Chan-Wen Chiu; Dan Neal; John J Mecholsky
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.748

9.  In vitro performance and fracture resistance of novel CAD/CAM ceramic molar crowns loaded on implants and human teeth.

Authors:  Verena Preis; Sebastian Hahnel; Michael Behr; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Patient Satisfaction with Implant-Supported Monolithic and Partially Veneered Zirconia Restorations.

Authors:  Paolo De Angelis; Giulio Gasparini; Edoardo Rella; Silvio De Angelis; Cristina Grippaudo; Antonio D'Addona; Paolo Francesco Manicone
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.