Literature DB >> 30824234

Validity and reliability of peak tibial accelerations as real-time measure of impact loading during over-ground rearfoot running at different speeds.

Pieter Van den Berghe1, Joren Six2, Joeri Gerlo3, Marc Leman2, Dirk De Clercq3.   

Abstract

Studies seeking to determine the effects of gait retraining through biofeedback on peak tibial acceleration (PTA) assume that this biometric trait is a valid measure of impact loading that is reliable both within and between sessions. However, reliability and validity data were lacking for axial and resultant PTAs along the speed range of over-ground endurance running. A wearable system was developed to continuously measure 3D tibial acceleration and to detect PTAs in real-time. Thirteen rearfoot runners ran at 2.55, 3.20 and 5.10 m·s-1 over an instrumented runway in two sessions with re-attachment of the system. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine within-session reliability. Repeatability was evaluated by paired T-tests and ICCs. Concerning validity, axial and resultant PTAs were correlated to the peak vertical impact loading rate (LR) of the ground reaction force. Additionally, speed should affect impact loading magnitude. Hence, magnitudes were compared across speeds by RM-ANOVA. Within a session, ICCs were over 0.90 and reasonable for clinical measurements. Between sessions, the magnitudes remained statistically similar with ICCs ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 for axial PTA and from 0.53 to 0.81 for resultant PTA. Peak accelerations of the lower leg segment correlated to LR with larger coefficients for axial PTA (r range: 0.64-0.84) than for the resultant PTA per speed condition. The magnitude of each impact measure increased with speed. These data suggest that PTAs registered per stand-alone system can be useful during level, over-ground, rearfoot running to evaluate impact loading in the time domain when force platforms are unavailable in studies with repeated measurements.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Impact; Running biomechanics; Tibial shock; Validation; Wearable

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30824234     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

1.  Effects of Wearable Devices with Biofeedback on Biomechanical Performance of Running-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Giraldo-Pedroza; Winson Chiu-Chun Lee; Wing-Kai Lam; Robyn Coman; Gursel Alici
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Music-based biofeedback to reduce tibial shock in over-ground running: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Pieter Van den Berghe; Valerio Lorenzoni; Rud Derie; Joren Six; Joeri Gerlo; Marc Leman; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Principal Component Analysis of the Running Ground Reaction Forces With Different Speeds.

Authors:  Lin Yu; Qichang Mei; Liangliang Xiang; Wei Liu; Nur Ikhwan Mohamad; Bíró István; Justin Fernandez; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-25

4.  Implications of sample size and acquired number of steps to investigate running biomechanics.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Cristina Ioana Pirscoveanu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Reliability and Validity of Running Cadence and Stance Time Derived from Instrumented Wireless Earbuds.

Authors:  Anouk Nijs; Peter J Beek; Melvyn Roerdink
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Running Injury Paradigms and Their Influence on Footwear Design Features and Runner Assessment Methods: A Focused Review to Advance Evidence-Based Practice for Running Medicine Clinicians.

Authors:  Cristine Agresta; Christina Giacomazzi; Mark Harrast; Jessica Zendler
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-09

7.  Treadmill and Running Speed Effects on Acceleration Impacts: Curved Non-Motorized Treadmill vs. Conventional Motorized Treadmill.

Authors:  Alberto Encarnación-Martínez; Ignacio Catalá-Vilaplana; Rafael Berenguer-Vidal; Roberto Sanchis-Sanchis; Borja Ochoa-Puig; Pedro Pérez-Soriano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Validity and Reliability of an Instrumented Treadmill with an Accelerometry System for Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Parameters and Impact Transmission.

Authors:  Alberto Encarnación-Martínez; Pedro Pérez-Soriano; Roberto Sanchis-Sanchis; Antonio García-Gallart; Rafael Berenguer-Vidal
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Change-Point Detection of Peak Tibial Acceleration in Overground Running Retraining.

Authors:  Pieter Van den Berghe; Maxim Gosseries; Joeri Gerlo; Matthieu Lenoir; Marc Leman; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren C Benson; Anu M Räisänen; Christian A Clermont; Reed Ferber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.