| Literature DB >> 30817830 |
James S Wolffsohn1, Pete S Kollbaum2, David A Berntsen3, David A Atchison4, Alexandra Benavente5, Arthur Bradley2, Hetal Buckhurst6, Michael Collins4, Takashi Fujikado7, Takahiro Hiraoka8, Masakazu Hirota7, Debbie Jones9, Nicola S Logan1, Linda Lundström10, Hidemasa Torii11, Scott A Read4, Kovin Naidoo12.
Abstract
The evidence-basis based on existing myopia control trials along with the supporting academic literature were reviewed; this informed recommendations on the outcomes suggested from clinical trials aimed at slowing myopia progression to show the effectiveness of treatments and the impact on patients. These outcomes were classified as primary (refractive error and/or axial length), secondary (patient reported outcomes and treatment compliance), and exploratory (peripheral refraction, accommodative changes, ocular alignment, pupil size, outdoor activity/lighting levels, anterior and posterior segment imaging, and tissue biomechanics). The currently available instrumentation, which the literature has shown to best achieve the primary and secondary outcomes, was reviewed and critiqued. Issues relating to study design and patient selection were also identified. These findings and consensus from the International Myopia Institute members led to final recommendations to inform future instrumentation development and to guide clinical trial protocols.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30817830 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-25955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.799