Literature DB >> 30798116

Weakly supervised mitosis detection in breast histopathology images using concentric loss.

Chao Li1, Xinggang Wang2, Wenyu Liu3, Longin Jan Latecki4, Bo Wang5, Junzhou Huang6.   

Abstract

Developing new deep learning methods for medical image analysis is a prevalent research topic in machine learning. In this paper, we propose a deep learning scheme with a novel loss function for weakly supervised breast cancer diagnosis. According to the Nottingham Grading System, mitotic count plays an important role in breast cancer diagnosis and grading. To determine the cancer grade, pathologists usually need to manually count mitosis from a great deal of histopathology images, which is a very tedious and time-consuming task. This paper proposes an automatic method for detecting mitosis. We regard the mitosis detection task as a semantic segmentation problem and use a deep fully convolutional network to address it. Different from conventional training data used in semantic segmentation system, the training label of mitosis data is usually in the format of centroid pixel, rather than all the pixels belonging to a mitosis. The centroid label is a kind of weak label, which is much easier to annotate and can save the effort of pathologists a lot. However, technically this weak label is not sufficient for training a mitosis segmentation model. To tackle this problem, we expand the single-pixel label to a novel label with concentric circles, where the inside circle is a mitotic region and the ring around the inside circle is a "middle ground". During the training stage, we do not compute the loss of the ring region because it may have the presence of both mitotic and non-mitotic pixels. This new loss termed as "concentric loss" is able to make the semantic segmentation network be trained with the weakly annotated mitosis data. On the generated segmentation map from the segmentation model, we filter out low confidence and obtain mitotic cells. On the challenging ICPR 2014 MITOSIS dataset and AMIDA13 dataset, we achieve a 0.562 F-score and 0.673 F-score respectively, outperforming all previous approaches significantly. On the latest TUPAC16 dataset, we obtain a F-score of 0.669, which is also the state-of-the-art result. The excellent results quantitatively demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mitosis segmentation network with the concentric loss. All of our code has been made publicly available at https://github.com/ChaoLi977/SegMitos_mitosis_detection.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer grading; Fully convolutional network; Mitosis detection; Weakly supervised learning

Year:  2019        PMID: 30798116     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  11 in total

1.  Automatic kidney segmentation in ultrasound images using subsequent boundary distance regression and pixelwise classification networks.

Authors:  Shi Yin; Qinmu Peng; Hongming Li; Zhengqiang Zhang; Xinge You; Katherine Fischer; Susan L Furth; Gregory E Tasian; Yong Fan
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic.

Authors:  Jeroen van der Laak; Geert Litjens; Francesco Ciompi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Reviewing Machine Learning and Image Processing Based Decision-Making Systems for Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Hasnae Zerouaoui; Ali Idri
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  An interpretable classifier for high-resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localization.

Authors:  Yiqiu Shen; Nan Wu; Jason Phang; Jungkyu Park; Kangning Liu; Sudarshini Tyagi; Laura Heacock; S Gene Kim; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Artificial Intelligence-Based Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histopathology Images Using Faster R-CNN and Deep CNNs.

Authors:  Tahir Mahmood; Muhammad Arsalan; Muhammad Owais; Min Beom Lee; Kang Ryoung Park
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Computational pathology definitions, best practices, and recommendations for regulatory guidance: a white paper from the Digital Pathology Association.

Authors:  Esther Abels; Liron Pantanowitz; Famke Aeffner; Mark D Zarella; Jeroen van der Laak; Marilyn M Bui; Venkata Np Vemuri; Anil V Parwani; Jeff Gibbs; Emmanuel Agosto-Arroyo; Andrew H Beck; Cleopatra Kozlowski
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Medical image analysis based on deep learning approach.

Authors:  Muralikrishna Puttagunta; S Ravi
Journal:  Multimed Tools Appl       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  System for quantitative evaluation of DAB&H-stained breast cancer biopsy digital images (CHISEL).

Authors:  Lukasz Roszkowiak; Anna Korzynska; Krzysztof Siemion; Jakub Zak; Dorota Pijanowska; Ramon Bosch; Marylene Lejeune; Carlos Lopez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A Two-Phase Mitosis Detection Approach Based on U-Shaped Network.

Authors:  Wenjing Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Deep Learning Models for Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Classification in Whole Slide Images.

Authors:  Fahdi Kanavati; Shin Ichihara; Michael Rambeau; Osamu Iizuka; Koji Arihiro; Masayuki Tsuneki
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.