Xinbo Zhang1, Richard K Parrish2, David S Greenfield2, Brian A Francis3, Rohit Varma4, Joel S Schuman5, Ou Tan1, David Huang6. 1. Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. 2. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA. 3. Doheny Eye Center and David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA. 5. New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 6. Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. Electronic address: huangd@ohsu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate predictive factors associated with the rate of visual field (VF) loss in open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study. METHODS: Perimetric glaucoma patients of the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma study were selected for analysis if they had 9 completed visits. Confirmed rapid significant progression (CRSP) of VF was defined as a significant (P < 0.05) negative VF index (VFI) slope of -1%/year or a mean deviation slope of -0.5 dB/year, confirmed at 2 consecutive follow-up visits. Slow progression was defined as VFI slope greater than -0.5%/year or a mean deviation slope of -0.25 dB/year. Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) measured optic disc, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (NFL), and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thicknesses. Logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors for CRSP and slow progression. Linear regression was used to identify baseline predictors for the VFI and mean deviation slope. RESULTS: Eyes (n = 150) of 103 participants were included. Slow progression was observed in 80 eyes (53.3%) and CRSP in 23 eyes (15.3%). Larger NFL and GCC baseline focal loss volume (FLV), thinner central corneal thickness, and lower VFI were significant (P < 0.05) baseline predictors of more rapid progression on univariate analysis. The predictor with the highest odds ratio (OR) was NFL-FLV, which was also the most significant non-VF predictor in the multivariate analysis. Eyes with NFL-FLV >8.5% had an OR of 2.67 for CRSP and 0.42 for slow progression. Disc hemorrhage during the follow-up was also important, with an OR of 2.61 for CRSP and 0.23 for slow progression for each occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Focal loss measured by FD-OCT or VF along with CCT are strong baseline predictors for the rate of glaucoma progression.
PURPOSE: To investigate predictive factors associated with the rate of visual field (VF) loss in open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study. METHODS: Perimetric glaucomapatients of the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma study were selected for analysis if they had 9 completed visits. Confirmed rapid significant progression (CRSP) of VF was defined as a significant (P < 0.05) negative VF index (VFI) slope of -1%/year or a mean deviation slope of -0.5 dB/year, confirmed at 2 consecutive follow-up visits. Slow progression was defined as VFI slope greater than -0.5%/year or a mean deviation slope of -0.25 dB/year. Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) measured optic disc, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (NFL), and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thicknesses. Logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors for CRSP and slow progression. Linear regression was used to identify baseline predictors for the VFI and mean deviation slope. RESULTS: Eyes (n = 150) of 103 participants were included. Slow progression was observed in 80 eyes (53.3%) and CRSP in 23 eyes (15.3%). Larger NFL and GCC baseline focal loss volume (FLV), thinner central corneal thickness, and lower VFI were significant (P < 0.05) baseline predictors of more rapid progression on univariate analysis. The predictor with the highest odds ratio (OR) was NFL-FLV, which was also the most significant non-VF predictor in the multivariate analysis. Eyes with NFL-FLV >8.5% had an OR of 2.67 for CRSP and 0.42 for slow progression. Disc hemorrhage during the follow-up was also important, with an OR of 2.61 for CRSP and 0.23 for slow progression for each occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Focal loss measured by FD-OCT or VF along with CCT are strong baseline predictors for the rate of glaucoma progression.
Authors: Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Phuc V Le; Xinbo Zhang; Brian A Francis; Rohit Varma; David S Greenfield; Joel S Schuman; Nils Loewen; David Huang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: David C Musch; Brenda W Gillespie; Paul R Lichter; Leslie M Niziol; Nancy K Janz Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Marina Cc Sousa; Luis G Biteli; Syril Dorairaj; Jessica S Maslin; Mauro T Leite; Tiago S Prata Journal: J Curr Glaucoma Pract Date: 2016-02-02
Authors: Brian C Stagg; Joshua D Stein; Felipe A Medeiros; Barbara Wirostko; Alan Crandall; M Elizabeth Hartnett; Mollie Cummins; Alan Morris; Rachel Hess; Kensaku Kawamoto Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2020-08-15
Authors: Gala Beykin; Anthony M Norcia; Vivek J Srinivasan; Alfredo Dubra; Jeffrey L Goldberg Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Ou Tan; Liang Liu; Qisheng You; Jie Wang; Aiyin Chen; Eliesa Ing; John C Morrison; Yali Jia; David Huang Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 3.283