PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, optic disc size, and image magnification. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 196 normal eyes of 101 participants in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study (AIGS), a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study to develop advanced imaging technologies for glaucoma diagnosis. Scanning laser tomography was used to measure disc size. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to perform circumpapillary RNFL thickness measurements using the standard fixed 3.46-mm nominal scan diameter. A theoretical model of magnification effects was developed to relate RNFL thickness (overall average) with axial length and magnification. RESULTS: Multivariate regression showed no significant correlation between RNFL thickness and optic disc area (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.9 to 4.1 μm/mm², P = 0.21). Linear regression showed that RNFL thickness depended significantly on axial length (slope = -3.1 μm/mm, 95% CI = -4.9 to -1.3, P = 0.001) and age (slope = -0.3 μm/y, 95% CI = -0.5 to -0.2, P = 0.0002). The slope values agreed closely with the values predicted by the magnification model. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant association between RNFL thickness and optic disc area. Previous publications that showed such an association may have been biased by the effect of axial length on fundus image magnification and, therefore, both measured RNFL thickness and apparent disc area. The true diameter of the circumpapillary OCT scan is larger for a longer eye (more myopic eye), leading to a thinner RNFL measurement. Adjustment of measured RNFL thickness by axial length, in addition to age, may lead to a tighter normative range and improve the detection of RNFL thinning due to glaucoma.
PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, optic disc size, and image magnification. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 196 normal eyes of 101 participants in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study (AIGS), a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study to develop advanced imaging technologies for glaucoma diagnosis. Scanning laser tomography was used to measure disc size. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to perform circumpapillary RNFL thickness measurements using the standard fixed 3.46-mm nominal scan diameter. A theoretical model of magnification effects was developed to relate RNFL thickness (overall average) with axial length and magnification. RESULTS: Multivariate regression showed no significant correlation between RNFL thickness and optic disc area (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.9 to 4.1 μm/mm², P = 0.21). Linear regression showed that RNFL thickness depended significantly on axial length (slope = -3.1 μm/mm, 95% CI = -4.9 to -1.3, P = 0.001) and age (slope = -0.3 μm/y, 95% CI = -0.5 to -0.2, P = 0.0002). The slope values agreed closely with the values predicted by the magnification model. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant association between RNFL thickness and optic disc area. Previous publications that showed such an association may have been biased by the effect of axial length on fundus image magnification and, therefore, both measured RNFL thickness and apparent disc area. The true diameter of the circumpapillary OCT scan is larger for a longer eye (more myopic eye), leading to a thinner RNFL measurement. Adjustment of measured RNFL thickness by axial length, in addition to age, may lead to a tighter normative range and improve the detection of RNFL thinning due to glaucoma.
Authors: Lelia A Paunescu; Joel S Schuman; Lori Lyn Price; Paul C Stark; Siobahn Beaton; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; James G Fujimoto Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rajul S Parikh; Shefali R Parikh; G Chandra Sekhar; S Prabakaran; J Ganesh Babu; Ravi Thomas Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Grace M Richter; Xinbo Zhang; Ou Tan; Brian A Francis; Vikas Chopra; David S Greenfield; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; David Huang Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Yali Jia; Joseph M Simonett; Jie Wang; Xiaohui Hua; Liang Liu; Thomas S Hwang; David Huang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Xinbo Zhang; Richard K Parrish; David S Greenfield; Brian A Francis; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; Ou Tan; David Huang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Xinbo Zhang; Anna Dastiridou; Brian A Francis; Ou Tan; Rohit Varma; David S Greenfield; Joel S Schuman; Mitra Sehi; Vikas Chopra; David Huang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Thomas S Hwang; Simon S Gao; Liang Liu; Andreas K Lauer; Steven T Bailey; Christina J Flaxel; David J Wilson; David Huang; Yali Jia Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 7.389