Literature DB >> 22743319

Does optic nerve head size variation affect circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography?

David Huang1, Vikas Chopra, Ake Tzu-Hui Lu, Ou Tan, Brian Francis, Rohit Varma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, optic disc size, and image magnification.
METHODS: The cohort consisted of 196 normal eyes of 101 participants in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study (AIGS), a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study to develop advanced imaging technologies for glaucoma diagnosis. Scanning laser tomography was used to measure disc size. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to perform circumpapillary RNFL thickness measurements using the standard fixed 3.46-mm nominal scan diameter. A theoretical model of magnification effects was developed to relate RNFL thickness (overall average) with axial length and magnification.
RESULTS: Multivariate regression showed no significant correlation between RNFL thickness and optic disc area (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.9 to 4.1 μm/mm², P = 0.21). Linear regression showed that RNFL thickness depended significantly on axial length (slope = -3.1 μm/mm, 95% CI = -4.9 to -1.3, P = 0.001) and age (slope = -0.3 μm/y, 95% CI = -0.5 to -0.2, P = 0.0002). The slope values agreed closely with the values predicted by the magnification model.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant association between RNFL thickness and optic disc area. Previous publications that showed such an association may have been biased by the effect of axial length on fundus image magnification and, therefore, both measured RNFL thickness and apparent disc area. The true diameter of the circumpapillary OCT scan is larger for a longer eye (more myopic eye), leading to a thinner RNFL measurement. Adjustment of measured RNFL thickness by axial length, in addition to age, may lead to a tighter normative range and improve the detection of RNFL thinning due to glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22743319      PMCID: PMC4625828          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  53 in total

1.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  E Z Blumenthal; J M Williams; R N Weinreb; C A Girkin; C C Berry; L M Zangwill
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT.

Authors:  Lelia A Paunescu; Joel S Schuman; Lori Lyn Price; Paul C Stark; Siobahn Beaton; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Glaucomalike disks without increased intraocular pressure or visual field loss.

Authors:  G Tomita; T Takamoto; B Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Custom measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using STRATUS OCT in normal eyes.

Authors:  P Carpineto; M Ciancaglini; A Aharrh-Gnama; D Cirone; L Mastropasqua
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Variation of nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with age and ethnicity by scanning laser polarimetry.

Authors:  D Poinoosawmy; L Fontana; J X Wu; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Authors:  A Sommer; N R Miller; I Pollack; A E Maumenee; T George
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-12

7.  Normal age-related decay of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Authors:  Rajul S Parikh; Shefali R Parikh; G Chandra Sekhar; S Prabakaran; J Ganesh Babu; Ravi Thomas
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss.

Authors:  A Sommer; J Katz; H A Quigley; N R Miller; A L Robin; R C Richter; K A Witt
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01

9.  Myopia affects retinal nerve fiber layer measurements as determined by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Frederick M Rauscher; Navneet Sekhon; William J Feuer; Donald L Budenz
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage.

Authors:  H A Quigley; J Katz; R J Derick; D Gilbert; A Sommer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  29 in total

1.  Regression Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography Disc Variables for Glaucoma Diagnosis.

Authors:  Grace M Richter; Xinbo Zhang; Ou Tan; Brian A Francis; Vikas Chopra; David S Greenfield; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; David Huang
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Optic disc area in different types of glaucoma.

Authors:  Oya Tekeli; Esra Savku; Ahmed Abdullayev
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Influence of corneal power on circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head measurements by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Wide-Field OCT Angiography Investigation of the Relationship Between Radial Peripapillary Capillary Plexus Density and Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness.

Authors:  Yali Jia; Joseph M Simonett; Jie Wang; Xiaohui Hua; Liang Liu; Thomas S Hwang; David Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Predictive Factors for the Rate of Visual Field Progression in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study.

Authors:  Xinbo Zhang; Richard K Parrish; David S Greenfield; Brian A Francis; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; Ou Tan; David Huang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Baseline Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Structural Risk Factors for Visual Field Progression in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study.

Authors:  Xinbo Zhang; Anna Dastiridou; Brian A Francis; Ou Tan; Rohit Varma; David S Greenfield; Joel S Schuman; Mitra Sehi; Vikas Chopra; David Huang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Automated Quantification of Capillary Nonperfusion Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Thomas S Hwang; Simon S Gao; Liang Liu; Andreas K Lauer; Steven T Bailey; Christina J Flaxel; David J Wilson; David Huang; Yali Jia
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Structure-Function Relationships in Perimetric Glaucoma: Comparison of Minimum-Rim Width and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Parameters.

Authors:  Navid Amini; Ramin Daneshvar; Farideh Sharifipour; Pablo Romero; Sharon Henry; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Deep perifoveal vessel density as an indicator of capillary loss in high myopia.

Authors:  Dan Cheng; Qi Chen; Yufei Wu; Xueting Yu; Meixiao Shen; Xiran Zhuang; Zhongxu Tian; Ye Yang; Jianhua Wang; Fan Lu; Lijun Shen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Nerve Fiber Flux Analysis Using Wide-Field Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Ou Tan; Liang Liu; Li Liu; David Huang
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.