Literature DB >> 11294441

An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall.

D E Diller1, P A Nobel, R M Shiffrin.   

Abstract

This article presents a model for accuracy and response time (RT) in recognition and cued recall, fitted to free-response and signal-to-respond data from Experiment 1 of P. A. Nobel and R. M. Shiffrin (2001). The model posits that recognition operates through parallel activation in a single retrieval step and cued recall operates as a sequential search. Because the data for recognition showed that variations in list length and study time per list had a large effect on accuracy but a small or negligible effect on (a) free-response RT distributions and (b) retrieval dynamics in signal-to-respond, the timing of the recognition decision is based on an assessment of retrieval completion (ARC), rather than on a sufficiency of evidence in favor of 1 of the response options. By assuming within-trial forgetting, the model predicts both the dissociation of accuracy and RT and the finding that errors are slower than correct responses. For cued recall, this model was incorporated as the 1st step in a search consisting of cycles of sampling and recovery.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294441     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  16 in total

1.  Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

3.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on item recognition in young and older adults.

Authors:  Leah L Light; Christie Chung; Regina Pendergrass; Jeffrey C Van Ocker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

5.  On the flexibility and the fallibility of associative memory.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Jing Xu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

6.  The picture superiority effect in associative recognition.

Authors:  William E Hockley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

7.  Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes.

Authors:  William E Hockley; Marty W Niewiadomski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

8.  A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.

Authors:  Gregory J Koop; Amy H Criss; Angelina M Pardini
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

9.  Item repetition and retrieval processes in cued recall: Analysis of recall-latency distributions.

Authors:  Yoonhee Jang; Heungchul Lee
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

10.  Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.

Authors:  William J Hopper; David E Huber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.