Zhonghua Sun1, Emer Gallagher. 1. School of Applied Medical Sciences and Sports Studies, University of Ulster, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom. zh.sun@ulster.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the optimal scanning protocols of multislice computed tomographic (CT) angiography in aortic stent graft placement observed on virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A human aorta phantom was built with a commercial aortic stent graft placed in situ. The phantom was housed in a perspex container and filled with contrast medium with CT attenuation similar to that used in the patient's abdominal scanning. CT was performed with a four-slice multislice CT scanner with section thickness of 1.3 mm, 2 mm, and 3.2 mm, pitch of 0.75, 1, and 1.5, and reconstruction interval of 50% overlap and no overlap. Stair-step artifacts were quantified by measuring the SD of signal intensity on surfaced shaded VIE images in three different locations: superior mesenteric artery (SMA), renal ostium, and aortic aneurysm. RESULTS: Image quality of VIE images was independent of section thickness and pitch values in the level of renal ostium and aortic aneurysm (P >.05), whereas it was determined by the section thickness and pitch in the level of SMA (P <.05). Aortic branch origin became irregular or distorted when section thickness increased to 3.2 mm or pitch reached 1.5. CONCLUSION: A scanning protocol of section thickness of 2 mm, pitch 1, and reconstruction interval of 1 mm is recommended in aortic stent graft placement because it allows fewer stair-step artifacts and better visualization of the aortic stent wires observed on VIE.
PURPOSE: To investigate the optimal scanning protocols of multislice computed tomographic (CT) angiography in aortic stent graft placement observed on virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A human aorta phantom was built with a commercial aortic stent graft placed in situ. The phantom was housed in a perspex container and filled with contrast medium with CT attenuation similar to that used in the patient's abdominal scanning. CT was performed with a four-slice multislice CT scanner with section thickness of 1.3 mm, 2 mm, and 3.2 mm, pitch of 0.75, 1, and 1.5, and reconstruction interval of 50% overlap and no overlap. Stair-step artifacts were quantified by measuring the SD of signal intensity on surfaced shaded VIE images in three different locations: superior mesenteric artery (SMA), renal ostium, and aortic aneurysm. RESULTS: Image quality of VIE images was independent of section thickness and pitch values in the level of renal ostium and aortic aneurysm (P >.05), whereas it was determined by the section thickness and pitch in the level of SMA (P <.05). Aortic branch origin became irregular or distorted when section thickness increased to 3.2 mm or pitch reached 1.5. CONCLUSION: A scanning protocol of section thickness of 2 mm, pitch 1, and reconstruction interval of 1 mm is recommended in aortic stent graft placement because it allows fewer stair-step artifacts and better visualization of the aortic stent wires observed on VIE.