| Literature DB >> 30787322 |
Nirav Barapatre1, Eva Haeussner1, David Grynspan2, Christoph Schmitz1, Franz Edler von Koch3, Hans-Georg Frank4.
Abstract
Placental sexual dimorphism is of special interest in prenatal programming. Various postnatal diseases with gender dependent incidence, especially neuropsychiatric disorders like schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders, have prenatal risk factors established. However, the functional relevance of placental microarchitecture in prenatal programming is poorly investigated, mainly due to a lack of statistically efficient methods. We hypothesized that the recently established 3D microscopic analysis of villous trees would be able to identify microscopic structural correlates of human placental sexual dimorphism. We analyzed the density of cell nuclei of villous trophoblast, i.e. the materno-fetal exchange barrier, in placentas from term pregnancies. The cell nuclei were grouped into proliferative and non-proliferative nuclei by detection of a proliferation marker (PCNA). Normal female placentas showed a higher density of non-proliferating nuclei (PCNA-negative) in villous trophoblast than normal male placentas. The density of PCNA-negative cell nuclei was higher in placentas of pregnancies with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) than in control placentas. The data of the present study shows that the density of non-proliferative cell nuclei in the syncytial layer of villous trophoblast is influenced by fetal sex and by IUGR, while proliferation remains unchanged. A novel concept of post-fusion regulation of syncytial structure and function is proposed.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30787322 PMCID: PMC6382753 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38739-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Descriptive Statistics of Macroscopic Parameters.
| Descriptive Statistics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Group | Clinically normal | IUGR | Sex |
| Mean ± SD (n) | Mean ± SD (n) | Mean ± SD (n) | ||
| GA (week) | ♀ | 39.3 ± 1.0 (23) | 37.8 ± 2.6 (22) | |
| ♂ | 39.2 ± 0.7 (19) | 37.2 ± 2.9 (18) | ||
| BW (g) | ♀ | 3361 ± 576 (23) | 2314 ± 461 (22) | 2849 ± |
| ♂ | 3571 ± 453 (19) | 2223 ± 551 (18) | 2915 ± 833 (37) | |
| 3456 ± | 2273 ± | |||
| PW (g) | ♀ | 521 ± 124 (23) | 341 ± 53 (22) | 433 ± |
| ♂ | 528 ± 106 (19) | 362 ± 114 (18) | 447 ± | |
| 524 ± | 350 ± | |||
| PW/BW | ♀ | 0.153 ± 0.025 | 0.155 ± 0.042 | |
| ♂ | 0.147 ± 0.019 | 0.167 ± 0.057 | ||
| SA (cm²) | ♀ | 1149 ± 236 (23) | 923 ± 211 (22) | 1039 ± |
| ♂ | 1143 ± 244 (19) | 906 ± 287 (18) | 1028 ± | |
| 1147 ± | 916 ± | |||
| ROUND | ♀ | 1.18 ± 0.16 (23) | 1.20 ± 0.12 (22) | |
| ♂ | 1.21 ± 0.14 (19) | 1.22 ± 0.18 (18) | ||
| THICK (cm) | ♀ | 1.7 ± 0.4 (23) | 1.5 ± 0.3 (22) | |
| ♂ | 1.8 ± 0.4 (19) | 1.5 ± 0.4 (18) | ||
| LD (cm) | ♀ | 20.7 ± 2.9 (23) | 18.7 ± 2.6 (22) | |
| ♂ | 20.8 ± 2.9 (19) | 18.4 ± 2.6 (18) | ||
| SD (cm) | ♀ | 17.6 ± 1.9 (23) | 15.6 ± 1.8 (22) | |
| ♂ | 17.3 ± 1.7 (19) | 15.4 ± 3.0 (18) | ||
The table shows mean values (Mean), standard deviations (SD) and case numbers (n) of gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW) and the gross placental parameters placental weight (PW), ratio of PW to BW (PW/BW), surface area of the placental disc (SA), roundness of the placental disc (ROUND), thickness of the placental disc (THICK), longest diameter of the placental disc (LD), and shortest diameter of the placental disc (SD). PW/BW and Roundness are dimensionless factors; units of the other parameters are shown in brackets. The data are grouped into clinically normal placentas and placentas from pregnancies with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), and by gender (female ♀, male ♂). Aggregated data are in italics in the column Sex (aggregated by fetal gender) and the rows Group (aggregated by group).
Figure 1The density of cell nuclei of villous trophoblasts is graphed as Nearest Neighbor Distance (NND, A,B) and Mean Density (MD, C,D). The gross morphological parameters birth weight and placenta weight are shown in (E,F). The data are depicted by means of Tukey plots (A,C,E) and confidence intervals (B,D,F). The Tukey plots are grouped by clinical diagnosis groups (Control, IUGR), where Control represents clinically normal placentas. Males are represented by grey boxes. The sample mean is represented by a solid dot within the box. Levels of statistical significance are indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) above the Tukey plots for sexual dimorphism and below the Tukey plots for comparison of clinical groups. (A) The figure depicts the NND of PCNA-negative (PCNA-neg) cell nuclei of villous trophoblast of terminal (bT0) and preterminal (bT1) branches of the villous tree (B). Confidence intervals (95%) are shown for the difference (male-female) in means of the logarithmic data (C). The figure depicts MD (MD as number of cell nuclei by surface area and branch) of cell nuclei of villous trophoblast of terminal (bT0) and preterminal (bT1) branches of the villous trees (D). Confidence intervals (95%) are shown for the difference (male-female) in means. (E) The figure depicts the birth weights and placenta weights of the present study (F). Confidence intervals (95%) are shown for the difference (male-female) in means.
Statistical Testing (two-way ANOVA): The table shows the outcome of statistical testing (two-way ANOVA) for gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW) and the gross placental parameters placental weight (PW), ratio of PW to BW (PW/BW), surface area of the placental disc (SA), roundness of the placental disc (ROUND), thickness of the placental disc (THICK), longest diameter of the placental disc (LD), and shortest diameter of the placental disc (SD).
| Testing | Clinically normal | IUGR | Female (♀) | Male (♂) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | ♀/♂ | ♀/♂ | clinically normal/ IUGR | clinically normal/ IUGR |
| Parameters | ||||
| GA (week) | ns | ns | ns | p < 0.05 |
| BW (g) | ns | ns | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
| PW (g) | ns | ns | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
| PW/BW | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| SA (cm2) | ns | ns | p < 0.05 | p < 0.05 |
| ROUND | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| THICK (cm) | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| LD (cm) | ns | ns | ns | p < 0.05 |
| SD (cm) | ns | ns | p < 0.05 | p < 0.05 |
PW/BW and Roundness are dimensionless factors; units of the other parameters are shown in parentheses. Statistically significant outcome is indicated by p-values. Lack of statistical significance is indicated as not significant (ns). The first row groups the outcome by clinical groups (clinically normal, with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR)) and then by gender (female (♀); male (♂)). The second row indicates for each column which variables were compared (comparison indicated by slash (/)).
Descriptive Statistics. The table shows data of two different measures of spatial arrangement of nuclei of villous trophoblast, namely Mean Density of villous trophoblast nuclei (calculated by division of the total number of nuclei per branch through the surface area of the same branch) and Mean Nearest Neighbor Distance of villous trophoblast nuclei (determined for each individual nucleus).
| TOPO | PCNA | Group | Clinically normal | IUGR | Sex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bT0/ bT1 | Reactivity | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
|
| |||||
| bT0 | PCNA-neg. | ♀ | 10.57 ± 2.37 | 13.78 ± 4.40 | |
| PCNA-neg. | ♂ | 8.65 ± 2.06 | 13.77 ± 2.94 | ||
| bT1 | PCNA-neg. | ♀ | 9.19 ± 1.86 | 12.21 ± 3.84 | |
| PCNA-neg. | ♂ | 7.68 ± 1.92 | 12.27 ± 2.49 | ||
| bT0 | PCNA-pos. | ♀ | 0.85 ± 0.66 | 1.43 ± 2.64 | |
| PCNA-pos. | ♂ | 1.21 ± 0.93 | 0.71 ± 0.64 | ||
| bT1 | PCNA-pos. | ♀ | 0.64 ± 0.47 | 0.68 ± 0.77 | |
| PCNA-pos. | ♂ | 0.82 ± 0.54 | 0.65 ± 0.56 | ||
| 0.72 ± 0.50 | 0.67 ± 0.67 | ||||
|
| |||||
| bT0 | PCNA-neg. | ♀ | 4.06 ± 1.43 | 3.88 ± 1.44 | |
| PCNA-neg. | ♂ | 4.37 ± 1.36 | 3.87 ± 1.43 | ||
| bT1 | PCNA-neg. | ♀ | 4.10 ± 1.43 | 3.92 ± 1.45 | |
| PCNA-neg. | ♂ | 4.46 ± 1.46 | 3.99 ± 1.43 | ||
| bT0 | PCNA-pos. | ♀ | 8.56 ± 2.02 | 9.12 ± 2.17 | |
| PCNA-pos. | ♂ | 7.81 ± 1.97 | 9.37 ± 2.02 | ||
| bT1 | PCNA-pos. | ♀ | 8.26 ± 1.96 | 9.95 ± 2.26 | |
| PCNA-pos. | ♂ | 7.93 ± 1.88 | 9.64 ± 1.98 | ||
The data are stratified by topological position of branches of the villous trees (TOPO, with terminal (bT0) and preterminal (bT1) position of the respective branch(es)) and by reactivity of the nuclei for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, reactivity indicated by PCNA-positive (PCNA-pos) or PCNA-negative (PCNA-neg)). The data are shown as mean and standard deviation (SD) grouped by columns into clinically normal placentas and placentas from pregnancies with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), and by gender (female ♀, male ♂). Aggregated data are in italics in the column Sex (aggregated by fetal gender) and the rows Group (aggregated by group).
Statistical Testing (two-way ANOVA). The table shows the outcome of statistical testing (two-way ANOVA) for the parameters listed in Table 3, namely Mean Density of villous trophoblast nuclei (calculated by division of the total number of nuclei per branch through the surface area of the same branch) and Mean Nearest Neighbor Distance of villous trophoblast nuclei (determined for each individual nucleus).
| TOPO | PCNA | Clinically normal | IUGR | Female (♀) | Male (♂) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bT0/bT1 | reactivity | ♀/♂ | ♀/♂ | clinically normal/IUGR | clinically normal/IUGR |
|
| |||||
| bT0 | PCNA-neg. | p < 0.05 | ns | p < 0.01 | p < 0.001 |
| bT1 | PCNA-neg. | p < 0.05 | ns | p < 0.01 | p < 0.001 |
| bT0 | PCNA-pos. | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| bT1 | PCNA-pos. | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| |||||
| bT0 | PCNA-neg. | p < 0.001 | ns | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
| bT1 | PCNA-neg. | p < 0.001 | ns | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
| bT0 | PCNA-pos. | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| bT1 | PCNA-pos. | ns | ns | p < 0.05 | p < 0.05 |
The data are stratified in the first two columns by topological position of branches of the villous trees (TOPO, with terminal (bT0) and preterminal (bT1) position of the respective branch(es)) and by reactivity of the nuclei for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, reactivity indicated by PCNA-positive (PCNA-pos) or PCNA-negative (PCNA-neg)). The outcome is also stratified by clinical groups (clinically normal, with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR)) and then by gender (female ♀, male ♂). The second row indicates for each column of outcomes which variables were compared (comparison indicated by slash (/)). Statistically significant outcome is indicated by p-values. Lack of statistical significance is indicated as not significant (ns).
The table shows the estimates of effect size (Cohen’s d), the sample size and the observed statistical power for the parameters birth weight (BW), placenta weight (PW), mean surface density of PCNA-negative trophoblast nuclei (MD) and nearest neighbor distance of PCNA-negative nuclei (NND).
| Parameters | Cohens | Sample Size | Power | ♀/♂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | 0.4 | 42 | 0.24 | ns |
| PW (g) | 0.1 | 42 | 0.06 | ns |
| MD | 0.8 | 42 | 0.77 | p < 0.05 |
| NND | 0.2 | 12024 |
| p < 0.001 |
Only the data of the control group were considered for calculating these estimates. The last column indicates whether a significant difference was observed between male and female.
Figure 2The figure illustrates the principal idea of the concept of post-fusion control of syncytial structure and function proposed in the present study. The left side starts with input of cellular elements (blue dots symbolize nuclei, but all organelles are imported likewise) by cyto-syncytial fusion based on constant proliferation. The right side illustrates output of aged nuclei and organelles by shedding into the maternal circulation. The three pale blue rectangles symbolize syncytiotrophoblast and the effect of rate of progression (symbolized by red angles; number and color intensity symbolize the rate of progression) through the intrasyncytial phase on the density of organelles (nuclei shown are exemplary of all intrasyncytial organelles). The size of nuclei inside syncytiotrophoblast symbolizes ageing with smaller dots for more senescent nuclei. The proposed concept develops on actual concepts[37,38] on turnover and steady state of human villous trophoblast. It adds the aspect of time spent on passage of cytotrophoblast material (here: nuclei) through the syncytium and thereby interprets apparent changes of nuclear density as a consequence of variability of passage time (kinetic determination of apparent features of steady state).