| Literature DB >> 29335435 |
Marius Lahti-Pulkkinen1,2,3, Melissa Jane Cudmore4, Eva Haeussner5, Christoph Schmitz5, Anu-Katriina Pesonen6, Esa Hämäläinen7, Pia M Villa8, Susanna Mehtälä9, Eero Kajantie10,11,12, Hannele Laivuori9,13,14,15, Rebecca M Reynolds4, Hans-Georg Frank5, Katri Räikkönen6.
Abstract
Maternal depressive symptoms during pregnancy predict increased psychiatric problems in children. The underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear. Hence, we examined whether alterations in the morphology of 88 term placentas were associated with maternal depressive symptoms during pregnancy and psychiatric problems in 1.9-3.1-years old (Mean = 2.1 years) toddlers. Maternal depressive symptoms were rated biweekly during pregnancy with the Center of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (n = 86). Toddler psychiatric problems were mother-rated with the Child Behavior Checklist (n = 60). We found that higher maternal depressive symptoms throughout pregnancy [B = -0.24 Standard Deviation (SD) units: 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = -0.46; -0.03: P = 0.03; Mean difference = -0.66 SDs; 95% CI = -0.08; -1.23: P = 0.03; between those with and without clinically relevant depressive symptoms] were associated with lower variability in the placental villous barrier thickness of γ-smooth muscle actin-negative villi. This placental morphological change predicted higher total (B = -0.34 SDs: 95% CI = -0.60; -0.07: P = 0.01) and internalizing (B = -0.32 SDs: 95% CI = -0.56; -0.08: P = 0.01) psychiatric problems in toddlers. To conclude, our findings suggest that both maternal depressive symptoms during pregnancy and toddler psychiatric problems may be associated with lower variability in the villous membrane thickness of peripheral villi in term placentas. This lower heterogeneity may compromise materno-fetal exchange, suggesting a possible role for altered placental morphology in the fetal programming of mental disorders.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29335435 PMCID: PMC5768752 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-19133-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of the Study Sample.
| Maternal Characteristics | Data Available(N) | Mean(SDa)/N(%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age at Delivery (years) | 88 | 31.5 (4.9) |
| Education, Tertiary | 88 | 57 (64.8%) |
| Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 88 | 24.0 (4.2) |
| Any Diabetic or Hypertensive Disorder in Pregnancy (type 1 or gestational diabetes, chronic or gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia), Yes | 88 | 15 (17.0%) |
| History of Physician-Diagnosed Mental Disorders Before Pregnancy, Yes | 80 | 13 (16.3%) |
| Depressive Symptoms | ||
| Trimester-Weighted Mean Score of Center for Epidemiological Studies | 86 | 10.3 (6.0) |
| Depression Scale Depressive Symptoms during Pregnancy | ||
| Trimester-Weighted Mean Score of Center for Epidemiological Studies | 86 | 14 (16.3%) |
| Depression Scale Depressive Symptoms during Pregnancy ≥ 16 | ||
| 1st Pregnancy Trimester Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression | 81 | 10.2 (6.7) |
| Scale Depressive Symptom Score | ||
| Mean of 2nd Pregnancy Trimester Center for Epidemiological Studies | 86 | 10.4 (6.5) |
| Depression Scale Depressive Symptom Scores | ||
| Mean of 3rd Pregnancy Trimester Center for Epidemiological Studies | 86 | 10.3 (6.6) |
| Depression Scale Depressive Symptom Scores | ||
| Number of Pregnancy Trimesters with Center for Epidemiological Studies | 81 | |
| 0 | 53 (65.4%) | |
| 1 | 16 (19.8%) | |
| 2–3 | 12 (14.8%) | |
| Beck Depression Inventory-II Score Concurrently to Rating the Child | 60 | 5.9 (5.5) |
| Placental Morphology | ||
| Volume of SMAb-Positive Villi per Placenta (ml) | 88 | 95.1 (50.9) |
| Volume of Capillaries per SMA-Positive Villi per Placenta (ml) | 88 | 56.0 (35.6) |
| Volume of SMAb-Negative Villi per Placenta (ml) | 88 | 182.7 (63.9) |
| Volume of Capillaries per SMAb-Negative Villi per Placenta (ml) | 88 | 157.5 (51.8) |
| Ratio of the Distribution of SMAb-Positive Villi to SMA-Negative Villi (%) | 88 | 63.7 (56.8) |
| Villous Barrier Thickness of SMAb-Positive Villi (µm) | 88 | 7.5 (1.7) |
| Standard Deviation of Villous Barrier Thickness of SMAb-Positive Villi (Variability in Thickness) (µm) | 88 | 6.3 (2.3) |
| Villous Barrier Thickness of SMAb-Negative Villi (µm) | 88 | 11.9 (4.6) |
| Standard Deviation of Villous Barrier Thickness of SMAb-Negative Villi (µm) | 88 | 10.2 (5.5) |
| Placental Weight (grams) | 88 | 589.7 (107.4) |
| Toddler Characteristics | ||
| Gestation Length (weeks) | 88 | 40.3 (1.0) |
| Sex | 88 | |
| Boys | 41 (46.6%) | |
| Girls | 47 (53.4%) | |
| Age at Follow-up (months) | 60 | 25.5 (2.9) |
| Child Behavior Checklist/1½-5 Psychiatric Problems | ||
| Total Problems | 60 | 46.8 (9.2) |
| Internalizing Problems | 60 | 45.4 (8.5) |
| Externalizing Problems | 60 | 48.6 (9.4) |
aSMA = γ-smooth muscle actin. bSD = standard deviation.
Maternal Depressive Symptoms across Pregnancy and Placental Morphology. Unstandardized regression coefficients (B) and their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) indicating standard deviation unit increase in placental morphology criteria per one standard deviation increase in maternal depressive symptoms across pregnancy from linear regression models where maternal depressive symptoms during pregnancy were used as predictors of placental morphology criteria.
| Placental Morphology Criteria | Maternal Depressive Symptoms during Pregnancy | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | ||||
| B(95% CI) | p | B(95% CI) | p | B(95% CI) | p | |
| Volume of SMA-positive villi per placenta | 0.06(−0.15;0.28) | 0.56 | 0.11(−0.11;0.33) | 0.34 | 0.11(−0.13;0.34) | 0.36 |
| Volume of capillaries per SMA-positive villi per placenta | 0.05(−0.17;0.27) | 0.65 | 0.09(−0.13;0.31) | 0.42 | 0.10(−0.14;0.34) | 0.41 |
| Volume of SMA-negative villi per placenta | −0.09(−0.33;0.14) | 0.43 | −0.08(−0.31;0.14) | 0.47 | −0.06(−0.30;0.18) | 0.64 |
| Volume of capillaries per SMA-negative villi per placenta | −0.13(−0.35;0.09) | 0.26 | −0.12(−0.34;0.10) | 0.28 | −0.10(−0.33;0.13) | 0.40 |
| Ratio of the distribution of stem villi to SMA-negative villi | 0.13(−0.09;0.34) | 0.26 | 0.16(−0.06;0.38) | 0.15 | 0.16(−0.07;0.40) | 0.18 |
| Villous barrier thickness of SMA-positive villi | −0.10(−0.32;0.12) | 0.36 | −0.12(−0.35;0.11) | 0.31 | −0.06(−0.30;0.18) | 0.60 |
| Standard deviation of villous barrier thickness of SMA-positive villi (variability in thickness) | −0.10(−0.31;0.13) | 0.42 | −0.08(−0.31;0.15) | 0.49 | −0.07(−0.32;0.18) | 0.57 |
| Villous barrier thickness of SMA-negative villi | −0.17(−0.38;0.04) | 0.12 | −0.21(−0.43;0.01) | 0.06 | −0.14(−0.37;0.09) | 0.22 |
| Standard deviation of villous barrier thickness of SMA-negative villi (variability in thickness) | −0.24(−0.46;−0.03) | 0.03 | −0.27(−0.50;−0.05) | 0.02 | −0.20(−0.43;0.04) | 0.096 |
SMA = γ-smooth muscle actin.
aModel 1 refers to unadjusted linear regression models.
bModel 2 refers to linear regression models adjusted for gestation length, maternal age at delivery, education, pre-pregnancy body mass index and diabetic and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
cModel 3 refers to linear regression models adjusted for model 2 covariates and maternal history of mental disorders before pregnancy.
Maternal Trimester-Specific Prenatal Depressive Symptoms and Placental Morphology.
| Depressive Symptoms during | 1st Pregnancy Trimester (n = 81) | 2nd Pregnancy Trimester (n = 86) | 3rd Pregnancy Trimester (n = 86) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placental Criteria | B(95% CI) | p | B(95% CI) | p | B(95% CI) | p |
| Volume of SMA-positive villi per placenta | ||||||
| Model 1 | 0.01(−0.22; 0.23) | 0.97 | 0.05(−0.16; 0.26) | 0.61 | 0.12(−0.09; 0.33) | 0.27 |
| Model 2 | 0.06(−0.18; 0.31) | 0.61 | 0.10(−0.11; 0.32) | 0.33 | 0.14(−0.07; 0.36) | 0.19 |
| Model 3 | 0.07(−0.18; 0.32) | 0.59 | 0.10 (−0.12; 0.32) | 0.37 | 0.15 (−0.08; 0.38) | 0.21 |
| Volume of capillaries per SMA-positive villi per placenta | ||||||
| Model 1 | 0.00(−0.23; 0.23) | 0.99 | 0.04(−0.17; 0.25) | 0.68 | 0.11(−0.11; 0.32) | 0.33 |
| Model 2 | 0.07(−0.17; 0.32) | 0.55 | 0.09(−0.13; 0.30) | 0.43 | 0.12(−0.10; 0.34) | 0.27 |
| Model 3 | 0.09(−0.17; 0.34) | 0.49 | 0.09(−0.14; 0.32) | 0.43 | 0.14(−0.10; 0.37) | 0.25 |
| Volume of SMA-negative villi per placenta | ||||||
| Model 1 | 0.05(−0.19; 0.29) | 0.70 | −0.07(−0.29; 0.14) | 0.48 | −0.16(−0.37; 0.06) | 0.15 |
| Model 2 | −0.01(−0.26; 0.25) | 0.97 | −0.05(−0.27; 0.17) | 0.66 | −0.13(−0.35; 0.09) | 0.23 |
| Model 3 | 0.01(−0.26; 0.28) | 0.94 | 0.02(−0.25; 0.21) | 0.86 | −0.11(−0.35; 0.13) | 0.36 |
| Volume of capillaries per SMA-negative villi per placenta | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.02(−0.22; 0.26) | 0.88 | −0.12(−0.33; 0.09) | 0.27 | −0.18(−0.40; 0.03) | 0.09 |
| Model 2 | −0.07(−0.32; 0.18) | 0.59 | −0.08(−0.29; 0.13) | 0.46 | −0.15(−0.36; 0.07) | 0.17 |
| Model 3 | −0.06(−0.32; 0.20) | 0.66 | −0.06(−0.28; 0.17) | 0.61 | −0.13(−0.37; 0.10) | 0.26 |
| Ratio of the distribution of stem villi to SMA-negative villi | ||||||
| Model 1 | 0.01(−0.23; 0.25) | 0.92 | 0.11(−0.10; 0.32) | 0.30 | 0.20(−0.01; 0.41) | 0.07 |
| Model 2 | 0.09(−0.16; 0.35) | 0.47 | 0.14(−0.07; 0.36) | 0.19 | 0.21(−0.01; 0.42) | 0.06 |
| Model 3 | 0.09(−0.17; 0.36) | 0.48 | 0.14(−0.09; 0.36) | 0.23 | 0.22(−0.02; 0.45) | 0.07 |
| Villous barrier thickness of SMA-positive villi | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.09(−0.33; 0.15) | 0.45 | −0.06(−0.27; 0.15) | 0.58 | −0.14(−0.35; 0.08) | 0.20 |
| Model 2 | −0.13(−0.39; 0.13) | 0.33 | −0.07(−0.29; 0.15) | 0.52 | −0.15(−0.38; 0.07) | 0.18 |
| Model 3 | −0.08(−0.34; 0.18) | 0.55 | −0.03(−0.25; 0.20) | 0.82 | −0.10(−0.34; 0.14) | 0.40 |
| Standard deviation of villous barrier thickness of SMA-positive villi (variability in thickness) | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.06(−0.30; 0.19) | 0.65 | −0.07(−0.28; 0.14) | 0.49 | −0.10(−0.32; 0.11) | 0.34 |
| Model 2 | −0.06(−0.32; 0.21) | 0.67 | −0.07(−0.29; 0.16) | 0.56 | −0.10(−0.33; 0.13) | 0.38 |
| Model 3 | −0.04(−0.32; 0.23) | 0.76 | −0.06(−0.29; 0.18) | 0.63 | −0.10(−0.34; 0.15) | 0.45 |
| Villous barrier thickness of SMA-negative villi | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.16(−0.40; 0.08) | 0.18 | −0.16(−0.36; 0.04) | 0.12 | −0.17(−0.38; 0.04) | 0.11 |
| Model 2 | −0.25(−0.50; 0.00) | 0.052 | −0.19(−0.40; 0.03) | 0.08 | −0.19(−0.40; 0.02) | 0.08 |
| Model 3 | −0.19(−0.44; 0.06) | 0.14 | −0.12(−0.34; 0.09) | 0.26 | −0.11(−0.34; 0.12) | 0.35 |
| Standard deviation of villous barrier thickness of SMA-negative villi (variability in thickness) | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.24(−0.48; −0.01) | 0.04 | −0.20(−0.40; 0.01) | 0.06 | −0.22(−0.43; −0.01) | 0.04 |
| Model 2 | −0.33(−0.58; −0.08) | 0.01 | −0.23(−0.44; −0.01) | 0.05 | −0.23(−0.45; −0.01) | 0.04 |
| Model 3 | −0.27(−0.53; −0.02) | 0.04 | −0.15(−0.37; 0.07) | 0.18 | −0.14(−0.37; 0.10) | 0.24 |
SMA = γ-smooth muscle actin.
Unstandardized regression coefficients (B) and their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) from linear regression models, indicating standard deviation unit increase in placental morphology criteria per one standard deviation increase in mean maternal depressive symptoms during each pregnancy trimester.
Regression Model 1 is unadjusted. Model 2 is adjusted for maternal age and education level, pre-pregnancy body mass index, hypertensive and diabetic disorders in pregnancy and gestation length. Model 3 is adjusted for Model 2 covariates and maternal history of mental disorders before pregnancy.
Figure 1(A) Maternal clinically significant antenatal depressive symptoms and placental SMA-negative villi villous barrier thickness variability. The figure shows the unadjusted mean values and 95% Confidence Intervals of the standard deviation of placental SMA-negative villi villous barrier thickness (in standard deviation units) for mothers with trimester-weighted mean antenatal depressive symptoms below or above the clinical cutoff of ≥16 points. P-values refer to group difference significances from unadjusted linear regression models (model 1), models adjusted for maternal age, education, pre-pregnancy BMI, hypertensive and diabetic disorders in pregnancy and gestation length (model 2), and models adjusted also for maternal history of physician-diagnosed mental disorders before pregnancy (model 3). (B) Maternal accumulative depressive symptoms during pregnancy and SMA-negative villi villous barrier thickness variability. The figure shows the unadjusted mean values and 95% Confidence Intervals of the standard deviation of SMA-negative villi villous barrier thickness in standard deviation units, according to the number of pregnancy trimesters [0, 1, 2–3] maternal depressive symptom scores during pregnancy were above the clinical cutoff of ≥16, when calculated from the value at the first trimester and mean values across second and third trimesters. P-values refer to the significances of group differences and linear trends from unadjusted linear regression models (model 1), models adjusted for maternal age, education, pre-pregnancy BMI, hypertensive and diabetic disorders in pregnancy and gestation length (model 2), and models adjusted also for maternal history of physician-diagnosed mental disorders before pregnancy (model 3).
Placental Morphology and Toddler Psychiatric Problems. Unstandardized regression coefficients (B) and their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) indicating standard deviation unit increase in toddler psychiatric problems per standard deviation increase in placental morphology criteria from linear regression models where placental morphology criteria were used to predict toddler psychiatric problems.
| Toddler Psychiatric Problem Scale | Total Problems | Internalizing Problems | Externalizing Problems | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placental Morphology Structure | B(95% CI) | p | B(95% CI) | p | B(95% CI) | p |
| Volume of SMA-positive villi per placenta | ||||||
| Model 1 | 0.02(−0.23; 0.27) | 0.88 | −0.03(−0.27; 0.19) | 0.77 | −0.05(−0.31; 0.21) | 0.70 |
| Model 2 | −0.00(−0.27; 0.27) | 0.98 | −0.05(−0.29; 0.19) | 0.69 | −0.08(−0.36; 0.20) | 0.58 |
| Model 3 | −0.04(−0.20; 0.27) | 0.76 | −0.02(−0.23; 0.20) | 0.88 | −0.04(−0.29; 0.22) | 0.78 |
| Volume of capillaries per SMA-positive villi per placenta | ||||||
| Model 1 | 0.02(−0.23; 0.27) | 0.90 | −0.03(−0.25; 0.20) | 0.81 | −0.05(−0.31; 0.21) | 0.68 |
| Model 2 | −0.02(−0.29; 0.25) | 0.87 | −0.07(−0.30; 0.17) | 0.59 | −0.08(−0.36; 0.20) | 0.58 |
| Model 3 | −0.01(−0.25; 0.23) | 0.92 | −0.05(−0.27; 0.16) | 0.63 | −0.08(−0.33; 0.17) | 0.54 |
| Volume of SMA-negative villi per placenta | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.05(−0.32; 0.23) | 0.72 | 0.04(−0.21; 0.29) | 0.75 | −0.11(−0.39; 0.18) | 0.46 |
| Model 2 | −0.12(−0.44; 0.19) | 0.44 | −0.02(−0.30; 0.26) | 0.88 | −0.20(−0.52; 0.13) | 0.22 |
| Model 3 | 0.05(−0.22; 0.32) | 0.71 | 0.13(−0.11; 0.37) | 0.28 | −0.03(−0.31; 0.26) | 0.84 |
| Volume of capillaries per SMA-negative villi per placenta | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.09(−0.35; 0.18) | 0.51 | −0.00(−0.24; 0.24) | 0.99 | −0.12(−0.40; 0.15) | 0.36 |
| Model 2 | −0.20(−0.51; 0.11) | 0.21 | −0.09(−0.37; 0.19) | 0.51 | −0.25(−0.57; 0.07) | 0.13 |
| Model 3 | 0.00(−0.26; 0.25) | 0.98 | 0.08(−0.15; 0.31) | 0.49 | −0.06(−0.33; 0.21) | 0.67 |
| Ratio of the distribution of SMA-positive villi to SMA-negative villi | ||||||
| Model 1 | 0.02(−0.23; 0.27) | 0.88 | −0.07(−0.30; 0.16) | 0.54 | 0.00(−0.26; 0.26) | 0.99 |
| Model 2 | 0.03(−0.25; 0.31) | 0.82 | −0.06(−0.30; 0.19) | 0.64 | 0.01 (−0.27; 0.30) | 0.92 |
| Model 3 | 0.01(−0.23; 0.25) | 0.92 | −0.08(−0.29; 0.14) | 0.48 | −0.00(−0.26; 0.25) | 0.97 |
| Villous barrier thickness of SMA-positive villi | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.08(−0.36; 0.21) | 0.60 | −0.12(−0.37; 0.14) | 0.36 | 0.02(−0.27; 0.31) | 0.89 |
| Model 2 | −0.11(−0.44; 0.21) | 0.48 | −0.19(−0.47; 0.09) | 0.18 | 0.01(−0.33; 0.35) | 0.95 |
| Model 3 | 0.02(−0.26; 0.29) | 0.91 | −0.04(−0.29; 0.21) | 0.75 | 0.10(−0.19; 0.39) | 0.49 |
| Standard deviation of villous barrier thickness of SMA positive villi (variability in thickness) | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.02(−0.28; 0.23) | 0.86 | 0.02(−0.21; 0.25) | 0.87 | −0.05(−0.31; 0.21) | 0.70 |
| Model 2 | −0.05(−0.32; 0.22) | 0.71 | −0.01(−0.25; 0.23) | 0.93 | −0.07(−0.35; 0.21) | 0.62 |
| Model 3 | 0.06(−0.19; 0.31) | 0.63 | 0.09(−0.13; 0.31) | 0.40 | 0.02(−0.24; 0.27) | 0.91 |
| Villous barrier thickness of SMA-negative villi | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.14(−0.42; 0.13) | 0.31 | −0.18(−0.42; 0.07) | 0.16 | −0.00(−0.29; 0.28) | 0.98 |
| Model 2 | −0.16(−0.45; 0.12) | 0.26 | −0.20(−0.45; 0.05) | 0.12 | −0.01(−0.31; 0.29) | 0.93 |
| Model 3 | −0.08(−0.34; 0.19) | 0.56 | −0.12(−0.36; 0.12) | 0.31 | 0.05(−0.23; 0.33) | 0.71 |
| Standard deviation of villous barrier thickness of SMA-negative villi (variability in thickness) | ||||||
| Model 1 | −0.34(−0.60; −0.07) | 0.01 | −0.32(−0.56; −0.08) | 0.01 | −0.20(−0.48; 0.09) | 0.17 |
| Model 2 | −0.35(−0.63; −0.07) | 0.01 | −0.34(−0.59; −0.10) | 0.01 | −0.21(−0.51; 0.09) | 0.16 |
| Model 3 | −0.29(−0.54; −0.03) | 0.03 | −0.28(−0.51; −0.05) | 0.02 | −0.15(−0.43; 0.13) | 0.28 |
SMA = γ-smooth muscle actin.
Model 1 is unadjusted. Model 2 is adjusted for toddler’s age and sex, gestation length, maternal age at childbirth, education, pre-pregnancy BMI and maternal diabetic and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Model 3 is adjusted for maternal depressive symptoms concurrently to assessing her child’s psychiatric problems.
Figure 2Immunohistochemical double labeling of perivascular sheath and fetal villous endothelium. (A) Shows an example of a γ-smooth-muscle-actin(SMA)-positive villus (indigo-blue in perivascular position; white arrows). The endothelium of fetal vessels is labelled (CD34: brown; black arrows), the villous stroma marked by asterisks and the trophoblast (bluish nuclei; shaded arrows) visible. (B) Exemplifies a SMA-negative villus (no SMA reactivity in perivascular position). The endothelium of fetal vessels is labelled (CD34: brown; black arrows), villous stroma marked by asterisks and trophoblast (bluish nuclei; shaded arrows) visible. Red arrow heads label vasculo-syncytial-membrane spots. (A) Scale bar is 25 µm and valid for (B).
Figure 3An illustration of the villous membrane thickness measurement principle. (A,B) Show examples of SMA-negative villi with endothelium labelled by CD34-reactivity (brown reaction product). (C,D) Show examples of SMA-positive villi (indigo-blue reaction product in perivascular position) with endothelium labelled by CD34-reactivity (brown reaction product). (A–D) We measured membrane thickness with the Nearest Neighbor analysis and the shortest distance (red line) from the trophoblast to the fetal endothelium by increasing a circle (red) from the trophoblast surface until first intersection with the endothelium. Exemplary measurement positions are marked with black arrows. Scale bar is 25 µm.