Literature DB >> 30783910

Response dynamics of event-based prospective memory retrieval in mouse tracking.

Jason L Hicks1, Samantha N Spitler2, Megan H Papesh2.   

Abstract

Prospective memory (PM) is typically measured using keypresses in laboratory paradigms, which therefore assess only discrete, stage-like processes. In the present study we manipulated focal and nonfocal PM cue conditions, as well as participants' focus on different aspects of the PM/ongoing task set, using the methodology to capture dynamic computer mouse movements. The software captured mouse trajectories during lexical decisions and PM responses. We replicated many findings typical in the PM literature, including the accuracy advantage for focal over nonfocal conditions and longer ongoing-task response times for nonfocal conditions. Participants' movement trajectories during PM responses revealed evidence for both spontaneous-retrieval and strategic-monitoring processes in focal and nonfocal PM retrieval conditions. During trials suggestive of spontaneous retrieval, mouse trajectories initially went toward the typical ongoing-task response but turned mid-trajectory toward the PM response field on the opposite side of the computer screen. In nonfocal conditions, these trajectory reversals had a wider arc and took longer to complete, reflecting the likely greater retrospective retrieval requirements of nonfocal conditions. Regarding what are more likely to be strategic-monitoring processes, a significant portion of responses traveled directly to the PM response field, as though people were prepared to make such a response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional monitoring; Mouse tracking; Prospective memory; Retrieval dynamics; Spontaneous retrieval

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30783910     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00909-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  M Kliegel; M Martin; M A McDaniel; G O Einstein
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2001-01

2.  Modeling criterion shifts and target checking in prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  Sebastian S Horn; Ute J Bayen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Gabriel I Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Retrieval experience in prospective memory: strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Beat Meier; Thomas D Zimmermann; Walter J Perrig
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-10

5.  The role of metacognition in prospective memory: anticipated task demands influence attention allocation strategies.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-07-13

6.  Memory in motion: movement dynamics reveal memory strength.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

7.  Mousetrap: An integrated, open-source mouse-tracking package.

Authors:  Pascal J Kieslich; Felix Henninger
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-10

8.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

9.  The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill Talley Shelton
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Stuck at the starting line: How the starting procedure influences mouse-tracking data.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Pascal J Kieslich
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach.

Authors:  Marcel Kurtz; Stefan Scherbaum; Moritz Walser; Philipp Kanske; Marcus Möschl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.