Literature DB >> 22711579

Memory in motion: movement dynamics reveal memory strength.

Megan H Papesh1, Stephen D Goldinger.   

Abstract

Recognition memory is typically examined as a discrete end-state, describable by static variables, such as accuracy, response time, and confidence. In the present study, we combined real-time mouse-tracking with subsequent, overt confidence estimates to examine the dynamic nature of memory decisions. By examining participants' streaming x-, y- mouse coordinates during recognition decisions, we observed that movement trajectories revealed underlying response confidence. More confident decisions were associated with shorter decision times and more linear response trajectories. Less confident decisions were made slowly, with increased trajectory curvature. Statistical indices of curvature and decision times, including area-under-the-curve and time to maximum deviation, suggested that memory strength relates to response dynamics. Whether participants were correct or incorrect, old responses showed a stronger correspondence between mouse trajectories and confidence, relative to new responses. We suggest that people subjectively experience a correspondence between feelings of memory and feelings of confidence; that subjective experience reveals itself in real-time decision processes, as suggested by sequential sampling models of recognition decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22711579      PMCID: PMC3458147          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0281-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  21 in total

1.  Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory.

Authors:  T A Busey; J Tunnicliff; G R Loftus; E F Loftus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought.

Authors:  James S Magnuson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors.

Authors:  Michael J Spivey; Marc Grosjean; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007).

Authors:  Colleen M Parks; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The emergent coordination of cognitive function.

Authors:  Christopher T Kello; Brandon C Beltz; John G Holden; Guy C Van Orden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

7.  A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory.

Authors:  Laura Mickes; John T Wixted; Peter E Wais
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

8.  Confidence-accuracy inversions in scene recognition: a remember-know analysis.

Authors:  I G Dobbins; N E Kroll; Q Liu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; M J Spivey-Knowlton; K M Eberhard; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The striking similarities between standard, distractor-free, and target-free recognition.

Authors:  Justin C Cox; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08
View more
  10 in total

1.  Response dynamics in prospective memory.

Authors:  Drew H Abney; Dawn M McBride; Angela M Conte; David W Vinson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  A Neural Mechanism of Social Categorization.

Authors:  Ryan M Stolier; Jonathan B Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Response dynamics of event-based prospective memory retrieval in mouse tracking.

Authors:  Jason L Hicks; Samantha N Spitler; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

4.  Deficits in the Use of Verb Bias Information in Real-Time Processing by College Students With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Jessica E Hall; Amanda Owen Van Horne; Karla K McGregor; Thomas A Farmer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Just out of reach: On the reliability of the action-sentence compatibility effect.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-12

6.  A State Space Approach to Dynamic Modeling of Mouse-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Antonio Calcagnì; Luigi Lombardi; Marco D'Alessandro; Francesca Freuli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-17

7.  The emotion storyboard: A method to examine social judgments of emotion.

Authors:  Kaitlin McCormick-Huhn; Stephanie A Shields
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The sweetest thing: the influence of angularity, symmetry, and the number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches.

Authors:  Alejandro Salgado-Montejo; Jorge A Alvarado; Carlos Velasco; Carlos J Salgado; Kendra Hasse; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

9.  When expectancies collide: Action dynamics reveal the interaction between stimulus plausibility and congruency.

Authors:  Moreno I Coco; Nicholas D Duran
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

10.  Response: Commentary: Pupil old/new effects reflect stimulus encoding and decoding in short-term memory.

Authors:  Andreas Brocher; Tim Graf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.