Literature DB >> 25151245

Modeling criterion shifts and target checking in prospective memory monitoring.

Sebastian S Horn1, Ute J Bayen1.   

Abstract

Event-based prospective memory (PM) involves remembering to perform intended actions after a delay. An important theoretical issue is whether and how people monitor the environment to execute an intended action when a target event occurs. Performing a PM task often increases the latencies in ongoing tasks. However, little is known about the reasons for this cost effect. This study uses diffusion model analysis to decompose monitoring processes in the PM paradigm. Across 4 experiments, performing a PM task increased latencies in an ongoing lexical decision task. A large portion of this effect was explained by consistent increases in boundary separation; additional increases in nondecision time emerged in a nonfocal PM task and explained variance in PM performance (Experiment 1), likely reflecting a target-checking strategy before and after the ongoing decision (Experiment 2). However, we found that possible target-checking strategies may depend on task characteristics. That is, instructional emphasis on the importance of ongoing decisions (Experiment 3) or the use of focal targets (Experiment 4) eliminated the contribution of nondecision time to the cost of PM, but left participants in a mode of increased cautiousness. The modeling thus sheds new light on the cost effect seen in many PM studies and suggests that people approach ongoing activities more cautiously when they need to remember an intended action. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151245     DOI: 10.1037/a0037676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  Selective effects of acute alcohol intake on the prospective and retrospective components of a prospective-memory task with emotional targets.

Authors:  Nora T Walter; Ute J Bayen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Y Peeta Li; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

3.  The importance of age-related differences in prospective memory: Evidence from diffusion model analyses.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Andrew J Aschenbrenner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

4.  Response dynamics of event-based prospective memory retrieval in mouse tracking.

Authors:  Jason L Hicks; Samantha N Spitler; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

5.  Integrated responding improves prospective memory accuracy.

Authors:  David Elliott; Luke Strickland; Shayne Loft; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Distinct monitoring strategies underlie costs and performance in prospective memory.

Authors:  Seth R Koslov; Landry S Bulls; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-04-06

7.  Wait a second . . . Boundary conditions on delayed responding theories of prospective memory.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Anne Vogel; Derek M Ellis; Gene A Brewer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Prior experience with target encounter affects attention allocation and prospective memory performance.

Authors:  Kara N Moore; James Michael Lampinen; Eryn J Adams; Blake L Nesmith; Presley Burch
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-05-07

9.  Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach.

Authors:  Marcel Kurtz; Stefan Scherbaum; Moritz Walser; Philipp Kanske; Marcus Möschl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.