| Literature DB >> 30775020 |
Andrew L Sussman1, Carla Cordova2, Mark R Burge3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recruitment and engagement for clinical and translational research is challenging, especially among medically underserved and ethnic or racial minority populations.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical Trials; Clinical and Translational Research; recruitment
Year: 2018 PMID: 30775020 PMCID: PMC6374319 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2018.324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Transl Sci ISSN: 2059-8661
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the Participant Recruitment Service at the University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center (CTSC). EHR, electronic health records; IRB, Institutional Review Board; PI, Principal Investigator; REDCap, real-time electronic data capture tool.
Results of a comprehensive, 3-pronged approach to recruitment for clinical and translational research studies at the University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center over the last 3 grant years
| Grant year (calendar year) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 (2015) | 7 (2016) | 8 (2017) | |
| Participant recruitment service | |||
| Number of protocols using the service | 2 | 5 | 4 |
| Number of calls made | 1663 | 1542 | 7887 |
| Number of contacts made (% of those called) | 539 (32%) | 374 (24%) | 834 (11%) |
| Number of patients responding affirmatively (% of those contacted) | 398 (74%) | 235 (63%) | 672 (81%) |
| Number of enrolled (% of those responding affirmatively) | 31 (8%) | 7 (3%) | 41 (6%) |
| Number of “Do Not Call” requests (cumulative) | 73 | 91 | 170 |
| Community engagement and research core | |||
| Number of protocols using the service | 22 | 22 | 24 |
| Number of enrolled | 272 | 642 | 294 |
| Number of geriatric participants enrolled (>64 years) (% of total) | 24 (9%) | 91 (14%) | 62 (21%) |
| Number of Hispanic/Latino participants enrolled (% of total) | 47 (17%) | 185 (29%) | 144 (49%) |
| Number of Native American participants enrolled (% of total) | 18 (7%) | 39 (6%) | 35 (12%) |
| Number of rural participants enrolled (% of total) | 3 (1%) | 38 (6%) | 126 (43%) |
| Average number of months to full enrollment | 19 | 12 | 16 |
| Community health specialist | |||
| Number of protocols using the service | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Number of community contacts | 0 | 21 | 33 |
| Number of community health workers registered with the UNM CTSC community health network | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Number of partnering clinics | 0 | 5 | 7 |
CTSC, Clinical and Translational Science Center; UNM, University of New Mexico.
Fig. 2Schematic representation the comprehensive, “3-pronged approach to participant recruitment at the University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center (UNM CTSC). Although these activities are routinely bidirectional between the research cores and their stakeholders, in the context of this report focusing on study recruitment, we have opted to depict our arrows as unidirectional, when appropriate, for the sake of clarity. CERC, community engagement and research core; CHS, community health specialist; CHW, community health worker; ISP, integrating special populations; PRS, participant recruitment service.