Literature DB >> 10227414

Mass mailing and staff experience in a total recruitment program for a clinical trial: the SHEP experience. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. Cooperative Research Group.

N Cosgrove1, N O Borhani, G Bailey, P Borhani, J Levin, M Hoffmeier, S Krieger, L C Lovato, H Petrovitch, T Vogt, A C Wilson, V Breeson, J L Probstfield.   

Abstract

The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) staff contacted 447,921 screenees, of whom 11,919 (2.7%) were originally eligible and 4,736 (1.1%) maintained eligibility and were randomized. The total number of participants enrolled at the 16 clinical centers ranged from 133 to 559. The low yield of screenees to randomizations resulted from the study design, not from low levels of agreement to participate, and required the employment of a variety of recruitment strategies in a prudent overall plan. SHEP was one of the first clinical trials to use mass mailing as a primary strategy of recruitment. The study used mailing lists from seven generic sources. More than 3.4 million letters of invitation were mailed; they yielded an overall response rate of 4.3%. Motor vehicle and voter registration lists provided the greatest numbers of names. Mailings to members of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and registrants of the Health Care Finance Administration (HCFA) provided the greatest response rates. Considerable variability in response rates existed among clinical centers using generically similar mailing lists. Generally, the number of hours spent on recruitment showed a positive, but not statistically significant, association with randomization yields. The recruitment yield was statistically significantly higher in clinics with experienced recruitment coordinators than in clinics with inexperienced ones (p = 0.0008). From these findings we conclude that mass mailing is an important strategy in an overall recruitment program, that the involvement of experienced recruitment staff is important, and that although the total time spent by staff on recruitment may also improve results, it matters less than the staff's level of recruiting experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10227414     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00055-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  15 in total

1.  Does sending a home safety questionnaire increase recruitment to an injury prevention trial? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Kendrick; M Watson; M Dewey; A J Woods
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  A web-based screening and accrual strategy for a cancer prevention clinical trial in healthy smokers.

Authors:  Arash Mohebati; Allison Knutson; Xi Kathy Zhou; Judith J Smith; Powel H Brown; Andrew J Dannenberg; Eva Szabo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Recruitment and Screening for the Testosterone Trials.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Laura Fluharty; Susan S Ellenberg; Thomas M Gill; Kristine E Ensrud; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Denise Cifelli; Glenn R Cunningham; Alvin M Matsumoto; Shalender Bhasin; Marco Pahor; John T Farrar; David Cella; Raymond C Rosen; Susan M Resnick; Ronald S Swerdloff; Cora E Lewis; Mark E Molitch; Jill P Crandall; Alisa J Stephens-Shields; Thomas W Strorer; Christina Wang; Stephen Anton; Shehzad Basaria; Susan Diem; Vafa Tabatabaie; Darlene Dougar; Xiaoling Hou; Peter J Snyder
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Recruitment strategies and challenges in a large intervention trial: Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

Authors:  Thomas M Ramsey; Joni K Snyder; Laura C Lovato; Christianne L Roumie; Steven P Glasser; Nora M Cosgrove; Christine M Olney; Rocky H Tang; Karen C Johnson; Carolyn H Still; Lisa H Gren; Jeffery C Childs; Osa L Crago; John H Summerson; Sandy M Walsh; Letitia H Perdue; Denise M Bankowski; David C Goff
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Challenges to recruitment and retention of African Americans in the gene-environment trial of response to dietary interventions (GET READI) for heart health.

Authors:  Betty M Kennedy; David W Harsha; Ebony B Bookman; Yolanda R Hill; Tuomo Rankinen; Ruben Q Rodarte; Connie D Murla
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2011-08-23

6.  Use of voter registration records to recruit a representative sample.

Authors:  Erika H Westling; Sarah E Hampson; Lisa A Strycker; Deborah J Toobert
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-01-25

Review 7.  Recruitment and Retention of South Asian Ethnic Minority Populations in Behavioral Interventions to Improve Type 2 Diabetes Outcomes.

Authors:  Bushra Mahmood; Rowshanak Afshar; Tricia S Tang
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Depression and self-rated health are proximal predictors of episodes of sustained change in pain in independently living, community dwelling elders.

Authors:  Andrea L Rosso; Rollin M Gallagher; Mark Luborsky; Jana M Mossey
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Research with severely mentally ill Latinas: successful recruitment and retention strategies.

Authors:  Sana Loue; Martha Sajatovic
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2008-04

10.  The Enabling Reduction of Low-Grade Inflammation in Seniors (ENRGISE) Pilot Study: Screening Methods and Recruitment Results.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Todd M Manini; Laura Lovato; Jennifer Talton; Steven D Anton; Kathryn Domanchuk; Kimberly Kennedy; Cynthia L Stowe; Michael Walkup; Roger A Fielding; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Mary M McDermott; Anne B Newman; Walter T Ambrosius; Marco Pahor
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.053

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.