Literature DB >> 25189709

Comparison of electronic health record system functionalities to support the patient recruitment process in clinical trials.

Björn Schreiweis1, Benjamin Trinczek2, Felix Köpcke3, Thomas Leusch4, Raphael W Majeed5, Joachim Wenk6, Björn Bergh7, Christian Ohmann6, Rainer Röhrig5, Martin Dugas2, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reusing data from electronic health records for clinical and translational research and especially for patient recruitment has been tackled in a broader manner since about a decade. Most projects found in the literature however focus on standalone systems and proprietary implementations at one particular institution often for only one singular trial and no generic evaluation of EHR systems for their applicability to support the patient recruitment process does yet exist. Thus we sought to assess whether the current generation of EHR systems in Germany provides modules/tools, which can readily be applied for IT-supported patient recruitment scenarios.
METHODS: We first analysed the EHR portfolio implemented at German University Hospitals and then selected 5 sites with five different EHR implementations covering all major commercial systems applied in German University Hospitals. Further, major functionalities required for patient recruitment support have been defined and the five sample EHRs and their standard tools have been compared to the major functionalities.
RESULTS: In our analysis of the site's hospital information system environments (with four commercial EHR systems and one self-developed system) we found that - even though no dedicated module for patient recruitment has been provided - most EHR products comprise generic tools such as workflow engines, querying capabilities, report generators and direct SQL-based database access which can be applied as query modules, screening lists and notification components for patient recruitment support. A major limitation of all current EHR products however is that they provide no dedicated data structures and functionalities for implementing and maintaining a local trial registry.
CONCLUSIONS: At the five sites with standard EHR tools the typical functionalities of the patient recruitment process could be mostly implemented. However, no EHR component is yet directly dedicated to support research requirements such as patient recruitment. We recommend for future developments that EHR customers and vendors focus much more on the provision of dedicated patient recruitment modules.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Electronic health records; Hospital information systems; Patient selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25189709     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  13 in total

1.  Clinical Research Informatics: Recent Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  M Dugas
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

2.  Information Technology for Clinical, Translational and Comparative Effectiveness Research. Findings from the Yearbook 2015 Section on Clinical Research Informatics.

Authors:  C Daniel; R Choquet
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

3.  Part 1: The Wider Considerations in Translating Heart Failure Guidelines.

Authors:  Pupalan Iyngkaran; Andrew Wilson; James Wong; David Prior; David Kaye; David L Hare; Peter Bergin; Michael Jelinem
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021

4.  A Comprehensive Approach to Community Recruitment for Clinical and Translational Research.

Authors:  Andrew L Sussman; Carla Cordova; Mark R Burge
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-11-27

5. 

Authors:  C Daniel
Journal:  Rev Med Interne       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 0.728

6.  Defining Disease Phenotypes in Primary Care Electronic Health Records by a Machine Learning Approach: A Case Study in Identifying Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Shang-Ming Zhou; Fabiola Fernandez-Gutierrez; Jonathan Kennedy; Roxanne Cooksey; Mark Atkinson; Spiros Denaxas; Stefan Siebert; William G Dixon; Terence W O'Neill; Ernest Choy; Cathie Sudlow; Sinead Brophy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cross border semantic interoperability for clinical research: the EHR4CR semantic resources and services.

Authors:  Christel Daniel; David Ouagne; Eric Sadou; Kerstin Forsberg; Mark Mc Gilchrist; Eric Zapletal; Nicolas Paris; Sajjad Hussain; Marie-Christine Jaulent; Dipka Kalra
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2016-07-20

8.  MIRACUM: Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University Medicine.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Till Acker; Johannes Bernarding; Harald Binder; Martin Boeker; Melanie Boerries; Philipp Daumke; Thomas Ganslandt; Jürgen Hesser; Gunther Höning; Michael Neumaier; Kurt Marquardt; Harald Renz; Hermann-Josef Rothkötter; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Paul Schmücker; Jürgen Schüttler; Martin Sedlmayr; Hubert Serve; Keywan Sohrabi; Holger Storf
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.176

9.  An initiative using informatics to facilitate clinical research planning and recruitment in the VA health care system.

Authors:  Kandi E Velarde; Jennifer M Romesser; Marcus R Johnson; Daniel O Clegg; Olga Efimova; Steven J Oostema; Jeffrey S Scehnet; Scott L DuVall; Grant D Huang
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-07-10

10.  Heregulin (HRG) assessment for clinical trial eligibility testing in a molecular registry (PRAEGNANT) in Germany.

Authors:  Hanna Huebner; Christian M Kurbacher; Geoffrey Kuesters; Andreas D Hartkopf; Michael P Lux; Jens Huober; Bernhard Volz; Florin-Andrei Taran; Friedrich Overkamp; Hans Tesch; Lothar Häberle; Diana Lüftner; Markus Wallwiener; Volkmar Müller; Matthias W Beckmann; Erik Belleville; Matthias Ruebner; Michael Untch; Peter A Fasching; Wolfgang Janni; Tanja N Fehm; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sara Y Brucker; Andreas Schneeweiss; Johannes Ettl
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.