Literature DB >> 30755503

Can Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Be Safely Placed in Patients with Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy? A Retrospective Study of Almost 400,000 Catheter-Days.

Sara Campagna1, Silvia Gonella2, Paola Berchialla3, Giacomo Morano4, Carla Rigo5, Pietro Antonio Zerla6, Raffaella Fuzzi7, Gianvito Corona8, Silvana Storto4, Valerio Dimonte1,9, Baudolino Mussa9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are central venous catheters (CVCs) that are commonly used in onco-hematologic settings for chemotherapy administration. As there is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific CVC for chemotherapy administration, we aimed to ascertain PICC-related adverse events (AEs) and identify independent predictors of PICC removal in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information on adult patients with cancer with a PICC inserted for chemotherapy administration between September 2007 and December 2014 was extracted from six hospital databases. The primary outcome was PICC removal due to PICC-related AEs (occlusion, infection, or symptomatic thrombosis). Independent predictors of PICC removal were identified using a multivariate Cox regression model.
RESULTS: Among the 2,477 included patients, 419 PICC-related AEs (16.9%; 1.09 AEs per 1,000 PICC-days) were reported. AEs increased when PICC was inserted at the brachial site (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.84) and with open systems (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.24-2.88) and decreased in older men (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81).
CONCLUSION: Use of PICC for chemotherapy administration was associated with a low all-AEs rate. The basilic vein was the safer site, and valved systems had fewer AEs than open systems. More research is needed to explore the interaction between AEs, sex, and age. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These findings provide clinicians with evidence that peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are safe for chemotherapy administration. They also suggest that clinicians should limit the use of open systems when long chemotherapy regimens are scheduled. Moreover, alternatives to PICCs should be considered when administering chemotherapy to young men. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Hematologic neoplasms; Medical oncology; Patient safety; Peripheral catheterization; Vascular access devices

Year:  2019        PMID: 30755503      PMCID: PMC6738314          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  34 in total

1.  Risk of symptomatic DVT associated with peripherally inserted central catheters.

Authors:  R Scott Evans; Jamie H Sharp; Lorraine H Linford; James F Lloyd; Jacob S Tripp; Jason P Jones; Scott C Woller; Scott M Stevens; C Gregory Elliott; Lindell K Weaver
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies.

Authors:  Dennis G Maki; Daniel M Kluger; Christopher J Crnich
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients: a patient-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective studies.

Authors:  W Saber; T Moua; E C Williams; M Verso; G Agnelli; S Couban; A Young; M De Cicco; R Biffi; C J van Rooden; M V Huisman; D Fagnani; C Cimminiello; M Moia; M Magagnoli; S P Povoski; S F Malak; A Y Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Triple-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter in patients in the critical care unit: prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Scott O Trerotola; S William Stavropoulos; Jeffrey I Mondschein; Aalpen A Patel; Neil Fishman; Barry Fuchs; Daniel M Kolansky; Scott Kasner; John Pryor; Jesse Chittams
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Incidence of thrombotic complications in patients with haematological malignancies with central venous catheters: a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Agostino Cortelezzi; Marco Moia; Anna Falanga; Enrico M Pogliani; Giancarlo Agnelli; Erminio Bonizzoni; Gualberto Gussoni; Tiziano Barbui; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Efficacy of multifaceted interventions in reducing complications of peripherally inserted central catheter in adult oncology patients.

Authors:  Geng Tian; Yan Zhu; Li Qi; Fengqin Guo; Haidan Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Predictors of success in nurse-performed ultrasound-guided cannulation.

Authors:  Brian Chinnock; Stephen Thornton; Gregory W Hendey
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  High rate of complications associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in patients with solid tumours.

Authors:  K Cheong; D Perry; C Karapetis; B Koczwara
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.048

Review 9.  Vascular access in oncology patients.

Authors:  Maurizio Gallieni; Mauro Pittiruti; Roberto Biffi
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Clinical experience with power-injectable PICCs in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Mauro Pittiruti; Alberto Brutti; Davide Celentano; Massimiliano Pomponi; Daniele G Biasucci; Maria Giuseppina Annetta; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  6 in total

1.  Conditional catheter-related thrombosis free probability and risk-adapted choices of catheter for lung cancer.

Authors:  Yanfeng Wang; Chanjuan Cui; Xin Liu; Lei Deng; Ke Yang; Bin Li; Jie Xue; Junying Xie; Wei Cui
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with multiple insertions of the peripherally inserted central catheter in patients with hematological disorders.

Authors:  Yoshinori Hashimoto; Rina Hosoda; Hiromi Omura; Takayuki Tanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The anticoagulants rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin prevent PICC-related upper extremity venous thrombosis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Shoutian Lv; Yongmei Liu; Gang Wei; Xueyan Shi; Shaoping Chen; Xuehui Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Construction of a rabbit model with vinorelbine administration via peripherally inserted central catheter and dynamic monitoring of changes in phlebitis and thrombosis.

Authors:  Liquan Huang; Guiyuan Chen; Qinghua Hu; Bo Hu; Louying Zhu; Luyan Fang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Benefits of an online multimodal nursing program among patients with peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Meilian Xie; Shan Zhao; Yingtong Chen; Liying Wu; Xiuqun Zeng
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20

6.  Analysis of risk factors of PICC-related bloodstream infection in newborns: implications for nursing care.

Authors:  Yan Hu; Yun Ling; Yingying Ye; Lu Zhang; Xiaojing Xia; Qianwen Jiang; Fang Sun
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.175

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.