BACKGROUND: Knowledge of independent, baseline risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) may help select adult cancer patients who are at high risk to receive thromboprophylaxis. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data to identify these baseline risk factors. PATIENTS/ METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, DARE and the Grey literature databases were searched in all languages from 1995 to 2008. Prospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible. Studies were included if original patient-level data were provided by the investigators and if CRT was objectively confirmed with valid imaging. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of 17 prespecified baseline characteristics was conducted. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. RESULTS: A total sample of 5636 subjects from five RCTs and seven prospective studies was included in the analysis. Among these subjects, 425 CRT events were observed. In multivariate logistic regression, the use of implanted ports as compared with peripherally implanted central venous catheters (PICCs), decreased CRT risk (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80), whereas past history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.05-3.92), subclavian venipuncture insertion technique (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.07-4.34) and improper catheter tip location (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.22-3.02), increased CRT risk. CONCLUSIONS: CRT risk is increased with use of PICCs, previous history of DVT, subclavian venipuncture insertion technique and improper positioning of the catheter tip. These factors may be useful for risk stratifying patients to select those for thromboprophylaxis. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of independent, baseline risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) may help select adult cancerpatients who are at high risk to receive thromboprophylaxis. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data to identify these baseline risk factors. PATIENTS/ METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, DARE and the Grey literature databases were searched in all languages from 1995 to 2008. Prospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible. Studies were included if original patient-level data were provided by the investigators and if CRT was objectively confirmed with valid imaging. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of 17 prespecified baseline characteristics was conducted. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. RESULTS: A total sample of 5636 subjects from five RCTs and seven prospective studies was included in the analysis. Among these subjects, 425 CRT events were observed. In multivariate logistic regression, the use of implanted ports as compared with peripherally implanted central venous catheters (PICCs), decreased CRT risk (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80), whereas past history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.05-3.92), subclavian venipuncture insertion technique (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.07-4.34) and improper catheter tip location (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.22-3.02), increased CRT risk. CONCLUSIONS: CRT risk is increased with use of PICCs, previous history of DVT, subclavian venipuncture insertion technique and improper positioning of the catheter tip. These factors may be useful for risk stratifying patients to select those for thromboprophylaxis. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
Authors: M De Cicco; M Matovic; L Balestreri; A Steffan; R Pacenzia; M Malafronte; D Fantin; C A Bertuzzi; F Fabiani; S Morassut; E Bidoli; A Veronesi Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M E Eastman; M Khorsand; D G Maki; E C Williams; K Kim; P M Sondel; J H Schiller; M R Albertini Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R Biffi; F De Braud; F Orsi; S Pozzi; P Arnaldi; A Goldhirsch; N Rotmensz; C Robertson; M Bellomi; B Andreoni Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A Cortelezzia; N S Fracchiolla; P Maisonneuve; M Moia; C Luchesini; M L Ranzi; P Monni; M C Pasquini; G Lambertenghi-Deliliers Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2003-09
Authors: Cornelis J Van Rooden; Frits R Rosendaal; A Edo Meinders; Jacques A Van Oostayen; Felix J M Van Der Meer; Menno V Huisman Journal: Haematologica Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: L Lefebvre; E Noyon; D Georgescu; V Proust; C Alexandru; M Leheurteur; J C Thery; L Savary; O Rigal; F Di Fiore; C Veyret; F Clatot Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn Journal: Chest Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: A J Muñoz Martín; E Gallardo Díaz; I García Escobar; R Macías Montero; V Martínez-Marín; V Pachón Olmos; P Pérez Segura; T Quintanar Verdúguez; M Salgado Fernández Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.405