Literature DB >> 20574104

Triple-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter in patients in the critical care unit: prospective evaluation.

Scott O Trerotola1, S William Stavropoulos, Jeffrey I Mondschein, Aalpen A Patel, Neil Fishman, Barry Fuchs, Daniel M Kolansky, Scott Kasner, John Pryor, Jesse Chittams.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate outcomes associated with use of a triple-lumen (TL) peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled in this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study. Informed consent was obtained. All patients were in one hospital's ICUs and needed intermediate-term central venous access requiring three lumina. A 6-F tapered TL PICC was placed by a bedside nursing-based team with backup from the Interventional Radiology department. Placement complications, as well as long-term complications, were recorded. At catheter removal, ultrasonography (US) of the veins containing the TL PICC was performed to detect occult venous thrombosis. Regardless of indication for removal, catheters were sent for culture to detect colonization.
RESULTS: The study was stopped prematurely after 50 of a planned 167 patients were enrolled when a scheduled interim analysis detected a venous thrombosis rate that was considered unacceptably high by the study oversight committee (thrombosis was symptomatic in 20% of patients [10 of 50]). Venous thrombosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic) was detected in 26 of 45 patients (58%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 43%, 72%) examined with US. Documented catheter-related bloodstream infection did not occur (0%; 95% CI: 0%, 7%); colonization was detected in three of 29 catheter tips sent for culture (10%; 95% CI: 2%, 27%). Catheter malfunction and dislodgment occurred in one patient each.
CONCLUSION: The TL PICC design used in this study resulted in unacceptably high venous thrombosis rates. Even when used in a high-risk setting for infection (ie, the ICU), rates of clinically evident infection and colonization were absent and low, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20574104     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

Review 1.  Interventional Therapy for Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Timothy A Carlon; Deepak Sudheendra
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Risk factors associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related large vein thrombosis in neurological intensive care patients.

Authors:  Thomas J Wilson; Devin L Brown; William J Meurer; William R Stetler; D Andrew Wilkinson; Jeffrey J Fletcher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Peripherally inserted central catheters are equivalent to centrally inserted catheters in intensive care unit patients for central venous pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Heath E Latham; Scott T Rawson; Timothy T Dwyer; Chirag C Patel; Jo A Wick; Steven Q Simpson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Risk factors for venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters.

Authors:  Longfang Pan; Qianru Zhao; Xiangmei Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 5.  Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Paolo Cotogni; Mauro Pittiruti
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11-04

6.  Catheter-related thrombosis: A practical approach.

Authors:  Caroline Wall; John Moore; Jecko Thachil
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-12-03

Review 7.  Reducing catheter-related thrombosis using a risk reduction tool centered on catheter to vessel ratio.

Authors:  Timothy R Spencer; Keegan J Mahoney
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Association between prior peripherally inserted central catheters and lack of functioning arteriovenous fistulas: a case-control study in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Mireille El Ters; Gregory J Schears; Sandra J Taler; Amy W Williams; Robert C Albright; Bernice M Jenson; Amy L Mahon; Andrew H Stockland; Sanjay Misra; Scott L Nyberg; Andrew D Rule; Marie C Hogan
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Impact of postplacement adjustment of peripherally inserted central catheters on the risk of bloodstream infection and venous thrombus formation.

Authors:  Sanjiv M Baxi; Emily K Shuman; Christy A Scipione; Benrong Chen; Aditi Sharma; Jennifer J K Rasanathan; Carol E Chenoweth
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  An in vitro study comparing a peripherally inserted central catheter to a conventional central venous catheter: no difference in static and dynamic pressure transmission.

Authors:  Heath E Latham; Timothy T Dwyer; Bethene L Gregg; Steven Q Simpson
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.