Joshua Schulman-Marcus1, Kellsey Peterson2, Riju Banerjee3, Sanjay Samy4, Neil Yager3. 1. Division of Cardiology, Albany Medical Center, 47 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY, 12208, USA. schulmj1@amc.edu. 2. Division of Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Albany Medical Center, 47 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY, 12208, USA. 4. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a growing cohort of complex high-risk patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) who present for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). These patients are older, have complex coronary disease, and a substantial comorbidity burden including frailty. The procedural risks and outcomes of CABG and PCI in these patients are more difficult to assess based on the available literature, which has generally studied a younger population with a lower comorbidity burden. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been initiatives to recalibrate and expand risk models derived from procedural registries to inform the care of complex higher-risk patients, including patients "turned down" for CABG. There is greater recognition of the need for improved assessment of risk, quality, and benefits of coronary revascularization in higher-risk SIHD patients with a substantial comorbidity burden. Clinicians and patients should be aware that there are significant evidence gaps regarding revascularization in complex high-risk patients. The limitations of procedural-derived risk scores should be understood when presenting treatment options. Future randomized controlled trials and expanded registries are greatly desired and should be achievable. Meanwhile, a multidisciplinary heart team approach should be employed for proper decision-making.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a growing cohort of complex high-risk patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) who present for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). These patients are older, have complex coronary disease, and a substantial comorbidity burden including frailty. The procedural risks and outcomes of CABG and PCI in these patients are more difficult to assess based on the available literature, which has generally studied a younger population with a lower comorbidity burden. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been initiatives to recalibrate and expand risk models derived from procedural registries to inform the care of complex higher-risk patients, including patients "turned down" for CABG. There is greater recognition of the need for improved assessment of risk, quality, and benefits of coronary revascularization in higher-risk SIHD patients with a substantial comorbidity burden. Clinicians and patients should be aware that there are significant evidence gaps regarding revascularization in complex high-risk patients. The limitations of procedural-derived risk scores should be understood when presenting treatment options. Future randomized controlled trials and expanded registries are greatly desired and should be achievable. Meanwhile, a multidisciplinary heart team approach should be employed for proper decision-making.
Authors: Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David M Shahian; Sean M O'Brien; Shubin Sheng; Frederick L Grover; John E Mayer; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Jocelyn M Weiss; Elizabeth R Delong; Eric D Peterson; William S Weintraub; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Lloyd W Klein; Richard E Shaw; Kirk N Garratt; Issam D Moussa; Cynthia M Shewan; George D Dangas; Fred H Edwards Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eric D Peterson; David Dai; Elizabeth R DeLong; J Matthew Brennan; Mandeep Singh; Sunil V Rao; Richard E Shaw; Matthew T Roe; Kalon K L Ho; Lloyd W Klein; Ronald J Krone; William S Weintraub; Ralph G Brindis; John S Rumsfeld; John A Spertus Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andrew W ElBardissi; Sary F Aranki; Shubin Sheng; Sean M O'Brien; Caprice C Greenberg; James S Gammie Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jonathan Afilalo; Salvatore Mottillo; Mark J Eisenberg; Karen P Alexander; Nicolas Noiseux; Louis P Perrault; Jean-Francois Morin; Yves Langlois; Samuel M Ohayon; Johanne Monette; Jean-Francois Boivin; David M Shahian; Howard Bergman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-03-06
Authors: William E Boden; Robert A O'Rourke; Koon K Teo; Pamela M Hartigan; David J Maron; William J Kostuk; Merril Knudtson; Marcin Dada; Paul Casperson; Crystal L Harris; Bernard R Chaitman; Leslee Shaw; Gilbert Gosselin; Shah Nawaz; Lawrence M Title; Gerald Gau; Alvin S Blaustein; David C Booth; Eric R Bates; John A Spertus; Daniel S Berman; G B John Mancini; William S Weintraub Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William S Weintraub; John A Spertus; Paul Kolm; David J Maron; Zefeng Zhang; Claudine Jurkovitz; Wei Zhang; Pamela M Hartigan; Cheryl Lewis; Emir Veledar; Jim Bowen; Sandra B Dunbar; Christi Deaton; Stanley Kaufman; Robert A O'Rourke; Ron Goeree; Paul G Barnett; Koon K Teo; William E Boden; G B J Mancini Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-08-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patrick W Serruys; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Elisabeth Ståhle; Ted E Feldman; Marcel van den Brand; Eric J Bass; Nic Van Dyck; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Bindu Kalesan; Emanuele Barbato; Pim A L Tonino; Zsolt Piroth; Nikola Jagic; Sven Möbius-Winkler; Sven Mobius-Winckler; Gilles Rioufol; Nils Witt; Petr Kala; Philip MacCarthy; Thomas Engström; Keith G Oldroyd; Kreton Mavromatis; Ganesh Manoharan; Peter Verlee; Ole Frobert; Nick Curzen; Jane B Johnson; Peter Jüni; William F Fearon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert L Frye; Phyllis August; Maria Mori Brooks; Regina M Hardison; Sheryl F Kelsey; Joan M MacGregor; Trevor J Orchard; Bernard R Chaitman; Saul M Genuth; Suzanne H Goldberg; Mark A Hlatky; Teresa L Z Jones; Mark E Molitch; Richard W Nesto; Edward Y Sako; Burton E Sobel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-06-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lauren V Huckaby; Thomas G Gleason; Francis D Ferdinand; Ibrahim Sultan; Danny Chu; Pyongsoo Yoon; Forozan Navid; Siva Venkata; David West; Claudio Lima; Victor Morell; Shangzhen Chen; Floyd Thoma; Sasha Drew; Arman Kilic Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Michael N Young; Dhaval Kolte; Mary E Cadigan; Elizabeth Laikhter; Kevin Sinclair; Eugene Pomerantsev; Michael A Fifer; Thoralf M Sundt; Robert W Yeh; Farouc A Jaffer Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 5.501