BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment for patients with both type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease has not been established. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2368 patients with both type 2 diabetes and heart disease to undergo either prompt revascularization withintensive medical therapy or intensive medical therapy alone and to undergo either insulin-sensitization or insulin-provision therapy. Primary end points were the rate of death and a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (major cardiovascular events). Randomization was stratified according to the choice of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the more appropriate intervention. RESULTS: At 5 years, rates of survival did not differ significantly between the revascularization group (88.3%) and the medical-therapy group (87.8%, P=0.97) or between the insulin-sensitization group (88.2%) and the insulin-provision group (87.9%, P=0.89). The rates of freedom from major cardiovascular events also did not differ significantly among the groups: 77.2% in the revascularization group and 75.9% in the medical-treatment group (P=0.70) and 77.7% in the insulin-sensitization group and 75.4% in the insulin-provision group (P=0.13). In the PCI stratum, there was no significant difference in primary end points between the revascularization group and the medical-therapy group. In the CABG stratum, the rate of major cardiovascular events was significantly lower in the revascularization group (22.4%) than in the medical-therapy group (30.5%, P=0.01; P=0.002 for interaction between stratum and study group). Adverse events and serious adverse events were generally similar among the groups, although severe hypoglycemia was more frequent in the insulin-provision group (9.2%) than in the insulin-sensitization group (5.9%, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no significant difference in the rates of death and major cardiovascular events between patients undergoing prompt revascularization and those undergoing medical therapy or between strategies of insulin sensitization and insulin provision. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006305.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment for patients with both type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease has not been established. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2368 patients with both type 2 diabetes and heart disease to undergo either prompt revascularization with intensive medical therapy or intensive medical therapy alone and to undergo either insulin-sensitization or insulin-provision therapy. Primary end points were the rate of death and a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (major cardiovascular events). Randomization was stratified according to the choice of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the more appropriate intervention. RESULTS: At 5 years, rates of survival did not differ significantly between the revascularization group (88.3%) and the medical-therapy group (87.8%, P=0.97) or between the insulin-sensitization group (88.2%) and the insulin-provision group (87.9%, P=0.89). The rates of freedom from major cardiovascular events also did not differ significantly among the groups: 77.2% in the revascularization group and 75.9% in the medical-treatment group (P=0.70) and 77.7% in the insulin-sensitization group and 75.4% in the insulin-provision group (P=0.13). In the PCI stratum, there was no significant difference in primary end points between the revascularization group and the medical-therapy group. In the CABG stratum, the rate of major cardiovascular events was significantly lower in the revascularization group (22.4%) than in the medical-therapy group (30.5%, P=0.01; P=0.002 for interaction between stratum and study group). Adverse events and serious adverse events were generally similar among the groups, although severe hypoglycemia was more frequent in the insulin-provision group (9.2%) than in the insulin-sensitization group (5.9%, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no significant difference in the rates of death and major cardiovascular events between patients undergoing prompt revascularization and those undergoing medical therapy or between strategies of insulin sensitization and insulin provision. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006305.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: Bo Lagerqvist; Steen Husted; Fredrik Kontny; Elisabeth Ståhle; Eva Swahn; Lars Wallentin Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-09-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Theodore Mazzone; Peter M Meyer; Steven B Feinstein; Michael H Davidson; George T Kondos; Ralph B D'Agostino; Alfonso Perez; Jean-Claude Provost; Steven M Haffner Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-11-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: William Duckworth; Carlos Abraira; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Nicholas Emanuele; Peter D Reaven; Franklin J Zieve; Jennifer Marks; Stephen N Davis; Rodney Hayward; Stuart R Warren; Steven Goldman; Madeline McCarren; Mary Ellen Vitek; William G Henderson; Grant D Huang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Erland Erdmann; John A Dormandy; Bernard Charbonnel; Massimo Massi-Benedetti; Ian K Moules; Allan M Skene Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-04-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Richard A Kronmal; Joshua I Barzilay; Russell P Tracy; Peter J Savage; Trevor J Orchard; Gregory L Burke Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: S Yusuf; D Zucker; P Peduzzi; L D Fisher; T Takaro; J W Kennedy; K Davis; T Killip; E Passamani; R Norris Journal: Lancet Date: 1994-08-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Steven E Nissen; Stephen J Nicholls; Kathy Wolski; Richard Nesto; Stuart Kupfer; Alfonso Perez; Horacio Jure; Robert De Larochellière; Cezar S Staniloae; Kreton Mavromatis; Jacqueline Saw; Bo Hu; A Michael Lincoff; E Murat Tuzcu Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Whady Hueb; Neuza Lopes; Paulo R Soares; Bernard J Gersh; Eduardo Gomes Lima; Ricardo D Oliveira Vieira; Cibele Larrosa Garzillo; Rosa Rhami Garcia; Alexandre Costa Pereira; Celia Maria Strunz; Claudio Meneguetti; Jeane Tsutsui; Jose Parga; Pedro Lemos; Alexandre Hueb; Augusto Ushida; Raul Maranhão; Dalton A Chamone; Jose Af Ramires Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 2.298