Literature DB >> 33127404

High-Risk Committee for Cardiac Surgery Decision-Making: Results From 110 Consecutive Patients.

Lauren V Huckaby1, Thomas G Gleason1, Francis D Ferdinand1, Ibrahim Sultan1, Danny Chu1, Pyongsoo Yoon1, Forozan Navid1, Siva Venkata1, David West1, Claudio Lima1, Victor Morell1, Shangzhen Chen1, Floyd Thoma1, Sasha Drew1, Arman Kilic2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated our institutional experience in forming a surgeon-based committee to discuss and provide consensus opinion on high-risk cardiac surgical cases.
METHODS: The committee consisted of 4 surgeons with at least 1 senior surgeon at any given time with a rotating schedule. Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality above specified thresholds were mandated for referral to the committee in addition to patients referred at the discretion of the surgeon. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to model survival.
RESULTS: A total of 110 consecutive patients were reviewed by the committee. The most common procedure types for referral were isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (47.3%; n = 52) and coronary artery bypass grafting with concomitant aortic valve replacement (19.1%; n = 21). The overall median Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality for referred patients was 5.35% (interquartile range, 4.07%-7.89%). After group discussion, a total of 62 patients were recommended to proceed with surgery (56.4%). Reasons for declining surgery included consensus that an intervention was not indicated (39.6%; n = 19), that an alternative, nonsurgical procedure was recommended (29.2%; n = 14), that there was continued medical management and reevaluation (18.8%; n = 9), and that the patient was deemed at too high a risk for surgery (12.5%; n = 6). Operative mortality in patients proceeding with surgery was 4.6% (n = 2), with an observed-to-expected mortality of 0.86. The 6-month survival after surgery was 92.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a surgeon-based committee to discuss high-risk cases provided a unified voice to referring physicians and facilitated consensus decision-making with acceptable clinical outcomes in a challenging patient cohort.
Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33127404      PMCID: PMC9057451          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  13 in total

1.  The advantages of collegiality.

Authors:  E R Laws
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr

2.  Behavioral Heuristics in Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Andrew R Olenski; André Zimerman; Stephen Coussens; Anupam B Jena
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Rick A Nishimura; Catherine M Otto; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Lee A Fleisher; Hani Jneid; Michael J Mack; Christopher J McLeod; Patrick T O'Gara; Vera H Rigolin; Thoralf M Sundt; Annemarie Thompson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  The heart team of cardiovascular care.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Jeffrey B Rich; William A Zoghbi; Michael J Mack
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Coronary Revascularization in High-Risk Stable Patients With Significant Comorbidities: Challenges in Decision-Making.

Authors:  Joshua Schulman-Marcus; Kellsey Peterson; Riju Banerjee; Sanjay Samy; Neil Yager
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-02-09

6.  2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Volkmar Falk; Jeroen J Bax; Michele De Bonis; Christian Hamm; Per Johan Holm; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Emmanuel Lansac; Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz; Raphael Rosenhek; Johan Sjögren; Pilar Tornos Mas; Alec Vahanian; Thomas Walther; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 2-Statistical Methods and Results.

Authors:  Sean M O'Brien; Liqi Feng; Xia He; Ying Xian; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Vinay Badhwar; Paul A Kurlansky; Anthony P Furnary; Joseph C Cleveland; Kevin W Lobdell; Christina Vassileva; Moritz C Wyler von Ballmoos; Vinod H Thourani; J Scott Rankin; James R Edgerton; Richard S D'Agostino; Nimesh D Desai; Fred H Edwards; David M Shahian
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study.

Authors:  Jonathan Afilalo; Sandra Lauck; Dae H Kim; Thierry Lefèvre; Nicolo Piazza; Kevin Lachapelle; Giuseppe Martucci; Andre Lamy; Marino Labinaz; Mark D Peterson; Rakesh C Arora; Nicolas Noiseux; Andrew Rassi; Igor F Palacios; Philippe Généreux; Brian R Lindman; Anita W Asgar; Caroline A Kim; Amanda Trnkus; José A Morais; Yves Langlois; Lawrence G Rudski; Jean-Francois Morin; Jeffrey J Popma; John G Webb; Louis P Perrault
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  The coronary heart team.

Authors:  Bobby Yanagawa; John D Puskas; Deepak L Bhatt; Subodh Verma
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Influence of experience and the surgical learning curve on long-term patient outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Bryan M Burt; Andrew W ElBardissi; Robert S Huckman; Lawrence H Cohn; Marisa W Cevasco; James D Rawn; Sary F Aranki; John G Byrne
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.