| Literature DB >> 30732137 |
Serge Tonen-Wolyec1,2,3, Salomon Batina-Agasa3, Jean De Dieu Longo4,5, Ralph-Sydney Mboumba Bouassa1,6, Laurent Bélec6.
Abstract
We report on field interpretation of HIV self-testing among female sex workers (FSWs) and non-FSWs living in Democratic Republic of the Congo.Two hundred and eight participants [76 (36.5%) FSWs; 132 (63.5%) non-FSWs] were enrolled in Kisangani and Bunia to evaluate their ability to read and interpret the results of a prototype HIV self-test (Exacto Test HIV, Biosynex, Strasbourg, France), according to WHO recommendations. Thirteen standardized tests (6 positive, 5 negative, 2 invalid) were proposed after successive random selection.Two thousand seven hundred and four standardized tests (1248 positive, 1040 negative, 416 invalid) were interpreted; 2435 (90.1%) were correctly interpreted, whereas 269 (9.9%) were misinterpreted. In FSWs and non-FSWs, the test results were similarly correctly interpreted in 87.4% (864/988) and 91.6% (1571/1716), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the variable "educational level" remained strongly associated with the interpretation of positive, negative, and invalid HIV self-test results, but not the variables "commercial sex work" and "language chosen for instructions for use." Incorrect interpretation was significantly higher in participants with insufficient educational level than in those with sufficient education level for positive (13.1% vs 2.6%; adjusted OR: 4.5), negative (22.3% vs 2.6%; adjusted OR: 5.3), and invalid test results (23.8% v 6.4%; adjusted OR: 3.6).Incorrect interpretation of HIV self-test was as common in FSWs and non-FSWs. The lower was the educational level, the greater was the difficulty to interpret results correctly. These observations point that insufficient education level, rather than commercial sex work by itself, constitutes a key factor of incorrect interpretation of HIV self-test.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30732137 PMCID: PMC6380737 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Flow charts showing the ability of participants to read and interpret (correctly or incorrectly) the 2704 standardized results of the Exacto Test HIV (Biosynex) obtained from successive random selection of a panel of 13 standardized tests, including 6 positive, 5 negative, and 2 invalid, including 988 by 76 female sew workers (FSWs) [A], and 1716 by 132 non-FSWs [C], and percentages of misinterpreted self-tests results by FSWs [B], and non-FSWs [D]. The heights of the vertical bars indicate the overall percentages of misinterpreted HIV self-test's results; the color-coded components of the bars indicated the type of misinterpretation: HIV-positive (black); HIV negative (white); invalid (gray).
Bivariate and multivariate regression analysis of factors associated with incorrect interpretation of positive, negative, and invalid HIV self-test results among the 2704 results of the Exacto Test HIV (Biosynex) obtained from successive random selection of a panel of 13 standardized tests, including 6 positive, 4 negative, and 2 invalid by 208 adult female participants including 76 FSW and 132 non-FSW.
Figure 2Inverse correlation between the education level and percentage of misinterpretation of results among FSW and non-FSW. Percentages of misinterpretation of test results were higher among FSWs with insufficient educational level as compared to those with sufficient educational level for positive (4.3% vs 0.4%, P = .005), negative (28.3% vs 3.3%, P < .001), and invalid (41.3% vs 6.7%, P < .001) test results. Percentages of misinterpretation of test results were higher among non-FSWs with insufficient educational level as compared to those with sufficient educational level for positive (23% vs 0%, P < .001), negative (23% vs 0%, P < .001), and invalid (20.3% vs 0%; P < .001) test results.