| Literature DB >> 29092678 |
Jean De Dieu Longo1, Marcel Mbéko Simaléko1, Richard Ngbale2, Gérard Grésenguet1, Gilles Brücker3, Laurent Bélec4.
Abstract
Classification of professional and non-professional female sex workers (FSWs) into different categories, never previously reported in the Central African Republic (CAR), may be useful to assess the dynamics of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, design operational intervention programmes to combat HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and to adapt these programmes to the broad spectrum of sexual transactions in the CAR. Our study proposes a socio-behavioural classification of FSWs living in the CAR and engaged in transactional and commercial sex. Thus, the aims of the study were these: (i) to categorize FSWs according to socio-anthropologic criteria in Bangui and (ii) to examine the association between a selection of demographic and risk variables with the different categories of female sex work as an outcome. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in 2013 to describe the spectrum of commercial sex work (CSW) in Bangui among 345 sexually active women having more than 2 sexual partners, other than their regular partner, during the prior 3 months and reporting to have received money or gifts in return for their sexual relationships. According to socio-behavioural characteristics, FSWs were classified into six different categories. Professional FSWs, constituting 32.5% of the interviewed women, were divided in two categories: pupulenge (13.9%), i.e., dragonflies (sometimes called gba moundjou, meaning literally look at the White) consisting of roamers, who travel around the city to hotels and nightclubs seeking wealthy clients, with a preference for French men; and the category of kata (18.6%), i.e., FSWs working in poor neighbourhoods. Non-professional FSWs, constituting 67.5% of the interviewed women, were divided into four categories: street and market vendors (20.8%), students (19.1%), housewives (15.7%) and unskilled civil servants (11.9%). In general, CSW in the CAR presents a remarkably heterogeneous phenomenon. Risk-taking behaviour regarding STI/HIV infection appears to be different according to the different categories of female CSW. The groups of katas and street vendors were poorer and less educated, consumed more alcohol or other psycho-active substances (cannabis, tramadol and glue) and, consequently, were more exposed to STI. Our results emphasise the high level of vulnerability of both poor professional FSWs (kata) and non-professional sex workers, especially street vendors, who should be taken into account when designing prevention programmes targeting this population for STI/HIV control purposes.Entities:
Keywords: Central African Republic; Facteur de risque; Programmes de prévention; Républiuqe Centrafricaine; Travailleuse du sexe; Typologie; classification; female sex workers; prevention programmes; risk factor
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29092678 PMCID: PMC5678296 DOI: 10.1080/17290376.2017.1394907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SAHARA J ISSN: 1729-0376
Fig. 1.Map showing the location of inclusion study sites in Bangui, including 13 secondary schools and university attendance sites (blue round), 4 dancing places (Sango and Plantation nights clubs downtown; Tangawishi and Borsalmino dancings at periphery) (green round, and 4 other emplacements notoriously known as couples’ meeting places, such as the French military area near the airport (yellow round).
Fig. 2.Flow diagram showing enrolment, inclusion and data analysis for the study. A total of 2512 women attending 21 areas of couples’ meeting places, including 13 secondary schools and university places, were sensitized to the study purposes and proposed to attend the ‘Centre National de Référence des Maladies Sexuellement Transmissibles et du SIDA’ (CNRMST/SIDA), the main clinic for sexually transmitted infections in Bangui; 1384 (55.1%) of them thereafter voluntarily consulted with the CNRMST/SIDA for participating to the study; 357 (35.7%) sexually active women declared having more than 2 sexual partners, other than their regular partner, during the prior 3 months and having received money as their job or gifts in return for their sexual relationships (exclusive of a job), and were included as female sex workers (FSWs) for answering a face-to-face, structured sociodemographic and behavioural questionnaire. The group of professional FSWs included women declaring paid sex as their principal sources of income, and the other women who practiced occasional paid sex and had not declared themselves as FSWs were classified as non-professional or clandestine FSWs.
Characteristics of 345 included women practicing paid sex and living in Bangui.
| Category of female sex workers | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional ( | Nonprofessional ( | ||||||
| Seller ( | Student ( | Housewife ( | Civil servant ( | ||||
| Median (years) | 21 | 20 | 25 | 20 | 27 | 27 | |
| Range | [16–29] | [14–36] | [14–38] | [16–28] | [18–46] | [22–47] | – |
| Less than 18-year-old (%) | 21 | 14 | 14 | 17 | 2 | 0 | |
| Central African Republic | 39 (81%) | 50 (78%) | 68 (94%) | 62 (94%) | 51 (94%) | 41 (100%) | |
| Democratic Republic of Congo | 6 (13%) | 8 (13%) | 2 (3%) | 2 (3%) | 2 (4%) | 0 (0%) | NS |
| Other | 3 (6%) | 6 (9%) | 2 (3%) | 2 (3%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Illiterate | 0 (0%) | 37 (58%) | 32 (44%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (11%) | 0 (0%) | <0.05 |
| Secondary level | 39 (81%) | 23 (36%) | 31 (43%) | 30 (46%) | 27 (50%) | 1 (2%) | |
| Superior level | 9 (19%) | 4 (6%) | 9 (13%) | 36 (55%) | 21 (39%) | 40 (98%) | |
| Unmarried | 45 (94%) | 64 (100%) | 59 (82%) | 54 (82%) | 22 (41%) | 20 (49%) | <0.05 |
| Married | 03 (6%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (18%) | 12 (18%) | 32 (59%) | 21 (51%) | |
| 0 | 22 (46%) | 44 (69%) | 15 (21%) | 42 (64%) | 4 (7%) | 4 (10%) | <0.05 |
| 1–2 | 26 (54%) | 20 (31%) | 52 (72%) | 24 (36%) | 35 (65%) | 33 (80%) | |
| More than 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (28%) | 4 (10%) | |
| Weak | 3 (6%) | 14(22%) | 45 (63%) | 1 (2%) | 9 (17%) | 2 (5%) | <0.05 |
| Middle | 8 (17%) | 21 (33%) | 18 (25%) | 5 (7%) | 9 (17%) | 3 (7%) | |
| Satisfactory | 37 (77%) | 29 (45%) | 9 (12%) | 60 (91%) | 36 (66%) | 36 (88%) | |
| Yes | 40 (83%) | 24 (37%) | 12 (17%) | 35 (53%) | 30 (56%) | 13 (32%) | <0.05 |
| No | 8 (17%) | 40 (63%) | 60 (83%) | 31 (47%) | 24 (44%) | 28 (68%) | |
| Yes | 36 (75%) | 13 (20%) | 20 (28%) | 44 (67%) | 24 (44%) | 25 (61%) | <0.05 |
| No | 12 (25%) | 51 (80%) | 52 (72%) | 22 (33%) | 30 (56%) | 16 (39%) | |
| Yes | 9 (18%) | 24 (38%) | 31 (43%) | 10 (15%) | 15 (28%) | 6 (15%) | <0.05 |
| No | 39 (81%) | 40 (62%) | 41 (57%) | 56 (85%) | 39 (72%) | 35 (85%) | |
| 10–15 years | 27 (56%) | 43 (67%) | 39 (54%) | 26 (39%) | 27 (50%) | 13 (32%) | <0.05 |
| 16–20 years | 21 (44%) | 21 (33%) | 33 (46%) | 40 (61%) | 27 (50%) | 28 (68 %) | |
| <1 year | 8 (17%) | 13 (20%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 2–5 years | 23(48%) | 43 (67%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| >5 years | 17(35%) | 8 (12%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| No or rarely | 12 (25%) | 60 (94%) | 61 (85%) | 30 (45%) | 40 (74%) | 18 (44%) | <0.05 |
| Always | 36 (75%) | 4 (6%) | 11 (15%) | 36 (56%) | 14 (26%) | 23 (56%) | |
| No or rarely | 0 (0%) | 40 (62%) | 48 (67%) | 12 (18%) | 29 (54%) | 11 (27%) | <0.05 |
| Always | 48 (100%) | 24 (38%) | 24 (33%) | 54 (82%) | 25 (46%) | 30 (73%) | |
| No or 1 fold per week | 43 (90%) | 8 (13%) | 37 (51%) | 50 (76%) | 27 (50%) | 33 (80%) | <0.05 |
| Every day | 5 (10%) | 56 (87%) | 35 (49%) | 16 (24%) | 27 (50%) | 8 (20%) | |
| No or 1 fold per week | 47 (98%) | 55 (86%) | 71 (99%) | 66 (100%) | 54 (100%) | 41 (100%) | <0.05 |
| Every day | 1 (2%) | 9 (14%) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| No or 1 per week | 48 (100%) | 53 (83%) | 72 (100%) | 65 (98%) | 54 (100%) | 41 (100%) | <0.05 |
| Every day | 0 (0%) | 11 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Notes: STI: Sexually transmitted infection; NA: Not attributable; NS: Not significant.
*χ 2 test; P < .05 is considered as significant.
Principal similarities and differences characterizing the two main categories of female sex workers (FSW) living in Bangui, the capital city of the Central African Republic, according to recognition regarding having had paid sex during the last three months in order to obtain economic compensation with more than three sexual partners.
| Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Self-declared FSW | Clandestine FSW | |
| Similarities | Same proportion of known past history of sexually transmitted infections Knowledge of HIV serological status Negotiation capabilities during paid sex | |
| Differences | Professional Principal source of income Median age: 21 years 20% foreigner Generally well educated (except the ‘kata’) Young entry in sexuality Satisfactory knowledge on HIV/AIDS with high perception of high risk for HIV Frequent regular alcohol or psycho-active substances consumption | Nonprofessional Secondary source of income Median age: 25 years Rarely foreigner (90% from CAR) Poorly educated (in particular the ‘vendors’) Entry in sexuality near the age of majority Frequent erroneous knowledge on AIDS with low perception of risk for HIV Infrequent alcohol or psycho-active substance consumption |
Principal similarities and differences characterizing the so-called ‘pupulengue’ and ‘kata’ subgroups of professional female sex workers living in Bangui.
| Subgroups | ||
|---|---|---|
| ‘Pupulengue’ | ‘Kata’ | |
| Similarities | Self-declared prostitutes Originating from the CAR Unmarried or ‘free girl’ No or few children Same proportion of known past history of sexually transmitted infections Similar age of entry in sexuality Similar duration of prostitution | |
| Differences | Work exclusively downtown Preference for White men or foreigners Median age : 21 years Well educated >50%: 1–2 children High perception of high risk for HIV Frequent knowledge of HIV status High level of self-protection during paid sex Strong negotiation capabilities during paid sex Occasional alcohol consumption Infrequent psycho-active substances consumption | Work in poor suburbs of Bangui Clients usually Black men without preference on their nationalities (men from CAR as well as foreigners) Median age: 20 years Poorly educated #70%: no child Low perception of risk for HIV Infrequent knowledge of HIV status Low level of self-protection during paid sex Weak negotiation capabilities during paid sex Daily alcohol consumption Frequent psycho-active substances consumption |
Principal similarities and differences characterizing the four main subgroups of nonprofessional, clandestine female sex workers living in Bangui.
| Subgroups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seller | Schoolgirl/student | Housewife | Civil servant | |
| Similarities | Occasional paid sex as secondary source of income in women not feeling themselves as prostitutes Originating from the CAR Similar age of entry in sexuality No consumption of psycho-active substances | |||
| Differences | Median age : 25 years Poor educated Generally single #70%: 1–2 children Poor knowledge on HIV Low perception of HIV risk Infrequent knowledge of HIV status Frequent past history of STI Rarely condom use #50%: alcohol | Median age : 20 years Well educated Generally single >60%: no child Good knowledge on HIV Good perception of HIV risk Frequent knowledge of HIV status Infrequent past history of STI Frequent condom use #25%: alcohol | Median age : 27 years Well educated Generally married #90%: 1–3 children Good knowledge on HIV Good perception of HIV risk Middle knowledge of HIV status Frequent past history of STI Infrequent condom use 50%: alcohol | Median age : 27 years Highly educated Generally married #80%: 1–2 children Good knowledge on HIV Middle perception of HIV risk Frequent knowledge of HIV status Infrequent past history of STI Frequent condom use 20%: alcohol |