| Literature DB >> 30728029 |
Johanna Wiik1,2, Verena Sengpiel3, Maria Kyrgiou4,5, Staffan Nilsson6,7, Anita Mitra4,5, Tom Tanbo8, Christine Monceyron Jonassen9, Tone Møller Tannæs10, Katrine Sjøborg11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) by Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) has been correlated with reproductive morbidity, while the cervicovaginal microbiota is also known to affect the risk of preterm delivery. CIN and treatment by LEEP might change the cervical microbiota. The main aim of this study was to describe the cervical microbiota before and after LEEP and assess its associaton with cone depth and HPV persistence. Further, we aimed to compare the microbiota to references with normal cervical cytology.Entities:
Keywords: CIN; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia; HPV; Human papillomavirus; LEEP; Lactobacillus; Vaginal microbiota
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30728029 PMCID: PMC6364458 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0727-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Fig. 1Flowchart of formation of the study groups and follow up
Characteristics of participants by groups
| Characteristics | LEEP group | Reference group | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years median (IQR) | 36 (31-42) | 47 (38-56) | <0.0011 | ||
| n | % | n | % | ||
| Age < 46 years | 75 | 84 | 48 | 48 | <0.0012 |
| Smoking | <0.0012 | ||||
| None | 48 | 54 | 82 | 83 | |
| 1-10 / day | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| >10 / day | 33 | 37 | 9 | 9 | |
| Unknown | 0 | 1 | |||
| Contraceptive use | <0.0012 | ||||
| None | 39 | 44 | 73 | 73 | |
| Hormonal IUD | 20 | 22 | 14 | 14 | |
| Copper IUD | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | |
| Contraceptive pills/plaster | 17 | 19 | 3 | 3 | |
| Condom | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Vaginal Hormonal Ring | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Gestagen injection | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Sterilisation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Hormonal contraceptive | 40 | 45 | 19 | 19 | <0.0012 |
| Marital status | <0.0012 | ||||
| Married/cohabiting | 49 | 55 | 79 | 79 | |
| Single/living alone | 40 | 45 | 21 | 21 | |
| Education | 0.092 | ||||
| 9-14 years of education | 60 | 68 | 56 | 56 | |
| >14 years of education | 28 | 32 | 44 | 44 | |
| Unknown | 1 | 0 | |||
1Independent t-test
2Chisquare test
Abbreviations IUD intrauterine device, LEEP Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure, n number
The cervical microbiota in the LEEP group and Reference group, before and after treatment
| LEEP group | 6 m follow-up LEEP group | 12 m follow-up LEEP group | Reference group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % |
| 7 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 9 |
|
| 28 | 32 | 21 | 27 | 20 | 28 | 9 | 9 |
|
| 17 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 8 | 11 | 3 | 3 |
| 12 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 10 | |
|
| 41 | 46 | 25 | 32 | 26 | 36 | 16 | 16 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 36 | 36 | 47 | 39 | 54 | 39 | 39 | |
| any non- | 59 | 66 | 44 | 57 | 39 | 54 | 41 | 41 |
Abbreviations: LEEP Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure, m months, M mycoplasma, N numbers
The cervical microbiota six and 12 months after LEEP compared to before LEEP
| 6 months after LEEP ( | 12 months after LEEP ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | Pos- > Neg | Neg.- > Pos | p1 | Pos- > Neg | Neg- > Pos | p1 |
| 5 | 1 | 0.22 | 5 | 3 | 0.73 | |
|
| 2 | 1 | 1,00 | 3 | 1 | 0.63 |
|
| 8 | 8 | 1.00 | 7 | 7 | 1.00 |
|
| 5 | 1 | 0.22 | 5 | 2 | 0.45 |
| 8 | 1 | 0.04 | 8 | 3 | 0.23 | |
|
| 15 | 5 | 0.04 | 10 | 5 | 0.30 |
|
| 5 | 1 | 0.22 | 5 | 3 | 0.73 |
| 12 | 17 | 0.46 | 8 | 18 | 0.08 | |
1Mc Nemar test
Abbreviations; LEEP Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure, N numbers, neg negative, pos positive
HPV status and cervical microbiota after LEEP
| 6 months after LEEP, ( | 12 months after LEEP, ( | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPV-DNA pos | HPV–DNA neg | HPV-DNA pos | HPV–DNA neg | |||||||
| Bacteria | Pos Bact | Pos Bact | p1 | Pos Bact | Pos Bact | p1 | ||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |||
| 13 | 54 | 23 | 43 | 0.46 | 12 | 50 | 27 | 56 | 0.63 | |
| any non- | 14 | 58 | 30 | 57 | 1.00 | 13 | 54 | 26 | 54 | 1.00 |
1Fisher’s exact test
Abbreviations; bact bacteria, DNA DeoxyriboNucleic Acid, HPV Human Papilloma Virus, LEEP Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure, N numbers, neg negative, pos positive
Fig. 2Number of non-Lactobacillus bacteria identified in culture or PCR (range: 0–5) for women planned for LEEP as opposed to references. a) All women b) Women aged <46 years
The cervical microbiota in the LEEP group and the Reference group
| LEEP | Reference group | Unadjusted1 | Adjusted2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | n | % | n | % | OR | CI | p | OR | CI | p |
| 7 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.005 |
| 0.008 | |||
|
| 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3.5 | 0.4–33.8 | 0.34 | 2.3 | 0.2–26.0 | 0.52 |
|
| 4 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0.5 | 0.1–1.6 | 0.26 | 0.3 | 0.1–1.4 | 0.12 |
|
| 28 | 32 | 9 | 9 | 4.6 | 2.1–10.5 | <.001 | 3.5 | 1.4–9.0 | 0.009 |
|
| 17 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 7.6 | 2.2–27.0 | 0.001 | 2.4 | 0.6–9.5 | 0.21 |
| 12 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 1.4 | 0.6–3.4 | 0.50 | 1.9 | 0.7–5.5 | 0.24 | |
|
| 41 | 46 | 16 | 16 | 4.5 | 2.3–8.8 | <.001 | 3.9 | 1.6–9.3 | 0.002 |
|
| 9 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 3.6 | 1.0–13.9 | 0.07 | 2.2 | 0.5–10.5 | 0.32 |
| 32 | 36 | 39 | 39 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.6 | 0.76 | 0.8 | 0.4–1.7 | 0.58 | |
| any non- | 59 | 66 | 41 | 41 | 2.8 | 1.6–5.1 | 0.001 | 2.2 | 1.1–4.5 | 0.03 |
1Fisher’s exact test
2Logistic regression adjusted for Marital status, Hormonal Contraceptive Use, Smoking and Age. 188 cases analysed, 1 missing case in the reference group because of missing data on smoking
Abbreviations; CI Confidence Interval, LEEP Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure, N numbers, OR Odds Ratio