Laura M Chambers1, Parker Bussies2, Roberto Vargas3,4, Emily Esakov5, Surabhi Tewari5,6, Ofer Reizes4,5, Chad Michener3,4. 1. Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk A81, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. chambel2@ccf.org. 2. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk A81, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. 3. Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk A81, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. 4. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. 6. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review the emerging evidence regarding the relationship between the microbiota of the gastrointestinal and female reproductive tracts and gynecologic cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: The microbiome has essential roles in maintaining health. In recent years, the microbiota of the gastrointestinal and female reproductive tracts have been linked to many diseases, including gynecologic cancer. Alterations to the bacterial populations in a microbiota, or dysbiosis, have been shown to favor a pro-carcinogenic state through altered immune responses, dysregulated hormone metabolism, and modulation of the cell cycle. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have emerged, demonstrating that specific bacteria or microbial communities may be associated with increased risk for uterine, ovarian, and cervical cancers. Notably, numerous studies have linked a non-Lactobacillus-dominant vaginal microbiota, composed of anaerobic bacteria, with HPV infection, persistence, and development of invasive cervical cancer. Similarly, next-generation high-throughput sequencing techniques have enabled the characterization of unique microbiotas in patients with malignant and benign gynecologic conditions, shedding light on new associations between bacterial species and gynecologic cancers. Harnessing the power of the microbiome for early diagnosis, therapeutic intervention and modulation creates tremendous potential to optimize gynecologic cancer outcomes in the future.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review the emerging evidence regarding the relationship between the microbiota of the gastrointestinal and female reproductive tracts and gynecologic cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: The microbiome has essential roles in maintaining health. In recent years, the microbiota of the gastrointestinal and female reproductive tracts have been linked to many diseases, including gynecologic cancer. Alterations to the bacterial populations in a microbiota, or dysbiosis, have been shown to favor a pro-carcinogenic state through altered immune responses, dysregulated hormone metabolism, and modulation of the cell cycle. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have emerged, demonstrating that specific bacteria or microbial communities may be associated with increased risk for uterine, ovarian, and cervical cancers. Notably, numerous studies have linked a non-Lactobacillus-dominant vaginal microbiota, composed of anaerobic bacteria, with HPV infection, persistence, and development of invasive cervical cancer. Similarly, next-generation high-throughput sequencing techniques have enabled the characterization of unique microbiotas in patients with malignant and benign gynecologic conditions, shedding light on new associations between bacterial species and gynecologic cancers. Harnessing the power of the microbiome for early diagnosis, therapeutic intervention and modulation creates tremendous potential to optimize gynecologic cancer outcomes in the future.
Authors: Jacques Ravel; Pawel Gajer; Zaid Abdo; G Maria Schneider; Sara S K Koenig; Stacey L McCulle; Shara Karlebach; Reshma Gorle; Jennifer Russell; Carol O Tacket; Rebecca M Brotman; Catherine C Davis; Kevin Ault; Ligia Peralta; Larry J Forney Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Steven R Gill; Mihai Pop; Robert T Deboy; Paul B Eckburg; Peter J Turnbaugh; Buck S Samuel; Jeffrey I Gordon; David A Relman; Claire M Fraser-Liggett; Karen E Nelson Journal: Science Date: 2006-06-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Marina R S Walther-António; Jun Chen; Francesco Multinu; Alexis Hokenstad; Tammy J Distad; E Heidi Cheek; Gary L Keeney; Douglas J Creedon; Heidi Nelson; Andrea Mariani; Nicholas Chia Journal: Genome Med Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Sagarika Banerjee; Tian Tian; Zhi Wei; Natalie Shih; Michael D Feldman; James C Alwine; George Coukos; Erle S Robertson Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-05-30
Authors: Jack A Gilbert; Martin J Blaser; J Gregory Caporaso; Janet K Jansson; Susan V Lynch; Rob Knight Journal: Nat Med Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 53.440