Literature DB >> 17486463

Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study.

Katrine Donvold Sjøborg1, Ingvild Vistad, Siv S Myhr, Rune Svenningsen, Christine Herzog, Arild Kloster-Jensen, Gunhild Nygård, Sølvi Hole, Tom Tanbo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of cervical laser conisation (CLC) or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) on the outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Methods. Multi-centre, retrospective, case-control study, which included a cohort of 742 women, who, after treatment with LEEP or CLC, gave birth or suffered second trimester miscarriage. Control women (n=742) were extracted from the respective hospital birth registries and matched by age and parity. Outcome measures were perinatal mortality, length of gestation, birth weight and preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in perinatal mortality among women treated with LCL or LEEP compared to controls, 6/742 versus 2/742: odds ratio (OR)=3.1 (95% CI: 0.6-15.2). Excluding second trimester miscarriages, ORs for giving birth before week 37, 32 and 28 after conisation compared to the controls were 3.4 (95% CI: 2.3-5.1), 4.6 (95% CI: 1.7-12.5), and 12.4 (95% CI: 1.6-96.1), respectively, after adjusting for smoking habits during pregnancy, marital status and educational level. Adjusted ORs of birth weight <2,500, <1,500 and <1,000 g after conisation compared to controls were 3.9 (95% CI: 2.4-6.3), 4.4 (95% CI: 1.5-13.6), and 10.4 (95% CI: 1.3-82.2), respectively. The adjusted OR for pPROM was 10.5 (95% CI: 3.7-29.5).
CONCLUSION: Treatment by CLC and LEEP increases the risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight and pPROM in subsequent pregnancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17486463     DOI: 10.1080/11038120701208158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  19 in total

1.  Clinical significance of early (< 20 weeks) vs. late (20-24 weeks) detection of sonographic short cervix in asymptomatic women in the mid-trimester.

Authors:  E Vaisbuch; R Romero; O Erez; J P Kusanovic; S Mazaki-Tovi; F Gotsch; V Romero; C Ward; T Chaiworapongsa; P Mittal; Y Sorokin; S S Hassan
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Lessons from practice: risk of CIN 3 or cancer associated with an LSIL or HPV-positive ASC-US screening result in women aged 21 to 24.

Authors:  Gaea Moore; Barbara Fetterman; J Thomas Cox; Nancy Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Walter Kinney; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Screening with Papanicolaou tests in Alberta: Are we Choosing Wisely?

Authors:  Christopher J Symonds; Wenxin Chen; Marianne Sarah Rose; Lara J Cooke
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Cervical Conization and the Risk of Preterm Birth: A Population-Based Multicentric Trial of Turkish Cohort.

Authors:  Ali Galip Zebitay; Emre Sinan Güngör; Gülsah Ilhan; Orkun Çetin; Cem Dane; Canan Furtuna; Fatma Ferda Verit Atmaca; Merve Tuna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

5.  Triage of women with minor cervical lesions: data suggesting a "test and treat" approach for HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing.

Authors:  Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye; Silje Fismen; Tore Gutteberg; Elin Synnøve Mortensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  A phase I trial of a human papillomavirus DNA vaccine for HPV16+ cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3.

Authors:  Cornelia L Trimble; Shiwen Peng; Ferdynand Kos; Patti Gravitt; Raphael Viscidi; Elizabeth Sugar; Drew Pardoll; T C Wu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing is more specific than cytology in post-colposcopy follow-up of women with negative cervical biopsy.

Authors:  Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye; Marc Arbyn; Silje Fismen; Tore Jarl Gutteberg; Elin Synnøve Mortensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Susanne Albrechtsen; Svein Rasmussen; Steinar Thoresen; Lorentz M Irgens; Ole Erik Iversen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-18

Review 10.  Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Anita Mitra; Marc Arbyn; Maria Paraskevaidi; Antonios Athanasiou; Pierre P L Martin-Hirsch; Phillip Bennett; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.