| Literature DB >> 35252846 |
Kimberly S McKee1, Kayla A Carter2, Christine Bassis3, Vincent B Young3, Barbara Reed1, Diane M Harper1,2, Mack T Ruffin4, Jason D Bell5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between the vaginal microbiota, high-risk human papillomavirus infection, and abnormal cervical cytology has not been well characterized. Our objective was to characterize the vaginal microbiota in a stratified random sample of women from a population-based study in Appalachia.Entities:
Keywords: Vaginal microbiota; cervical cytology; high-risk human papillomavirus infection
Year: 2020 PMID: 35252846 PMCID: PMC8896808 DOI: 10.21037/gpm-20-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gynecol Pelvic Med ISSN: 2617-4499
Subject characteristics by health status
| Characteristics | Entire population (N=308) | Abnormal cervical cytology (N=109), (35.4%) | HR HPV+ (N=110), (35.7%) | NILM/HPV− (N=89), (28.9%) | P[ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median [IQR] | 26 [21–39] | 24 [21–34] | 24 [21–34] | 35 [25–48] | <0.001 |
| Race/ethnicity, N (%) | |||||
| White | 291 (94.5) | 105 (96.3) | 103 (93.6) | 83 (93.3) | 0.22 |
| Black or African American | 6 (1.9) | 0 (0) | 4 (3.6) | 2 (2.2) | |
| American Indian or Alaskan Native | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Asian | 5 (1.6) | 3 (2.8) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (1.1) | |
| Hispanic | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.64 |
| Completed high school, N (%) | 271 (88.0) | 97 (89.0) | 96 (87.3) | 78 (87.6) | 0.95 |
| Smoking, N (%) | |||||
| Smoked ≥100 lifetime cigarettes | 188 (61.0) | 73 (67.0) | 71 (64.5) | 44 (49.4) | 0.06 |
| Current smoker | 143 (46.4) | 59 (54.1) | 57 (51.8) | 27 (30.3) | 0.01 |
| Alcohol consumption, N (%) | |||||
| Light/moderate | 108 (35.1) | 37 (33.9) | 38 (34.5) | 33 (37.1) | 0.08 |
| Heavy | 92 (29.9) | 41 (37.6) | 34 (30.9) | 17 (19.1) | |
| Married, N (%) | 86 (27.9) | 24 (22.0) | 23 (20.9) | 39 (43.8) | <0.001 |
| 2+ male partners in last year, N (%) | 92 (29.9) | 45 (41.3) | 37 (33.6) | 10 (11.2) | <0.001 |
| Contraception, N (%) | |||||
| History of hormonal method or copper IUD[ | 275 (89.3) | 102 (93.6) | 101 (91.8) | 72 (80.9) | 0.04 |
| History of non-hormonal method[ | 122 (39.6) | 45 (41.3) | 39 (35.5) | 38 (42.7) | 0.42 |
| Occasional current condom use | 64 (20.8) | 28 (25.7) | 25 (22.7) | 11 (12.4) | 0.02 |
| Regular current condom use | 52 (16.9) | 17 (15.6) | 23 (20.9) | 12 (13.5) | |
| Menopause, N (%) | 33 (10.7) | 8 (7.3) | 8 (7.3) | 17 (19.1) | 0.01 |
| HPV-related history, N (%) | |||||
| History of abnormal pap | 146 (47.4) | 64 (58.7) | 52 (47.3) | 30 (33.7) | 0.001 |
| History of warts, condyloma, or HPV | 41 (13.3) | 19 (17.4) | 17 (15.5) | 5 (5.6) | 0.05 |
| Vaginal microbiota, N (%) | |||||
| CST 1– | 56 (18.2) | 19 (17.4) | 21 (19.1) | 16 (18.0) | 0.04 |
| CST 2– | 116 (37.7) | 35 (32.1) | 36 (32.7) | 45 (50.6) | |
| CST 3–Diverse | 136 (44.2) | 55 (50.5) | 53 (48.2) | 28 (31.5) | |
| | 205 (66.6) | 74 (67.9) | 62 (56.4) | 69 (77.5) | 0.01 |
, Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVAs were used to compare continuous variables between women with abnormal cervical cytology, women with HR-HPV+, and women with NILM/HPV−. Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare race and Hispanic between women with abnormal cervical cytology, women with HR-HPV, and women with NILM/HPV−. Chi squared tests were used to compare all other categorical variables between women with abnormal cervical cytology, women with HR-HPV+, and women with NILM/HPV− screens.
, Methods included contraceptive pill, patch, injections, vaginal ring, and hormonal IUD.
, Methods included contraceptive sponge, diaphragm, spermicide, withdrawal, and natural family planning.
, indicates significance at P<0.05 level.
N, number; HR HPV+, high risk human papillomavirus; IQR, interquartile range; IUD, intrauterine device; pap, pap smear; HPV, human papillomavirus; CST community state type.
Figure 1Mean relative abundances of major operational taxonomic units (OTU) by community state type (CST) (N=308).
Figure 2Major taxa relative abundances by outcome: abnormal cervical cytology regardless of any HPV infection (CC), HR HPV+ infection only without cytologic abnormality (HPV+), and women without cytologic abnormalities (negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy) or HPV infection (NILM/HPV−) (N=308).
Figure 3Shannon diversity comparing abnormal cervical cytology regardless of any HPV infection (CC), HR HPV+ infection only without cytologic abnormality (HPV+), and women without cytologic abnormalities (negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy) or HPV infection (NILM/HPV−) (N=308) which indicated alpha diversity was not significantly different across outcome groups.
Figure 4Inverse Simpson diversity comparing abnormal cervical cytology regardless of any HPV infection (CC), HR HPV+ infection only without cytologic abnormality (HPV+), and women without cytologic abnormalities (negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy) or HPV infection (NILM/HPV−) (N=308) which indicated alpha diversity was not significantly different across outcome groups.
Figure 5Ordination plots using θYC distances indicate dissimilarity in the vaginal microbiota community abnormal cytology v HR HPV+, abnormal cytology v NILM/HPV−, and HR HPV+ v NILM/HPV−, respectively (N=308). Differences in beta diversity were detected using AMOVA on θYC distances overall across the three outcomes (P=0.04) as well as between abnormal cytology and NILM/HPV (P=0.02) and between HR HPV+ and NILM/HPV− (P=0.017).
Crude and adjusted models predicting abnormal cervical cytology or HR HPV infection by CST and health factors
| Variable | Crude (N=308) | Adjusted (N=284) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abnormal cervical cytology[ | HR HPV+[ | Abnormal cervical cytology[ | HR HPV+[ | |||||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Age | – | – | – | – | 0.96 | 0.94–0.99 | 0.96 | 0.93–0.98 |
| Community state type | ||||||||
| CST 1, | Referent | Referent | ||||||
| CST 2, | 0.65 | 0.29–1.46 | 0.61 | 0.28–1.34 | 0.67 | 0.28–1.59 | 0.67 | 0.29–1.57 |
| CST 3, diverse | 1.65 | 0.74–3.70 | 1.44 | 0.65–3.20 | 1.63 | 0.66–4.03 | 1.53 | 0.62–3.76 |
| Race | ||||||||
| African American/American Indian/Alaskan Native/Asian | Referent | Referent | ||||||
| White race | – | – | – | – | 1.08 | 0.15–7.53 | 0.83 | 0.13–5.26 |
| Tobacco status | ||||||||
| Non smoker | Referent | Referent | ||||||
| Current smoker | – | – | – | – | 1.75 | 0.89–3.46 | 1.69 | 0.69–4.16 |
| Sexual partners | ||||||||
| 1 or fewer male partners in last year | Referent | Referent | ||||||
| 2+ male partners in last year | – | – | – | – | 3.17 | 1.30–7.74 | 2.34 | 0.84–6.52 |
, reference group was NILM/HPV− women.
, indicates significance at P<0.05.
N, number, abnormal cervical cytology; HR HPV, high risk human papillomavirus; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CST, community state type.
Crude and adjusted models of the association between L. gassseri presence and health status
| Variable | Univariate (N=308) | Multivariate (N=257) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abnormal cervical cytology[ | HR HPV+[ | Abnormal cervical cytology[ | HR HPV+[ | |||||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| 0.61 | 0.32–1.16 | 0.37 | 0.20–0.70 | 0.88 | 0.42–1.83 | 0.50 | 0.25–1.02 | |
| Age | – | – | – | – | 0.97 | 0.94–1.00 | 0.97 | 0.94–1.00 |
| White race[ | – | – | – | – | 0.70 | 0.07–7.42 | 0.63 | 0.06–6.24 |
| Current smoker[ | – | – | – | – | 1.96 | 1.00–3.87 | 2.03 | 1.03–4.01 |
| 2+ male partners in last year[ | – | – | – | – | 3.77 | 1.56–9.09 | 2.46 | 1.01–6.02 |
| Current condom use (ordinal)[ | – | – | – | – | 0.88 | 0.62–1.24 | 0.69 | 0.49–0.96 |
, reference was NILM/HPV− women.
, reference was absence of L. gasseri.
, reference group was black or African American, American Indian or Alaskan Native, and Asian subjects.
, reference group was current non-smokers.
, reference group was subjects with one or fewer male partners in the last year.
, levels from low to high were: no current partner (reference level), regular current condom use, occasional current condom use, no current condom use.
, indicates significance at P<0.05.
N, number; HR HPV, high risk human papillomavirus; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; pap, pap smear.