| Literature DB >> 30719446 |
Iwona Sulowska1, Anna Mika1, Łukasz Oleksy1,2, Artur Stolarczyk3.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of plantar short foot muscles exercises on the performance of lower extremities in long-distance runners. 47 long-distance runners aged 21-45 years took part in this study. The participants were divided into two groups based on baseline measurement of Foot Posture Index: Group 1 (n=27) with neutral foot and Group 2 (n=20) with slight and increased pronation. The participants performed the exercises daily for 6 weeks. The knee flexors and extensors torque, work, and power on Isokinetic Dynamometer and Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) were checked at baseline and after 6 weeks of exercises. Higher values of peak torque of knee flexors were observed. This change was statistically significant at high load with angular velocity 90°/s (73.55 Nm at baseline and 89.05 Nm after 6 weeks) and 160°/s (69.40 Nm at baseline and 79.00 Nm after 6 weeks) in Group 2. In both groups higher values of maximum power were noted. Participants in Group 2 achieved lower values in each 35-metre run time and higher values of power. In Group 2 there was significant improvement of total time (35.26 s at baseline and 34.79 s after 6 weeks) compared to Group 1 (37.33 s at baseline and 37.56 s after 6 weeks). Exercises strengthening short foot muscles may improve energy transfer through body segments and increase strength and values of generated power. They should be included as a part of daily training programme of runners. This study was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR). Registration number: ACTRN12615001200572.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30719446 PMCID: PMC6334361 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6947273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Consort diagram.
Results of peak torque and maximum power of knee joint flexors in the isokinetic dynamometer measurement at baseline and after 6 weeks of exercising.
| Outcome Measure | Group 1 | P | Group 2 | P | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Peak Torque 90 (Nm) | Baseline | 76.00 +/- 30.61 | 73.55 +/- 21.23 | 0.990 | ||
| 6 Week | 81.11 +/- 28.67 | 0.732 | 89.05 +/- 25.03 |
| 0.754 | |
|
| ||||||
| Peak Torque 160 (Nm) | Baseline | 62.64 +/- 23.13 | 69.40 +/- 14.75 | 0.713 | ||
| 6 Week | 68.56 +/- 20.64 | 0.533 | 79.00 +/- 25.82 |
| 0.361 | |
|
| ||||||
| Peak Torque 240 (Nm) | Baseline | 55.57 +/- 17.00 | 56.95 +/- 16.72 | 0.991 | ||
| 6 Week | 59.85 +/- 16.08 | 0.414 | 59.63 +/- 13.58 | 0.836 | 0.999 | |
|
| ||||||
| Max. Power 90 (W) | Baseline | 95.85 +/- 42.09 | 98.70 +/- 29.82 | 0.994 | ||
| 6 Week | 107.81 +/- 41.73 | 0.347 | 118.05 +/- 35.90 |
| 0.803 | |
|
| ||||||
| Max. Power 160 (W) | Baseline | 123.82 +/- 51.14 | 124.75 +/- 31.91 | 0.999 | ||
| 6 Week | 143.22 +/- 50.93 | 0.188 | 145.66 +/- 51.05 | 0.245 | 0.998 | |
|
| ||||||
| Max. Power 240 (W) | Baseline | 146.59 +/- 53.50 | 142.05 +/- 45.38 | 0.993 | ||
| 6 Week | 157.00 +/- 58.27 | 0.672 | 170.35 +/- 70.91 |
| 0.860 | |
p: p-value.
∗ between baseline and 6 week.
∗∗ between study groups.
Results of maximum work per repetition, average work per repetition and total work of knee flexor muscles in the isokinetic dynamometer measurement at baseline and after 6 weeks of exercising.
| Outcome Measure | Group 1 | P | Group 2 | P | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Max Work x Rep 90 (J) | Baseline | 81.96 +/- 38.54 | 86.60 +/- 28.56 | 0.965 | ||
| 6 Week | 87.48 +/- 33.91 | 0.786 | 91.65 +/- 28.01 | 0.882 | 0.974 | |
|
| ||||||
| Max Work x Rep 160 (J) | Baseline | 70.74 +/- 31.26 | 76.65 +/- 24.95 | 0.874 | ||
| 6 Week | 73.30 +/- 22.13 | 0.969 | 80.32 +/- 26.26 | 0.943 | 0.805 | |
|
| ||||||
| Max Work x Rep 240 (J) | Baseline | 58.15 +/- 26.63 | 61.40 +/- 23.71 | 0.966 | ||
| 6 Week | 62.11 +/- 21.01 | 0.846 | 65.35 +/- 21.79 | 0.896 | 0.966 | |
|
| ||||||
| Avg Work x Rep 90 (J) | Baseline | 57.04 +/- 28.87 | 63.30 +/- 27.39 | 0.875 | ||
| 6 Week | 64.22 +/- 29.10 | 0.561 | 71.20 +/- 26.63 | 0.605 | 0.835 | |
|
| ||||||
| Avg Work x Rep 160 (J) | Baseline | 40.90 +/- 20.51 | 44.15 +/- 14.75 | 0.942 | ||
| 6 Week | 48.22 +/- 20.08 | 0.297 | 50.19 +/- 21.09 | 0.591 | 0.987 | |
|
| ||||||
| Avg Work x Rep 240 (J) | Baseline | 39.31 +/- 18.68 | 39.60 +/- 15.47 | 0.999 | ||
| 6 Week | 42.48 +/- 17.90 | 0.845 | 43.14 +/- 19.67 | 0.860 | 0.999 | |
|
| ||||||
| Total Work 90 (J) | Baseline | 572.19 +/- 290.36 | 632.30 +/- 273.42 | 0.888 | ||
| 6 Week | 644.70 +/- 291.84 | 0.553 | 712.45 +/- 266.92 | 0.593 | 0.848 | |
|
| ||||||
| Total Work 160 (J) | Baseline | 409.12 +/- 205.30 | 441.45 +/- 146.82 | 0.952 | ||
| 6 Week | 482.15 +/- 200.00 | 0.294 | 502.07 +/- 210.51 | 0.584 | 0.988 | |
|
| ||||||
| Total Work 240 (J) | Baseline | 393.34 +/- 184.87 | 396.25 +/- 155.10 | 0.999 | ||
| 6 Week | 425.44 +/- 179.27 | 0.839 | 431.63 +/- 197.29 | 0.859 | 0.999 | |
p: p-value.
∗ between baseline and 6 week.
∗∗ between study groups.
Results of flexors to extensors ratio in the isokinetic dynamometer measurement at baseline and after 6 weeks of exercising.
| Outcome Measure | Group 1 | P | Group 2 | P | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Flx/Ext Ratio 90 (%) | Baseline | 42.78 +/- 8.42 | 47.15 +/- 8.36 | 0.475 | ||
| 6 Week | 52.15 +/- 12.90 |
| 52.11 +/- 10.10 | 0.315 | 0.999 | |
|
| ||||||
| Flx/Ext Ratio 160 (%) | Baseline | 44.56 +/- 10.45 | 52.07 +/- 7.54 | 0.164 | ||
| 6 Week | 51.78 +/- 14.72 | 0.117 | 55.45 +/- 14.16 | 0.794 | 0.737 | |
|
| ||||||
| Flx/Ext Ratio 240 (%) | Baseline | 46.67 +/- 10.71 | 49.17 +/- 6.26 | 0.906 | ||
| 6 Week | 53.07 +/- 16.46 | 0.151 | 52.80 +/- 13.46 | 0.720 | 0.999 | |
P: p-value.
∗ between baseline and 6 week.
∗∗ between study groups.
Results of RAST at baseline and after 6 weeks of exercising.
| Outcome Measure | Group 1 | P | Group 1 | P | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Run 1–time (s) | Baseline | 5.92 +/- 0.70 | 5.56 +/- 0.41 | 0.191 | ||
| 6 Week | 5.94 +/- 0.75 | 0.997 | 5.48 +/- 0.33 | 0.373 | 0.064 | |
|
| ||||||
| Run 2–time (s) | Baseline | 5.98 +/- 0.78 | 5.62 +/- 0.43 | 0.233 | ||
| 6 Week | 5.97 +/- 0.77 | 0.999 | 5.58 +/- 0.37 | 0.630 | 0.174 | |
|
| ||||||
| Run 3–time (s) | Baseline | 6.23 +/- 0.80 | 5.87 +/- 0.53 | 0.281 | ||
| 6 Week | 6.28 +/- 0.80 | 0.914 | 5.80 +/- 0.37 | 0.545 | 0.084 | |
|
| ||||||
| Run 4–time (s) | Baseline | 6.32 +/- 0.81 | 5.99 +/- 0.48 | 0.351 | ||
| 6 Week | 6.37 +/- 0.83 | 0.912 | 5.93 +/- 0.40 | 0.589 | 0.145 | |
|
| ||||||
| Run 5–time (s) | Baseline | 6.46 +/- 0.85 | 6.12 +/- 0.49 | 0.357 | ||
| 6 Week | 6.57 +/- 0.86 | 0.573 | 6.01 +/- 0.38 | 0.256 |
| |
|
| ||||||
| Run 6–time (s) | Baseline | 6.41 +/- 0.86 | 6.11 +/- 0.47 | 0.471 | ||
| 6 Week | 6.42 +/- 0.87 | 0.999 | 5.98 +/- 0.39 | 0.154 | 0.162 | |
|
| ||||||
| Power of run 1 (W) | Baseline | 455.23 +/- 192.00 | 502.81 +/- 122.01 | 0.777 | ||
| 6 Week | 447.49 +/- 190.08 | 0.975 | 545.01 +/- 145.30 | 0.112 | 0.220 | |
|
| ||||||
| Power of run 2 (W) | Baseline | 429.08 +/- 173.61 | 512.29 +/- 151.40 | 0.335 | ||
| 6 Week | 440.45 +/- 185.94 | 0.948 | 518.49 +/- 139.23 | 0.822 | 0.392 | |
|
| ||||||
| Power of run 3 (W) | Baseline | 398.33 +/- 183.78 | 430.72 +/- 110.41 | 0.882 | ||
| 6 Week | 376.21 +/- 155.15 | 0.649 | 460.58 +/- 117.14 | 0.237 | 0.231 | |
|
| ||||||
| Power of run 4 (W) | Baseline | 360.59 +/- 139.31 | 428.01 +/- 140.55 | 0.356 | ||
| 6 Week | 362.98 +/- 155.09 | 0.999 | 430.00 +/- 103.83 | 0.935 | 0.361 | |
|
| ||||||
| Power of run 5 (W) | Baseline | 355.72 +/- 158.66 | 399.11 +/- 117.10 | 0.688 | ||
| 6 Week | 329.40 +/- 134.66 | 0.464 | 413.80 +/- 104.93 | 0.471 | 0.150 | |
|
| ||||||
| Power of run 6 (W) | Baseline | 348.74 +/- 137.38 | 400.43 +/- 117.68 | 0.546 | ||
| 6 Week | 355.75 +/- 151.10 | 0.963 | 421.15 +/- 104.22 | 0.314 | 0.341 | |
p: p-value.
∗between baseline and 6 week.
∗∗between study groups.
Figure 2Total time of RAST at baseline and after 6 weeks of exercising. ∗p: significantly different value.
Figure 3Maximal, minimal, and average power of RAST at baseline and after 6 weeks of exercising. ∗p: significantly different value.