Literature DB >> 10496574

The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries.

K R Kaufman1, S K Brodine, R A Shaffer, C W Johnson, T R Cullison.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study was to determine whether an association exists between foot structure and the development of musculoskeletal overuse injuries. The study group was a well-defined cohort of 449 trainees at the Naval Special Warfare Training Center in Coronado, California. Before beginning training, measurements were made of ankle motion, subtalar motion, and the static (standing) and dynamic (walking) characteristics of the foot arch. The subjects were tracked prospectively for injuries throughout training. We identified risk factors that predispose people to lower extremity overuse injuries. These risk factors include dynamic pes planus, pes cavus, restricted ankle dorsiflexion, and increased hindfoot inversion, all of which are subject to intervention and possible correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10496574     DOI: 10.1177/03635465990270050701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  101 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D F Murphy; D A J Connolly; B D Beynnon
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Neuromotor control of the lower limb in Achilles tendinopathy: implications for foot orthotic therapy.

Authors:  Narelle Wyndow; Sallie M Cowan; Tim V Wrigley; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Normative Functional Performance Values in High School Athletes: The Functional Pre-Participation Evaluation Project.

Authors:  James A Onate; Cambrie Starkel; Daniel R Clifton; Thomas M Best; James Borchers; Ajit Chaudhari; R Dawn Comstock; Nelson Cortes; Dustin R Grooms; Jay Hertel; Timothy E Hewett; Meghan Maume Miller; Xueliang Pan; Eric Schussler; Bonnie L Van Lunen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Differences in sole arch indices in various sports.

Authors:  S T Aydog; O Tetik; H A Demirel; M N Doral
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Initial effects of anti-pronation tape on the medial longitudinal arch during walking and running.

Authors:  B Vicenzino; M Franettovich; T McPoil; T Russell; G Skardoon
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Heel lifts and the stance phase of gait in subjects with limited ankle dorsiflexion.

Authors:  Marie A Johanson; Alanna Cooksey; Caroline Hillier; Heather Kobbeman; Amy Stambaugh
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Motion characteristics of the medial and lateral longitudinal arch during landing.

Authors:  Mako Fukano; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Lower extremity kinematics in running athletes with and without a history of medial shin pain.

Authors:  Janice K Loudon; Michael P Reiman
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-08

9.  A DELPHI STUDY OF RISK FACTORS FOR ACHILLES TENDINOPATHY- OPINIONS OF WORLD TENDON EXPERTS.

Authors:  Seth O'Neill; Paul J Watson; Simon Barry
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10

10.  Ankle dorsiflexion among healthy men with different qualities of lower extremity movement.

Authors:  Alon Rabin; Zvi Kozol; Elad Spitzer; Aharon Finestone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.