Literature DB >> 15125915

High-arched runners exhibit increased leg stiffness compared to low-arched runners.

Dorsey S Williams1, Irene McClay Davis, John P Scholz, Joseph Hamill, Thomas S Buchanan.   

Abstract

Leg stiffness between high-arched (HA) and low-arched (LA) runners was compared. It was hypothesized that high-arched runners would exhibit increased leg stiffness, increased sagittal plane support moment, greater vertical loading rates, decreased knee flexion excursion and increased activation of the knee extensor musculature. Twenty high-arched and 20 low-arched subjects were included in this study. Leg stiffness, knee stiffness, vertical loading rate and lower extremity support moment were compared between groups. Electromyographic data were collected in an attempt to explain differences in leg stiffness between groups. High-arched subjects were found to have increased leg stiffness and vertical loading rate compared to low-arched runners. Support moment at the impact peak of the vertical ground reaction force was related to leg stiffness across all subjects. High-arched subjects demonstrated decreased knee flexion excursion during stance. Finally, high-arched subjects exhibited a significantly earlier onset of the vastus lateralis (VL) than the low-arched runners. Differences exist in leg stiffness and vertical loading rate between runners with different foot types. Differences in lower extremity kinetics in individuals with different foot types may have implications for new treatment strategies or preventative measures. Copyright 2003 Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15125915     DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00087-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  33 in total

1.  Navicular bone position determined by positional MRI: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  Philip Hansen; Finn E Johannsen; Stine Hangaard; Sandra E Stallknecht; Bjarke B Hansen; Janus D Nybing; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Barefoot running: does it prevent injuries?

Authors:  Kelly Murphy; Emily J Curry; Elizabeth G Matzkin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Potential for Non-Contact ACL Injury Between Step-Close-Jump and Hop-Jump Tasks.

Authors:  Li-I Wang; Chin-Yi Gu; Wei-Ling Chen; Mu-San Chang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  The lower extremity biomechanics of single- and double-leg stop-jump tasks.

Authors:  Li-I Wang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Athletic footwear, leg stiffness, and running kinematics.

Authors:  Mark Bishop; Paul Fiolkowski; Bryan Conrad; Denis Brunt; MaryBeth Horodyski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  The navicular position test - a reliable measure of the navicular bone position during rest and loading.

Authors:  Søren Spörndly-Nees; Brian Dåsberg; Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen; Morten Ilum Boesen; Henning Langberg
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

Review 7.  Lower limb mechanical properties: determining factors and implications for performance.

Authors:  Stephen John Pearson; John McMahon
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Increased medial longitudinal arch mobility, lower extremity kinematics, and ground reaction forces in high-arched runners.

Authors:  D S Blaise Williams; Robin N Tierney; Robert J Butler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Stiffness as a Risk Factor for Achilles Tendon Injury in Running Athletes.

Authors:  Anna V Lorimer; Patria A Hume
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Dynamic Varus and the Development of Iliotibial Band Syndrome.

Authors:  Christopher D Stickley; Melanie M Presuto; Kara N Radzak; Christina M Bourbeau; Ronald K Hetzler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.