Literature DB >> 31655347

Recovery from tympanic membrane perforation: Effects on membrane thickness, auditory thresholds, and middle ear transmission.

Lingling Cai1, Glenna Stomackin2, Nicholas M Perez3, Xiaohui Lin2, Timothy T Jung4, Wei Dong5.   

Abstract

Sounds delivered to the ear move the tympanic membrane (TM), which drives the middle-ear (ME) ossicles and transfers the acoustic energy to the cochlea. Perforations of the TM result in hearing loss because of less efficient sound conduction through the ME. The patterns of TM motions, and thus ME sound transmission, vary with frequency and depend on many factors, including the TM thickness. In this study, we measured TM thickness, auditory brainstem responses (ABR), and ME transmission immediately following a controlled pars tensa perforation and after 4 weeks of spontaneous recovery in a gerbil model. It is found that after recovery, the hearing thresholds showed a sloping pattern across frequencies: almost back to normal levels at frequencies between 2 and 8 kHz, sloping loss in the low (<2 kHz) and mid-frequency (8-30 kHz) range, and little restoration at frequencies above 30 kHz. This pattern was confirmed by the measured ME pressure gains. The thickness of the healed TM did not return to normal but was 2-3 times thicker over a significant portion of the membrane. The increased thickness was not limited to the perforated area but expanded into intact regions adjacent to the perforation, which led to an increased thickness in general. Combined, these results suggest that TM thickness is an important factor in determining its vibration patterns and efficiency to transfer sounds to the ossicles and thus influencing ME sound transmission, especially for high-frequency sounds. The results provided both structural and functional observations to explain the conductive hearing loss seen in patients with abnormal TMs, e.g., caused by otitis media, spontaneously healed post-perforation, or repaired via tympanoplasty in the clinic. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healed tympanic-membrane post-perforation; Hearing; Middle-ear pressure gain; Middle-ear sound transmission; Optical coherence tomography; Tympanic-membrane thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31655347      PMCID: PMC6961563          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  51 in total

1.  Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Full-field thickness distribution of human tympanic membrane obtained with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sam Van der Jeught; Joris J J Dirckx; Johan R M Aerts; Adrian Bradu; Adrian G H Podoleanu; Jan A N Buytaert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-15

3.  Middle ear mechanics of Type III tympanoplasty (stapes columella): II. Clinical studies.

Authors:  Saumil N Merchant; Michael J McKenna; Ritvik P Mehta; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Tympanic membrane vibrations in cats studied by time-averaged holography.

Authors:  S M Khanna; J Tonndorf
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Tympanic membrane. Electron microscopic observation. I: pars tensa.

Authors:  D J Lim
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Real-time automated thickness measurement of the in vivo human tympanic membrane using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Zita Hubler; Nathan D Shemonski; Ryan L Shelton; Guillermo L Monroy; Ryan M Nolan; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-02

7.  Otopathologic evaluation of temporalis fascia grafts following successful tympanoplasty in humans.

Authors:  Danielle R Trakimas; Reuven Ishai; Iman Ghanad; Nicole L Black; Elliott D Kozin; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Aaron K Remenschneider
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Computer-assisted time-averaged holograms of the motion of the surface of the mammalian tympanic membrane with sound stimuli of 0.4-25 kHz.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Michael E Ravicz; Nesim Hulli; Maria Hernandez-Montes; Ellery Harrington; Cosme Furlong
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Motion of the surface of the human tympanic membrane measured with stroboscopic holography.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Antti A Aarnisalo; Ellery Harrington; Maria Del Socorro Hernandez-Montes; Cosme Furlong; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of the Human Tympanic Membrane and Its Influence on the Dynamic Behaviour of the Human Hearing System.

Authors:  L Caminos; J Garcia-Manrique; A Lima-Rodriguez; A Gonzalez-Herrera
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.781

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of acoustic changes in and the healing outcomes of rat eardrums with pars tensa and pars flaccida perforations.

Authors:  Yaoqian Liu; Cuiping Wu; Tingting Chen; Qiyue Shen; Yuanping Xiong; Zhengnong Chen; Chunyan Li
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  Forward and Reverse Middle Ear Transmission in Gerbil with a Normal or Spontaneously Healed Tympanic Membrane.

Authors:  Xiaohui Lin; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Glenna Stomackin; Timothy T Jung; Glen K Martin; Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-16

Review 3.  Experimental animal models of drug-induced sensorineural hearing loss: a narrative review.

Authors:  Xuexin Lin; Jia Luo; Jingqian Tan; Luoying Yang; Mitian Wang; Peng Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-09

4.  Assessment of auditory and vestibular damage in a mouse model after single and triple blast exposures.

Authors:  Beatrice Mao; Ying Wang; Tara Balasubramanian; Rodrigo Urioste; Talah Wafa; Tracy S Fitzgerald; Scott J Haraczy; Kamren Edwards-Hollingsworth; Zahra N Sayyid; Donna Wilder; Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja; Yanling Wei; Peethambaran Arun; Irene Gist; Alan G Cheng; Joseph B Long; Matthew W Kelley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.672

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.