Literature DB >> 30706944

Randomization tests as alternative analysis methods for behavior-analytic data.

Andrew R Craig1, Wayne W Fisher2.   

Abstract

Randomization statistics offer alternatives to many of the statistical methods commonly used in behavior analysis and the psychological sciences, more generally. These methods are more flexible than conventional parametric and nonparametric statistical techniques in that they make no assumptions about the underlying distribution of outcome variables, are relatively robust when applied to small-n data sets, and are generally applicable to between-groups, within-subjects, mixed, and single-case research designs. In the present article, we first will provide a historical overview of randomization methods. Next, we will discuss the properties of randomization statistics that may make them particularly well suited for analysis of behavior-analytic data. We will introduce readers to the major assumptions that undergird randomization methods, as well as some practical and computational considerations for their application. Finally, we will demonstrate how randomization statistics may be calculated for mixed and single-case research designs. Throughout, we will direct readers toward resources that they may find useful in developing randomization tests for their own data.
© 2019 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autocorrelation; between-groups research; data analysis; nonparametric statistics; randomization; single-case research; within-subjects research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30706944      PMCID: PMC6524641          DOI: 10.1002/jeab.500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  41 in total

1.  To permute or not to permute.

Authors:  Yifan Huang; Haiyan Xu; Violeta Calian; Jason C Hsu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Evidence-based practice in psychology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2006 May-Jun

3.  Using randomization tests with responsive single-case designs.

Authors:  J Ferron; W Ware
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1994-09

4.  Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: a primer and applications.

Authors:  William R Shadish; Larry V Hedges; James E Pustejovsky
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2013-12-27

5.  Interview-informed synthesized contingency analyses: Thirty replications and reanalysis.

Authors:  Joshua Jessel; Gregory P Hanley; Mahshid Ghaemmaghami
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-05-13

6.  Delivering alternative reinforcement in a distinct context reduces its counter-therapeutic effects on relapse.

Authors:  Andrew R Craig; Paul J Cunningham; Mary M Sweeney; Timothy A Shahan; John A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Resurgence as Choice.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Andrew R Craig
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Baseline reinforcement rate and resurgence of destructive behavior.

Authors:  Wayne W Fisher; Valdeep Saini; Brian D Greer; William E Sullivan; Henry S Roane; Ashley M Fuhrman; Andrew R Craig; Ryan T Kimball
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing.

Authors:  Jose D Perezgonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-03

10.  Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians.

Authors:  Asghar Ghasemi; Saleh Zahediasl
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-04-20
View more
  8 in total

1.  Monte Carlo Analyses for Single-Case Experimental Designs: An Untapped Resource for Applied Behavioral Researchers and Practitioners.

Authors:  Jonathan E Friedel; Alison Cox; Ann Galizio; Melissa Swisher; Megan L Small; Sofia Perez
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-11-24

2.  Quantitative Techniques and Graphical Representations for Interpreting Results from Alternating Treatment Design.

Authors:  Rumen Manolov; René Tanious; Patrick Onghena
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-05-13

3.  A Priori Justification for Effect Measures in Single-Case Experimental Designs.

Authors:  Rumen Manolov; Mariola Moeyaert; Joelle E Fingerhut
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-03-25

4.  Meta-Analytic Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Behavior Science Research.

Authors:  Art Dowdy; Donald A Hantula; Jason C Travers; Matt Tincani
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-07-21

5.  The Effects of Obligatory and Preferential Frames on Delay Discounting.

Authors:  Laura Barcelos Nomicos; Kenneth W Jacobs; Matthew L Locey
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2020-05-21

6.  Mitigating resurgence of destructive behavior using the discriminative stimuli of a multiple schedule.

Authors:  Wayne W Fisher; Ashley M Fuhrman; Brian D Greer; Daniel R Mitteer; Cathleen C Piazza
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Sustaining behavior reduction by transitioning the topography of the functional communication response.

Authors:  Kayla R Randall; Brian D Greer; Sean W Smith; Ryan T Kimball
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2021-03-13

8.  Randomized Single-Case Intervention Designs and Analyses for Health Sciences Researchers: A Versatile Clinical Trials Companion.

Authors:  Joel R Levin; Thomas R Kratochwill
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 1.778

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.