Literature DB >> 35342865

Meta-Analytic Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Behavior Science Research.

Art Dowdy1,2, Donald A Hantula3, Jason C Travers1, Matt Tincani1.   

Abstract

Publication bias is an issue of great concern across a range of scientific fields. Although less documented in the behavior science fields, there is a need to explore viable methods for evaluating publication bias, in particular for studies based on single-case experimental design logic. Although publication bias is often detected by examining differences between meta-analytic effect sizes for published and grey studies, difficulties identifying the extent of grey studies within a particular research corpus present several challenges. We describe in this article several meta-analytic techniques for examining publication bias when published and grey literature are available as well as alternative meta-analytic techniques when grey literature is inaccessible. Although the majority of these methods have primarily been applied to meta-analyses of group design studies, our aim is to provide preliminary guidance for behavior scientists who might use or adapt these techniques for evaluating publication bias. We provide sample data sets and R scripts to follow along with the statistical analysis in hope that an increased understanding of publication bias and respective techniques will help researchers understand the extent to which it is a problem in behavior science research. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior science; evidence-based behavior analysis; meta-analysis; publication bias; research-synthesis; single-case experimental design

Year:  2021        PMID: 35342865      PMCID: PMC8894526          DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00303-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci        ISSN: 2520-8969


  32 in total

1.  A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Macaskill; S D Walter; L Irwig
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael S Rosenberg
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.

Authors:  Roger M Harbord; Matthias Egger; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jaime L Peters; Alex J Sutton; David R Jones; Keith R Abrams; Lesley Rushton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research via Multilevel Models: Fundamental Concepts and Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Mariola Moeyaert; Rumen Manolov; Emily Rodabaugh
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2018-10-26

6.  Social Studies Content Knowledge Interventions for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Justin D Garwood; John W McKenna; Garrett J Roberts; Stephen Ciullo; Mikyung Shin
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2019-03-10

7.  Evaluation of publication bias in response interruption and redirection: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Art Dowdy; Matt Tincani; W Joel Schneider
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2020-05-14

8.  Improving Psychological Science through Transparency and Openness: An Overview.

Authors:  Andrew H Hales; Eric D Wesselmann; Joseph Hilgard
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2018-11-14

9.  The "Reproducibility Crisis:" Might the Methods Used Frequently in Behavior-Analysis Research Help?

Authors:  Marc N Branch
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2018-06-04

10.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Mazumdar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.