Literature DB >> 30706131

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in functional anorectal disorders: results from a large observational cohort study.

Charlotte Andrianjafy1, Laure Luciano2, Camille Bazin1, Karine Baumstarck3, Michel Bouvier1, Véronique Vitton4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to describe the results of 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM) in a large cohort of patients with functional anorectal disorders.
METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, all consecutive patients referred for investigation of fecal incontinence (FI) or dyssynergic defecation (DD) underwent 3DHRAM. The parameters analyzed were usual manometric data, repartition of dyssynergic patterns, and the prevalence of a new "muscular subtype classification" underlying dyssynergia, anal sphincter defects, and pelvic floor disorders.
RESULTS: Final analyses were performed in 1477 patients with a mean age 54 ± 16 years; 825 patients suffered from DD, and 652 patients suffered from FI. Among these patients, 86% met the diagnostic criteria for dyssynergia. Type II dyssynergia was the most frequently observed (56%) in women and men suffering from FI and in women with DD. Type I was the most frequently observed in men with DD (49%). Regarding the muscle type subgroups, combined puborectalis muscle involvement with an external anal sphincter profile was the most frequently observed. The global prevalence of rectal intussusception and excessive perineal descent were 12% and 21%, respectively. Type III dyssynergia was more frequently associated with pelvic floor disorders than were other types of dyssynergia (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This large cohort study provides reference values for 3DHRAM in patients with functional anorectal disorders. Further studies are necessary to assess the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in healthy volunteers and to develop new scores and classifications including all of these new parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D high-resolution anorectal manometry; Constipation; Fecal incontinence; Functional anorectal disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30706131     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03235-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  42 in total

Review 1.  AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques.

Authors:  N E Diamant; M A Kamm; A Wald; W E Whitehead
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience.

Authors:  Fernando Azpiroz; Paul Enck; William E Whitehead
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Level of classification performance of KESS (symptom scoring system for constipation) validated in a prospective series of 105 patients.

Authors:  Charles H Knowles; S Mark Scott; Paula E Legg; Marion E Allison; Peter J Lunniss
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Risk factors for female anal incontinence: new insight through the Evanston-Northwestern twin sisters study.

Authors:  Yoram Abramov; Peter K Sand; Sylvia M Botros; Sanjay Gandhi; Jay-James R Miller; Angel Nickolov; Roger P Goldberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Normal values and pressure morphology for three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry of asymptomatic adults: a study in 110 subjects.

Authors:  Yuwei Li; Xiaoqing Yang; Chen Xu; Yi Zhang; Xipeng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Anorectal manometry: the state of the art.

Authors:  P D Meunier; D Gallavardin
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  1993 Jul-Oct       Impact factor: 2.404

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance defecography versus clinical examination and fluoroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Ramage; C Simillis; C Yen; C Lutterodt; S Qiu; E Tan; C Kontovounisios; P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and classification of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) workshop.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Gena Dunivan; Patricia S Goode; Emily S Lukacz; Alayne D Markland; Catherine A Matthews; Louise Mott; Rebecca G Rogers; Alan R Zinsmeister; William E Whitehead; Satish S C Rao; Frank A Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome compared with healthy adults: a retrospective study in 79 cases.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Rong Zhao; Jeffrey L Conklin; Xiaoqing Yang; Yi Zhang; Xipeng Zhang; Hai Qin; Yuwei Li
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.566

10.  The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements.

Authors:  H Heinrich; H Fruehauf; M Sauter; A Steingötter; M Fried; W Schwizer; M Fox
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.598

View more
  2 in total

1.  Anorectal dysfunction in patients with mid-low rectal cancer after surgery: A pilot study with three-dimensional high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Yan-Na Pi; Yi Xiao; Zhi-Feng Wang; Guo-Le Lin; Hui-Zhong Qiu; Xiu-Cai Fang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 1.534

2.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.