Chen Xu1, Rong Zhao, Jeffrey L Conklin, Xiaoqing Yang, Yi Zhang, Xipeng Zhang, Hai Qin, Yuwei Li. 1. aDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Nankai University Affiliated Hospital bDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China cDivision of Digestive Diseases, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the three-dimensional anorectal pressure topography of normal healthy adults and patients with paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS) using a novel three-dimensional high-resolution manometry (3D-HRM) of the anorectum. METHODS: The 3D-HRM probe has a 6.4 cm long sensing segment that is composed of 256 independent pressure transducers around its circumference. It generates a 3D pressure topographic profile of the anorectum. We evaluated 41 women and 38 men with PPS (median age 52 years), and compared them with 37 women and 34 men who were healthy (median age 51 years). The three-dimensional anorectal pressure topography was evaluated at rest, and during squeeze, stimulated defecation, and balloon inflation. RESULTS: Maximum resting pressure, mean resting pressure, high pressure zone length, and residual anal pressure were significantly higher in patients with PPS compared with healthy adults (P<0.01 each). The rectoanal pressure differential was significantly lower in the PPS patients compared with healthy adults (P<0.05). There was a characteristic purple high-pressure area in the posterior wall of the pressure cylinder of patients with PPS during stimulated defecation that was absent in healthy adults. The longest diameter and widest diameter of this purple high-pressure area were 1.71 ± 0.25 and 1.07 ± 0.14 cm. The maximum, mean, and minimum pressures of the posterior distal pressure zone were significantly higher in patients with PPS (270.1 ± 8.2, 152.7 ± 4.8, and 51.9 ± 2.7 mmHg, respectively) compared with healthy adults (168.5 ± 11.1, 88.0 ± 5.9, and 30.7 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively) (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Using the 3D-HRM technique, the increase in the resting pressure and residual anal pressure and decrease in the rectoanal pressure differential in patients with PPS compared with healthy adults further indicated the mechanism of this disease. Unlike traditional manometry, the 3D-HRM technique could find, locate, and evaluate the scope and the pressure of the paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle, which further indicates the value of manometry in terms of diagnosis.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the three-dimensional anorectal pressure topography of normal healthy adults and patients with paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS) using a novel three-dimensional high-resolution manometry (3D-HRM) of the anorectum. METHODS: The 3D-HRM probe has a 6.4 cm long sensing segment that is composed of 256 independent pressure transducers around its circumference. It generates a 3D pressure topographic profile of the anorectum. We evaluated 41 women and 38 men with PPS (median age 52 years), and compared them with 37 women and 34 men who were healthy (median age 51 years). The three-dimensional anorectal pressure topography was evaluated at rest, and during squeeze, stimulated defecation, and balloon inflation. RESULTS: Maximum resting pressure, mean resting pressure, high pressure zone length, and residual anal pressure were significantly higher in patients with PPS compared with healthy adults (P<0.01 each). The rectoanal pressure differential was significantly lower in the PPSpatients compared with healthy adults (P<0.05). There was a characteristic purple high-pressure area in the posterior wall of the pressure cylinder of patients with PPS during stimulated defecation that was absent in healthy adults. The longest diameter and widest diameter of this purple high-pressure area were 1.71 ± 0.25 and 1.07 ± 0.14 cm. The maximum, mean, and minimum pressures of the posterior distal pressure zone were significantly higher in patients with PPS (270.1 ± 8.2, 152.7 ± 4.8, and 51.9 ± 2.7 mmHg, respectively) compared with healthy adults (168.5 ± 11.1, 88.0 ± 5.9, and 30.7 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively) (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Using the 3D-HRM technique, the increase in the resting pressure and residual anal pressure and decrease in the rectoanal pressure differential in patients with PPS compared with healthy adults further indicated the mechanism of this disease. Unlike traditional manometry, the 3D-HRM technique could find, locate, and evaluate the scope and the pressure of the paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle, which further indicates the value of manometry in terms of diagnosis.
Authors: Shreya Raja; Francis C Okeke; Ellen M Stein; Sameer Dhalla; Monica Nandwani; Kristle L Lynch; C Prakash Gyawali; John O Clarke Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Adil E Bharucha; Guido Basilisco; Allison Malcolm; Tae Hee Lee; Matthew B Hoy; S Mark Scott; Satish S C Rao Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2022-02-27 Impact factor: 3.960
Authors: Vikram Rangan; Mohammed Zakari; William Hirsch; Sarah Ballou; Prashant Singh; Thomas Sommers; Johanna Iturrino; Judy Nee; Kyle Staller; Anthony Lembo Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Maarten S Vlietstra; Paul F Vollebregt; Ingrid J M Han-Geurts; Vera Rempe-Sorm; Grietje J H Vander Mijnsbrugge; Charlotte B H Molenaar Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 3.067